Labour Law MCQs for CLAT PG, Page 3

CLAT PG Labour Law questions 41-60 of 60, with answer keys and explanations covering industrial disputes, trade unions, standing orders, wages, social security, occupational safety, and labour codes.

60 questions60 topics41-60 on this page

Topics in this subject

Revise core LLB subjects through CLAT PG MCQs, passage-led questions, answer keys, explanations, statutes, and exam-oriented legal principles.

  • 2017 Amendment - Duration of Maternity Benefit1
  • 2017 Amendment - Key Changes Identified in the Passage1
  • A. Sundarambal - Teachers Excluded1
  • Aggregator Contribution Mechanism Under the Code on Social Security1
  • Bangalore Water Supply - Core Test1
  • Broader Trajectory Connecting Both Developments1
  • Chandramalai Estate - Independence of the Two Inquiries1
  • Code on Wages - Floor Wage Innovation1
  • Code on Wages 2019 - Absorption of the Bonus Act1
  • Commissioning and Adopting Mothers1
  • Common Analytical Thread Across Sector-Specific Statutes1
  • Current Status of Bangalore Water Supply Precedent1
  • Dharangadhra Chemical Works - Control Test1
  • Distinct Legal Questions Addressed by the Two Developments1
  • Distinction Based on Number of Surviving Children1
  • Dual Threshold for Factory Definition1
  • Dual-Ceiling Structure - Eligibility vs Calculation1
  • Establishment-Based Model and Its Historical Gap1
  • Exceptions Carved Out in Bangalore Water Supply1
  • Food Corporation of India Staff Union - Confirmation of the Gap1
  • Gig Economy - Failure of Traditional Employment Tests1
  • Heightened Age Threshold for Underground Mining1
  • Industrial Relations Code - Negotiating Union Innovation1
  • Industrial Relations Code 2020 - Structured Recognition Framework1
  • Limited Scope of the 1961 Act at the Time of Nargesh Meerza1
  • Maternity Benefit Act - Qualifying Period for Eligibility1
  • Maximum Bonus and Allocable Surplus1
  • Mines Act - Definition of Mine1
  • Minimum Bonus - Payable Regardless of Profit or Loss1
  • Nargesh Meerza - Constitutional Basis for Striking Down the Provision1
  • Overall Structure of Retrenchment Protections1
  • Overall Structure of the Four Codes1
  • Overall Trajectory of India's Social Security Coverage Expansion1
  • Overtime Wages - Dual Function1
  • Patchwork of Pre-2020 Recognition Mechanisms1
  • Plantation Labour Act - Rationale for Housing and Medical Obligations1
  • Practical Consequence of the Wide Test1
  • Practical Significance of the Legality-Justifiability Distinction1
  • Predominant Nature of Duties Test - Adyanthaya1
  • Punjab Land Development - Consequence of Non-Compliance1
  • Purpose of Notice Before Opening a Mine1
  • Qualifying Period for Bonus Eligibility1
  • Reason for Codification - Fragmentation Problem1
  • Relationship Between the Three Cases1
  • Section 11A - Creche Facility Requirement1
  • Section 22 and Section 24 - Mechanism of Illegality1
  • Section 25B - The 240 Days Deeming Provision1
  • Section 25F - Mandatory Conditions for Retrenchment1
  • Section 25G - Last Come First Go Principle1
  • Section 67 - Absolute Prohibition for Children1
  • Section 87 - Targeted vs Uniform Regulation1
  • Significance of the 2020 Code as a Departure from Prior Practice1
  • Significance of the Workman Definition1
  • State of UP v Jai Bir Singh - Reservations Expressed1
  • Syndicate Bank - Wage Entitlement Framework1
  • Threshold Change for Government Permission1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Scope and Limitation1
  • Two Distinct Inquiries - Legality and Justifiability1
  • Unorganised Workers Act - Scheme-Based Approach1
  • Working Hours Limits and Spread Over1
Passage or principleMaternity Benefit Act - Qualifying Period for Eligibility

