Criminal Procedure

Maintenance of Wives, Children and Parents under BNSS

Learn BNSS Sections 144 to 147 on maintenance eligibility, neglect, interim relief, quantum, enforcement, alteration and leading Supreme Court cases.

Written and reviewed by Advocate Aditya Sharma14 min read
BNSS Sections 144 to 147Constitution Articles 15(3), 21 and 39

The short answer

BNSS Section 144 provides a quick social-justice remedy where a person with sufficient means neglects or refuses to maintain an eligible wife, child or parent who cannot maintain themselves. The Magistrate may grant interim and final monthly support, date it from the application, alter it when circumstances change and enforce unpaid amounts.

Who can claim maintenance under BNSS Section 144?

The remedy protects specified family members against destitution, but each claimant must fit the statutory category and prove the relevant inability and neglect.

A first-class Magistrate may order monthly maintenance after proof that a person having sufficient means neglected or refused to maintain an eligible dependant. Means includes actual income and may include earning capacity, assets, lifestyle and resources deliberately kept out of view. The provision prevents want; it is not a punishment for marital misconduct.

The phrase unable to maintain does not require a claimant to be completely penniless. Courts examine whether the person can reasonably support a dignified basic life in the circumstances, while avoiding an automatic equation between every income difference and statutory inability.

Wife, including a divorced wife

A wife unable to maintain herself may claim. The chapter expressly includes a woman divorced by, or who obtained divorce from, her husband and has not remarried.

Minor children

A legitimate or illegitimate child, married or unmarried, may claim while unable to maintain itself. For a married minor daughter, the father may be directed to pay until majority if her husband lacks sufficient means.

Adult child with disability or injury

A legitimate or illegitimate adult child, other than a married daughter, remains covered where physical or mental abnormality or injury prevents self-maintenance.

Father or mother

A parent unable to maintain himself or herself may proceed against a child with sufficient means. The obligation is statutory and is not confined to a claimant mother.

How does the Magistrate decide maintenance and procedure?

The amount should meet reasonable needs without becoming oppressive, using frank financial disclosure and the real circumstances of both sides.

Relevant financial factors

Courts consider needs, standard of living, dependants, housing, education, healthcare, actual and potential income, liabilities and any independent resources. A capable person cannot escape a basic duty through voluntary unemployment or concealment.

Interim maintenance and costs

The Magistrate may award interim monthly support and proceeding expenses while the main claim is pending. The interim application should, as far as possible, be decided within sixty days after service of notice.

Date of payment

Maintenance, interim maintenance and proceeding expenses are payable from the order date or, if the Magistrate directs, from the application date. Reasons and the justice of the delay should inform the choice.

Venue and evidence

Section 145 permits proceedings where the respondent is, where the respondent or wife resides, or where they last lived together, and where applicable where the mother of the illegitimate child resides. Evidence is ordinarily taken in the respondent's presence, subject to lawful ex parte proceedings for wilful avoidance.

Financial disclosure and overlap

Rajnesh v. Neha requires structured asset and liability disclosure and disclosure of earlier maintenance proceedings. Parallel remedies may coexist, but courts should adjust amounts and avoid double recovery.

When may maintenance be refused, enforced or changed?

The chapter balances immediate support with statutory defences, recovery deadlines and power to respond to later changes.

If a husband offers to maintain his wife only if she lives with him, the Magistrate examines her reason for refusing. A second marriage or keeping a mistress is expressly a just ground for living separately. Maintenance is barred or cancelled if the wife is living in adultery, refuses cohabitation without sufficient reason or the parties live separately by mutual consent.

Recovery and imprisonment

For each breach without sufficient cause, a Magistrate may issue a warrant to levy arrears like a fine and may impose up to one month's imprisonment for the unpaid portion, or until earlier payment. Recovery must be sought within one year of the amount becoming due.

Alteration under Section 146

A proved change in the circumstances of payer or recipient permits alteration. A competent civil-court decision may also require cancellation or variation.

