Constitutional Law

President and Governor: Position and Powers

Understand aid and advice, limited discretion, ordinance and assent powers, and the latest Supreme Court position on Governors and State Bills.

By Advocate Aditya Sharma9 min read

Quick answer

The President and Governor are constitutional heads who ordinarily act on ministerial aid and advice, with limited text-based areas of discretion.

The constitutional head and the elected executive

Executive power is formally vested in the President or Governor, but responsible government places ordinary political decision-making with the Council of Ministers.

Aid and advice

The President ordinarily acts on the aid and advice of the Union Council of Ministers. The Governor follows the same parliamentary principle at State level except where the Constitution validly permits discretion.

Appointment powers

The President appoints the Prime Minister and other ministers on advice; the Governor appoints the Chief Minister and other ministers. Where a clear majority exists, constitutional choice is narrow.

Legislative functions

These include summoning, proroguing, addressing the legislature and dealing with Bills. Formal power must be exercised within responsible government and the specific constitutional provision.

Ordinances

Articles 123 and 213 permit temporary legislation when the relevant legislature is not in session and immediate action is considered necessary. Ordinance power cannot become a routine substitute for legislation.

Discretion, government formation and assent

Discretion is an exception that must be traced to constitutional text, structure or a situation where ordinary advice cannot logically control.

Government formation

In a hung House, the head may need to identify who is most likely to command confidence. The decisive constitutional test is ordinarily a floor test, not a private assessment of political support.

Article 200 options

The 2025 Presidential Reference states that a Governor may assent, reserve the Bill for the President, or withhold assent and return a non-Money Bill with comments. The last route is not a separate pocket veto.

Current review position

The merits of the Governor’s chosen Article 200 option are not ordinarily justiciable. In glaring prolonged, unexplained and indefinite inaction, a court may issue a limited direction requiring discharge of the constitutional function.

No automatic deemed assent

The 2025 opinion rejects judicial substitution of the constitutional decision through fixed universal timelines or deemed assent. Accountability operates through the limited constitutional remedy for inaction.

Landmark cases

Learn the facts, the rule and why the case matters. The citation alone will not strengthen an answer.

Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab

(1974) 2 SCC 831

Facts: Probationary judicial officers challenged termination orders issued in the name of the Governor, raising the nature of personal and ministerial satisfaction.

Legal question: Do the President and Governor ordinarily exercise executive powers personally?

Held: The President and Governor are constitutional heads who generally exercise formal powers on ministerial aid and advice, subject to narrow constitutional exceptions.

Reasoning: The Constitution establishes cabinet government. Formal executive power is generally exercised on ministerial aid and advice, except in narrowly recognised discretionary situations.

Use in an answer: Use it as the starting rule for executive power under the parliamentary system.

Read the judgment

Nabam Rebia v. Deputy Speaker

(2016) 8 SCC 1

Facts: The Governor of Arunachal Pradesh advanced an Assembly session and fixed its agenda during an intense dispute over the government and Speaker.

Legal question: Did the Governor possess a broad personal discretion to direct legislative business?

Held: The Governor does not possess a general discretionary authority and must remain within the constitutional field assigned to the office.

Reasoning: The office carries no general reserve of discretionary power. Any departure from aid and advice must be grounded in the Constitution and remain within the assigned function.

Use in an answer: Use it to reject an undefined reserve of personal gubernatorial power.

In Re: Assent, Withholding or Reservation of Bills by the Governor and the President

2025 INSC 1333

Facts: The President referred questions concerning the constitutional options, discretion, timelines and judicial review applicable when Governors and the President consider State Bills.

Legal question: What are the available Article 200 choices and what remedy exists against prolonged gubernatorial inaction?

Held: The Court clarified the three Article 200 options, discretion in choosing among them and the limited remedy available against prolonged, unexplained and indefinite inaction.

Reasoning: The opinion identified three options and rejected merits review, fixed universal timelines and deemed assent. It preserved a limited mandamus where inaction is prolonged, unexplained and indefinite.

Use in an answer: Use it as the current authority on assent, justiciability, timelines and limited mandamus.

Read the judgment

How to write this answer in an exam

  1. Begin with the parliamentary executive and aid-and-advice rule.
  2. Identify the exact formal power being exercised.
  3. Ask whether the Constitution permits discretion in that setting.
  4. For Bills, apply the current three-option Article 200 framework.
  5. Separate review of prolonged inaction from merits review.

Quick revision

  • Both offices are constitutional heads.
  • Aid and advice is the ordinary rule.
  • Discretion is limited, not general.
  • A floor test ordinarily proves legislative confidence.
  • Article 200 inaction can receive limited judicial correction.

Test yourself

  1. When can a Governor act without ministerial advice?
  2. What are the three Article 200 options?
  3. Can a court grant deemed assent under the current position?

Frequently asked questions

Can the Governor permanently keep a State Bill pending?

The Constitution does not create a pocket veto. Under the 2025 opinion, prolonged, unexplained and indefinite inaction can attract a limited judicial direction to discharge the function.

Does the President personally run the Union executive?

No. In the parliamentary system, the President ordinarily acts on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, which is politically responsible to Lok Sabha.

Sources and further reading