The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 represents a foundational piece of Indian social welfare legislation designed to regulate the employment of women in certain establishments for specified periods before and after childbirth, and to provide for maternity benefit and other connected entitlements. Under Section 5, a woman is entitled to maternity benefit only if she has actually worked in the establishment of the relevant employer for not less than eighty days in the twelve months immediately preceding the date of her expected delivery, a qualifying period intended to ensure the benefit is reserved for women with a genuine and substantial employment connection to the establishment. The Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017 substantially enhanced the statutory protections available under the original 1961 framework. Most significantly, the amendment increased the maximum duration of paid maternity benefit from twelve weeks to twenty-six weeks for women having fewer than two surviving children, with the proviso that the period of leave availed before the expected date of delivery shall not exceed eight weeks, leaving the remainder to be availed after delivery. For women who already have two or more surviving children, the amendment retained the shorter duration of twelve weeks, with a maximum of six weeks permissible before the expected delivery date, reflecting an embedded population and family planning policy consideration within the statutory leave structure. The 2017 amendment also addressed evolving methods of family formation by extending maternity benefit to a 'commissioning mother', defined as a biological mother who uses her own egg to create an embryo implanted in another woman in a surrogacy arrangement, and to an 'adopting mother' who legally adopts a child below the age of three months. Both categories are entitled to maternity benefit for a period of twelve weeks calculated from the date the child is handed over to the relevant mother, extending the protective ambit of the Act beyond its original conception centred exclusively on a woman who herself undergoes pregnancy and childbirth. A further significant innovation was the insertion of Section 11A, requiring every establishment having a prescribed number of employees to provide a creche facility within a prescribed distance, either independently or in conjunction with shared common facilities, and obligating the employer to permit the woman four visits a day to the creche, inclusive of the interval for rest otherwise allowed to her. Section 12 of the Act, meanwhile, continues to provide protection against discharge or dismissal of a woman during or on account of her absence in accordance with the Act, further clarifying that any such discharge or dismissal shall not deprive her of the maternity benefit or medical bonus to which she would otherwise have been entitled.

Question 41EasyMaternity Benefit Act - Qualifying Period for Eligibility

According to the passage, what is the qualifying period a woman must satisfy under Section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 to be entitled to maternity benefit?

  1. A

    She must have actually worked in the establishment for not less than eighty days in the twelve months immediately preceding the date of her expected delivery

  2. B

    She must have worked in the establishment for at least five complete years prior to the date of delivery

  3. C

    There is no qualifying period whatsoever and every woman is automatically entitled regardless of employment duration

  4. D

    She must have worked exclusively in a managerial capacity for the relevant establishment

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. She must have actually worked in the establishment for not less than eighty days in the twelve months immediately preceding the date of her expected delivery

The passage states directly: 'a woman is entitled to maternity benefit only if she has actually worked in the establishment of the relevant employer for not less than eighty days in the twelve months immediately preceding the date of her expected delivery.' This eighty-day threshold within the relevant twelve-month window is the specific qualifying period described.

Source note: Maternity Benefit Act - Qualifying Period for Eligibility

Question 42Medium2017 Amendment - Duration of Maternity Benefit

From the passage, what change did the Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017 make to the duration of maternity benefit for women with fewer than two surviving children?

  1. A

    The amendment reduced the duration from twenty-six weeks to twelve weeks

  2. B

    The amendment increased the maximum duration of paid maternity benefit from twelve weeks to twenty-six weeks, with the period of leave availed before the expected delivery date not exceeding eight weeks, with the remainder to be availed after delivery

  3. C

    The amendment eliminated maternity benefit entirely for this category of women

  4. D

    The amendment made no change whatsoever to the duration for any category of women

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The amendment increased the maximum duration of paid maternity benefit from twelve weeks to twenty-six weeks, with the period of leave availed before the expected delivery date not exceeding eight weeks, with the remainder to be availed after delivery

The passage states the amendment 'increased the maximum duration of paid maternity benefit from twelve weeks to twenty-six weeks for women having fewer than two surviving children, with the proviso that the period of leave availed before the expected date of delivery shall not exceed eight weeks, leaving the remainder to be availed after delivery.' This precise structure (26 weeks total, max 8 weeks pre-delivery) is the key change for this category.