Divorce-related changes

Remarriage ends a divorced wife's order from the remarriage date. Payments due under customary or personal law and a voluntary post-divorce surrender are handled through the detailed cancellation and adjustment rules in Section 146.

Nationwide enforcement

Section 147 requires a free copy for the beneficiary and permits enforcement by a Magistrate wherever the liable person is found, once identity and non-payment are established.

Divorced Muslim women

Mohd. Abdul Samad confirms that the secular Section 125 CrPC remedy remained available to divorced Muslim women alongside the 1986 Act, with adjustment against double benefit. The materially continued BNSS definition and social-justice object should be read with that authority.

Leading cases and what they establish

Read each authority for the proposition it proves, the legal question it answers and the reasoning that supports the result.

Chaturbhuj v. Sita Bai

(2008) 2 SCC 316

Held: Maintenance prevents vagrancy and destitution through a speedy social-justice remedy. A wife need not be absolutely destitute before claiming, and the court examines whether her resources are sufficient for reasonable self-maintenance.

Why it matters: Use it to explain unable to maintain and the beneficial object of Section 144.

Rajnesh v. Neha

(2021) 2 SCC 324

Held: Courts should use comprehensive financial disclosure, account for overlapping maintenance proceedings, normally address commencement from the application date with reasons and enforce orders effectively.

Why it matters: Use it for quantum, concealed income, multiple proceedings, arrears and procedural standardisation.

Read the judgment

Mohd. Abdul Samad v. State of Telangana

2024 INSC 506

Held: The secular summary maintenance remedy under Section 125 CrPC applies to married and divorced Muslim women and coexists with the 1986 Act, while prior payments may be adjusted to prevent double benefit.

Why it matters: Use it when personal-law remedies are argued to exclude the general maintenance jurisdiction continued in BNSS Section 144.

Read the judgment

Using this topic in a legal answer

A clear answer sequence

  1. Identify the claimant category and inability to maintain under Section 144.
  2. Prove the respondent's sufficient means and neglect or refusal.
  3. Assess income, earning capacity, needs, dependants and financial disclosure for quantum.
  4. Deal with separate residence, statutory bars, interim relief, start date and overlapping proceedings.
  5. Conclude with enforcement under Section 144(3), alteration under Section 146 and cross-jurisdiction enforcement under Section 147.

Points that are often confused

  • Saying a claimant must have no income at all.
  • Treating the wife's maintenance claim as identical to the child's independent claim.
  • Ignoring interim maintenance, proceeding expenses and the possible application-date award.
  • Adding amounts from parallel proceedings without adjustment for overlap.
Open the revision and self-check sheet

Rules to retain

  • Section 144 protects an eligible wife, children and parents against neglect by a person with sufficient means.
  • Wife includes a divorced woman who has not remarried.
  • Interim support and proceeding expenses should, as far as possible, be decided within sixty days after service.
  • Recovery of each due amount must be sought within one year from when it became due.
  • Sections 146 and 147 address later changes and enforcement wherever the liable person is found.

Questions to test understanding

  1. Which adult children remain eligible under Section 144?
  2. When is refusal to live with a husband legally justified?
  3. How should a court handle two maintenance orders covering the same period?

Questions students ask

Can a wife claim maintenance if she has some income?

Yes. Some income is not an automatic bar. The court asks whether it is sufficient for reasonable self-maintenance in the circumstances, while comparing actual needs, resources and the respondent's means without guaranteeing an identical lifestyle in every case.

Can maintenance be awarded from the application date?

Yes. Section 144(2) permits payment from the order date or, if directed, the application date. Rajnesh v. Neha supports a reasoned approach that prevents court delay from unfairly defeating support.

Is imprisonment a substitute for paying maintenance arrears?

No. Imprisonment under the enforcement provision responds to a breach without sufficient cause; it does not automatically wipe out the underlying maintenance liability. Recovery procedure and the one-year application limit must still be applied to each default.

Primary sources and further reading

This article is written for legal education. Verify the governing provision, applicable amendments and complete judgment before relying on a proposition in practice.