Source note: 2017 Amendment - Duration of Maternity Benefit

Question 43MediumDistinction Based on Number of Surviving Children

According to the passage, how does the duration of maternity benefit differ for a woman who already has two or more surviving children, compared to a woman with fewer than two surviving children?

  1. A

    There is no distinction whatsoever and all women receive an identical duration of benefit regardless of the number of surviving children

  2. B

    For women with two or more surviving children, the amendment retained the shorter duration of twelve weeks, with a maximum of six weeks permissible before the expected delivery date, reflecting an embedded population and family planning policy consideration

  3. C

    Women with two or more surviving children receive a longer duration of benefit (thirty weeks) compared to women with fewer children

  4. D

    The distinction applies only to commissioning mothers and has no relevance to women who give birth themselves

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. For women with two or more surviving children, the amendment retained the shorter duration of twelve weeks, with a maximum of six weeks permissible before the expected delivery date, reflecting an embedded population and family planning policy consideration

The passage explicitly draws this distinction: 'For women who already have two or more surviving children, the amendment retained the shorter duration of twelve weeks, with a maximum of six weeks permissible before the expected delivery date, reflecting an embedded population and family planning policy consideration within the statutory leave structure.' This is presented as a deliberate policy choice connecting maternity benefit duration to family planning considerations.

Source note: Distinction Based on Number of Surviving Children

Question 44HardCommissioning and Adopting Mothers

From the passage, what specific categories of mothers were brought within the scope of maternity benefit through the 2017 amendment, and for what duration?

  1. A

    Only biological mothers who themselves give birth were covered, with no extension to any other category

  2. B

    A 'commissioning mother' (a biological mother whose egg creates an embryo implanted in another woman in a surrogacy arrangement) and an 'adopting mother' who legally adopts a child below three months of age, both entitled to maternity benefit for twelve weeks from the date the child is handed over

  3. C

    Only adopting mothers were covered, with commissioning mothers entirely excluded from any benefit under the amendment

  4. D

    The amendment extended benefit to grandmothers of newborn children for a period of fifty-two weeks

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. A 'commissioning mother' (a biological mother whose egg creates an embryo implanted in another woman in a surrogacy arrangement) and an 'adopting mother' who legally adopts a child below three months of age, both entitled to maternity benefit for twelve weeks from the date the child is handed over

The passage states the amendment extended benefit 'to a commissioning mother, defined as a biological mother who uses her own egg to create an embryo implanted in another woman in a surrogacy arrangement, and to an adopting mother who legally adopts a child below the age of three months. Both categories are entitled to maternity benefit for a period of twelve weeks calculated from the date the child is handed over to the relevant mother.'

Source note: Commissioning and Adopting Mothers

Question 45HardSection 11A - Creche Facility Requirement

According to the passage, what does Section 11A of the Maternity Benefit Act (as inserted by the 2017 amendment) require, and what visitation right does it grant?

  1. A

    Section 11A requires no creche facility whatsoever and instead mandates a one-time cash payment to cover private childcare costs

  2. B

    Section 11A requires every establishment having a prescribed number of employees to provide a creche facility within a prescribed distance, and obligates the employer to permit the woman four visits a day to the creche, inclusive of the interval for rest otherwise allowed to her

  3. C

    Section 11A applies only to government establishments and has no application to private sector employers

  4. D

    Section 11A grants the woman unlimited and unrestricted visits to the creche with no reference to any existing rest interval

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Section 11A requires every establishment having a prescribed number of employees to provide a creche facility within a prescribed distance, and obligates the employer to permit the woman four visits a day to the creche, inclusive of the interval for rest otherwise allowed to her

The passage states: 'Section 11A, requiring every establishment having a prescribed number of employees to provide a creche facility within a prescribed distance, either independently or in conjunction with shared common facilities, and obligating the employer to permit the woman four visits a day to the creche, inclusive of the interval for rest otherwise allowed to her.' The specific detail that the four visits include the existing rest interval (rather than being entirely additional time) is a precise feature highlighted in the passage.

Source note: Section 11A - Creche Facility Requirement

Passage or principleDual Threshold for Factory Definition

The Factories Act, 1948 establishes a comprehensive regulatory framework governing health, safety, welfare, and working conditions for workers employed in factories, defined under Section 2(m) using a dual threshold depending on whether the manufacturing process is carried on with the aid of power (ten or more workers) or without such aid (twenty or more workers). The Act's provisions span several distinct chapters addressing health (Chapter III), safety (Chapter IV), welfare (Chapter V), working hours of adults (Chapter VI), and annual leave with wages (Chapter VIII), among other matters. Chapter VI of the Act imposes important limits on working hours for adult workers, reflecting the legislative judgment that unregulated working hours pose risks to worker health and safety. Section 51 restricts weekly working hours to a maximum of 48 hours, while Section 54 limits daily working hours to a maximum of 9 hours. Section 56 addresses the concept of 'spread over', meaning the total period (including rest intervals) during which a worker is present at the factory, ordinarily restricting this spread over to 10.5 hours, subject to the Chief Inspector's limited power to extend it for specified reasons. Where a worker is required to work beyond these prescribed limits, Section 59 mandates payment of overtime wages at twice the worker's ordinary rate of wages, serving both a compensatory function for the additional burden and a deterrent function discouraging employers from routinely exceeding the statutory limits. The Act also addresses annual leave entitlements under Section 79, providing that an adult worker who has worked for 240 days or more in a factory during a calendar year is entitled to leave with wages calculated at the rate of one day for every twenty days of work performed during the previous calendar year, with associated provisions addressing carry-forward of unused leave subject to specified accumulation limits. Particular protective attention is directed towards more vulnerable categories of workers. Section 67 imposes an absolute prohibition on the employment of any child who has not completed his fourteenth year in any factory, reflecting heightened concern for child safety in what is considered an inherently more hazardous work environment compared to many other settings. Section 87 further empowers the State Government to make rules prohibiting or restricting the employment of women, adolescents, or children in any manufacturing process or operation found to expose them to serious risk of bodily injury, poisoning, or disease, allowing for targeted regulatory restrictions calibrated to the specific risks associated with particular hazardous operations, rather than a single undifferentiated standard applied uniformly to every worker regardless of the actual hazard profile of the relevant process.

Question 46EasyDual Threshold for Factory Definition

According to the passage, what is the dual threshold used under Section 2(m) of the Factories Act, 1948 to define a 'factory'?

  1. A

    A single uniform threshold of fifty workers applies regardless of whether power is used in the manufacturing process

  2. B

    Ten or more workers where the manufacturing process is carried on with the aid of power, or twenty or more workers where the manufacturing process is carried on without the aid of power

  3. C

    The threshold depends exclusively on the annual turnover of the establishment, with no reference to the number of workers employed

  4. D

    The threshold is one hundred workers in every case, with no distinction based on the use of power

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Ten or more workers where the manufacturing process is carried on with the aid of power, or twenty or more workers where the manufacturing process is carried on without the aid of power

The passage states the definition 'using a dual threshold depending on whether the manufacturing process is carried on with the aid of power (ten or more workers) or without such aid (twenty or more workers).' This power-based distinction in the numerical threshold is explicitly described.

Source note: Dual Threshold for Factory Definition

Question 47MediumWorking Hours Limits and Spread Over

From the passage, what are the respective limits on weekly working hours, daily working hours, and 'spread over' for adult workers under the Factories Act?

  1. A

    Weekly hours are limited to 60, daily hours have no separate limit, and spread over is limited to 15 hours

  2. B

    Section 51 restricts weekly working hours to a maximum of 48 hours, Section 54 limits daily working hours to a maximum of 9 hours, and Section 56 ordinarily restricts the spread over (total period including rest intervals) to 10.5 hours, subject to the Chief Inspector's limited power to extend it

  3. C

    There is no limit on weekly hours, only a daily limit of 8 hours applies

  4. D

    The spread over concept has been entirely abolished and has no continuing relevance under the Act

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Section 51 restricts weekly working hours to a maximum of 48 hours, Section 54 limits daily working hours to a maximum of 9 hours, and Section 56 ordinarily restricts the spread over (total period including rest intervals) to 10.5 hours, subject to the Chief Inspector's limited power to extend it

The passage specifies all three limits precisely: 'Section 51 restricts weekly working hours to a maximum of 48 hours, while Section 54 limits daily working hours to a maximum of 9 hours. Section 56 addresses the concept of spread over...ordinarily restricting this spread over to 10.5 hours, subject to the Chief Inspector's limited power to extend it for specified reasons.'

Source note: Working Hours Limits and Spread Over

Question 48MediumOvertime Wages - Dual Function

According to the passage, what dual function does the overtime wage requirement under Section 59 serve?

  1. A

    Overtime wages serve only a punitive function against the worker for working excessive hours, with no benefit to the worker

  2. B

    The requirement to pay overtime wages at twice the ordinary rate serves both a compensatory function for the additional burden on the worker and a deterrent function discouraging employers from routinely exceeding the statutory working hour limits

  3. C

    Overtime wages serve only an administrative record-keeping function with no actual financial compensation to the worker

  4. D

    The overtime wage provision applies only to managerial employees and has no application to ordinary factory workers

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The requirement to pay overtime wages at twice the ordinary rate serves both a compensatory function for the additional burden on the worker and a deterrent function discouraging employers from routinely exceeding the statutory working hour limits

The passage states: 'Section 59 mandates payment of overtime wages at twice the worker's ordinary rate of wages, serving both a compensatory function for the additional burden and a deterrent function discouraging employers from routinely exceeding the statutory limits.' This dual compensatory-deterrent rationale is explicitly identified.

Source note: Overtime Wages - Dual Function

Question 49MediumSection 67 - Absolute Prohibition for Children

From the passage, what is the nature of the restriction imposed by Section 67 on the employment of children in factories, and what is the underlying rationale?

  1. A

    Section 67 imposes a mere recommendation, not a binding legal prohibition, on the employment of children in factories

  2. B

    Section 67 imposes an absolute prohibition on the employment of any child who has not completed his fourteenth year in any factory, reflecting heightened concern for child safety in what is considered an inherently more hazardous work environment compared to many other settings

  3. C

    Section 67 permits the employment of children below fourteen years of age provided the parents give written consent

  4. D

    Section 67 applies only to female children and permits unrestricted employment of male children of any age in factories

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Section 67 imposes an absolute prohibition on the employment of any child who has not completed his fourteenth year in any factory, reflecting heightened concern for child safety in what is considered an inherently more hazardous work environment compared to many other settings

The passage states: 'Section 67 imposes an absolute prohibition on the employment of any child who has not completed his fourteenth year in any factory, reflecting heightened concern for child safety in what is considered an inherently more hazardous work environment compared to many other settings.' The word 'absolute' (as opposed to a mere restriction or regulated permission) is the key characterisation.

Source note: Section 67 - Absolute Prohibition for Children

Question 50HardSection 87 - Targeted vs Uniform Regulation

According to the passage, how does the regulatory approach under Section 87 (restricting employment of women, adolescents, or children in dangerous operations) differ from a uniform, undifferentiated standard?

  1. A

    Section 87 applies an identical blanket prohibition on all workers in every factory regardless of the specific process or operation involved

  2. B

    Section 87 allows for targeted regulatory restrictions calibrated to the specific risks associated with particular hazardous operations, rather than applying a single undifferentiated standard uniformly to every worker regardless of the actual hazard profile of the relevant process

  3. C

    Section 87 has been completely repealed and has no continuing operative effect under the current Factories Act

  4. D

    Section 87 applies only to factories located in coastal regions of India and excludes factories in landlocked states

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Section 87 allows for targeted regulatory restrictions calibrated to the specific risks associated with particular hazardous operations, rather than applying a single undifferentiated standard uniformly to every worker regardless of the actual hazard profile of the relevant process

The passage's concluding sentence describes the calibrated nature of Section 87: it 'empowers the State Government to make rules prohibiting or restricting the employment of women, adolescents, or children in any manufacturing process or operation found to expose them to serious risk...allowing for targeted regulatory restrictions calibrated to the specific risks associated with particular hazardous operations, rather than a single undifferentiated standard applied uniformly to every worker regardless of the actual hazard profile of the relevant process.' This contrast between targeted and uniform regulation is the key analytical point.

Source note: Section 87 - Targeted vs Uniform Regulation

Passage or principleQualifying Period for Bonus Eligibility

The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 establishes a statutory framework requiring employers in specified establishments to pay an annual bonus to eligible employees, reflecting a unique hybrid character combining elements of profit-sharing with a guaranteed minimum statutory entitlement. Under Section 8, every employee is entitled to be paid bonus by his employer in respect of an accounting year, provided he has worked in the establishment for not less than thirty working days in that accounting year, a relatively modest qualifying threshold compared to certain other labour welfare statutes that impose lengthier service requirements. The Act's distinctive structure is reflected in Sections 10 and 11, which together establish a statutory floor and ceiling for bonus payments. Section 10 mandates a minimum bonus of 8.33% of the salary or wages earned by the employee during the accounting year, or a prescribed minimum rupee amount, whichever is higher, payable even in years where the employer has suffered a loss, reflecting the legislative judgment that bonus, while connected to profitability through its calculation methodology in profitable years, nonetheless carries a guaranteed minimum statutory floor that does not depend on the employer's actual profit or loss position for that specific year. Section 11, by contrast, provides for a maximum bonus of 20% of salary or wages, payable where the available surplus calculated under the Act's prescribed formula exceeds the amount required to pay the minimum bonus, with the actual bonus percentage falling between the statutory minimum and maximum determined by the calculation of allocable surplus in accordance with the formula and schedules prescribed under the Act. The wage ceiling concept plays an important structural role in the bonus scheme. Eligibility for bonus may extend up to a certain wage level (the eligibility ceiling, subject to periodic governmental revision), but for employees whose wages exceed a separate, specified calculation ceiling, the bonus amount itself may be computed with reference to that lower, notional ceiling figure rather than the employee's actual, higher wage. This dual-ceiling structure (one for eligibility, a potentially different and lower one for calculation) ensures the scheme remains both inclusive in determining who is covered and administratively workable and consistent with the underlying profit-sharing rationale when calculating the actual bonus amount payable. Section 32 of the Act specifically excludes certain categories of establishments and employees from its scope altogether, including employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India and employees of government departments carrying on sovereign functions, recognising that certain sectors are either governed by alternative compensation arrangements or are considered inherently unsuited to the general profit-sharing bonus framework that underlies the Act's core design for ordinary commercial and industrial establishments. The Code on Wages, 2019 has since absorbed the substantive provisions of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 into a single consolidated wage code, while broadly retaining this underlying minimum-maximum bonus structure and the wage ceiling mechanism.

Question 51EasyQualifying Period for Bonus Eligibility

According to the passage, what qualifying period must an employee satisfy under Section 8 of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 to be entitled to bonus?

  1. A

    The employee must have worked in the establishment for not less than thirty working days in that accounting year

  2. B

    The employee must have worked for a minimum of five consecutive years in the establishment

  3. C

    There is no qualifying period whatsoever under Section 8, and every employee is automatically entitled regardless of days worked

  4. D

    The employee must have worked for at least 240 days in the accounting year, identical to the continuous service requirement under the Industrial Disputes Act

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. The employee must have worked in the establishment for not less than thirty working days in that accounting year

The passage states: 'every employee is entitled to be paid bonus by his employer in respect of an accounting year, provided he has worked in the establishment for not less than thirty working days in that accounting year, a relatively modest qualifying threshold.' The passage explicitly characterises this 30-day threshold as comparatively modest relative to other labour statutes.

Source note: Qualifying Period for Bonus Eligibility

Question 52MediumMinimum Bonus - Payable Regardless of Profit or Loss

From the passage, what is significant about the minimum bonus requirement under Section 10, particularly regarding the employer's profitability?

  1. A

    The minimum bonus is payable only in years where the employer has earned a substantial profit, and is entirely waived in loss-making years

  2. B

    Section 10 mandates a minimum bonus of 8.33% of salary or wages (or a prescribed minimum amount, whichever is higher), payable even in years where the employer has suffered a loss, reflecting that bonus carries a guaranteed minimum statutory floor that does not depend on the employer's actual profit or loss position for that specific year

  3. C

    The minimum bonus requirement applies only to government-owned establishments and has no application to private employers

  4. D

    Section 10 sets the minimum bonus at exactly 50% of wages in every case without exception

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Section 10 mandates a minimum bonus of 8.33% of salary or wages (or a prescribed minimum amount, whichever is higher), payable even in years where the employer has suffered a loss, reflecting that bonus carries a guaranteed minimum statutory floor that does not depend on the employer's actual profit or loss position for that specific year

The passage states explicitly: 'Section 10 mandates a minimum bonus of 8.33% of the salary or wages earned by the employee during the accounting year, or a prescribed minimum rupee amount, whichever is higher, payable even in years where the employer has suffered a loss, reflecting the legislative judgment that bonus...nonetheless carries a guaranteed minimum statutory floor that does not depend on the employer's actual profit or loss position for that specific year.' This guaranteed-floor characteristic, independent of profitability, is the key point.

Source note: Minimum Bonus - Payable Regardless of Profit or Loss

Question 53HardMaximum Bonus and Allocable Surplus

According to the passage, under what circumstance does an employee become entitled to the maximum bonus of 20% under Section 11, and how is the actual percentage between minimum and maximum determined?

  1. A

    The maximum bonus of 20% is paid automatically to every employee every year regardless of any other consideration

  2. B

    The maximum bonus is payable where the available surplus calculated under the Act's prescribed formula exceeds the amount required to pay the minimum bonus, with the actual bonus percentage between the statutory minimum and maximum determined by the calculation of allocable surplus in accordance with the formula and schedules prescribed under the Act

  3. C

    The maximum bonus applies only to employees who have worked for the establishment for more than twenty years continuously

  4. D

    The 20% maximum bonus is payable only to employees holding managerial positions, with non-managerial employees capped at the 8.33% minimum in all circumstances

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The maximum bonus is payable where the available surplus calculated under the Act's prescribed formula exceeds the amount required to pay the minimum bonus, with the actual bonus percentage between the statutory minimum and maximum determined by the calculation of allocable surplus in accordance with the formula and schedules prescribed under the Act

The passage states: 'Section 11...provides for a maximum bonus of 20% of salary or wages, payable where the available surplus calculated under the Act's prescribed formula exceeds the amount required to pay the minimum bonus, with the actual bonus percentage falling between the statutory minimum and maximum determined by the calculation of allocable surplus in accordance with the formula and schedules prescribed under the Act.' This establishes both the trigger condition for the maximum and the mechanism for determining the actual rate within the min-max band.

Source note: Maximum Bonus and Allocable Surplus

Question 54HardDual-Ceiling Structure - Eligibility vs Calculation

From the passage, what is the significance of the 'dual-ceiling structure' described in relation to bonus eligibility and calculation?

  1. A

    There is only a single ceiling under the Act, and the passage's reference to a dual-ceiling structure is inaccurate and should be disregarded entirely

  2. B

    Eligibility for bonus may extend up to a certain wage level (the eligibility ceiling), but for employees whose wages exceed a separate, specified calculation ceiling, the bonus amount itself may be computed with reference to that lower, notional ceiling figure rather than the employee's actual, higher wage, ensuring the scheme remains both inclusive for eligibility purposes and administratively workable and consistent with the profit-sharing rationale for calculation purposes

  3. C

    The dual-ceiling structure means that male and female employees are subject to entirely different and unrelated wage ceilings under the Act

  4. D

    The dual-ceiling structure refers exclusively to ceilings on the maximum number of working days an employee can work in a single accounting year

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Eligibility for bonus may extend up to a certain wage level (the eligibility ceiling), but for employees whose wages exceed a separate, specified calculation ceiling, the bonus amount itself may be computed with reference to that lower, notional ceiling figure rather than the employee's actual, higher wage, ensuring the scheme remains both inclusive for eligibility purposes and administratively workable and consistent with the profit-sharing rationale for calculation purposes

The passage explains: 'Eligibility for bonus may extend up to a certain wage level (the eligibility ceiling, subject to periodic governmental revision), but for employees whose wages exceed a separate, specified calculation ceiling, the bonus amount itself may be computed with reference to that lower, notional ceiling figure rather than the employee's actual, higher wage. This dual-ceiling structure...ensures the scheme remains both inclusive in determining who is covered and administratively workable and consistent with the underlying profit-sharing rationale when calculating the actual bonus amount payable.'

Source note: Dual-Ceiling Structure - Eligibility vs Calculation

Question 55MediumCode on Wages 2019 - Absorption of the Bonus Act

According to the passage, what change has the Code on Wages, 2019 made to the Payment of Bonus Act framework?

  1. A

    The Code on Wages, 2019 entirely abolished the concept of statutory bonus, removing any entitlement that previously existed under the Payment of Bonus Act

  2. B

    The Code on Wages, 2019 has absorbed the substantive provisions of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 into a single consolidated wage code, while broadly retaining the underlying minimum-maximum bonus structure and the wage ceiling mechanism

  3. C

    The Code on Wages, 2019 increased the minimum bonus from 8.33% to 50% in every case, dramatically expanding the prior entitlement

  4. D

    The Code on Wages, 2019 has no relationship whatsoever to the Payment of Bonus Act and addresses entirely separate and unrelated subject matter

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The Code on Wages, 2019 has absorbed the substantive provisions of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 into a single consolidated wage code, while broadly retaining the underlying minimum-maximum bonus structure and the wage ceiling mechanism

The passage's final sentence states: 'The Code on Wages, 2019 has since absorbed the substantive provisions of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 into a single consolidated wage code, while broadly retaining this underlying minimum-maximum bonus structure and the wage ceiling mechanism.' This describes a structural consolidation (absorption into a unified code) while preserving the substantive minimum-maximum and ceiling features described throughout the passage.

Source note: Code on Wages 2019 - Absorption of the Bonus Act

Passage or principleReason for Codification - Fragmentation Problem

India's labour law framework has historically been characterised by a multiplicity of central enactments, each addressing a particular aspect of the employment relationship, often enacted at different points across nearly a century of legislative history and reflecting varying drafting styles, definitions, and compliance mechanisms. This fragmentation generated significant complexity for both employers seeking to comply with overlapping and sometimes inconsistent requirements, and workers seeking to understand and enforce their rights across a confusing patchwork of statutes. In response, the Government of India undertook a comprehensive codification exercise, consolidating numerous previously separate central labour enactments into four principal labour codes. The Code on Wages, 2019 consolidates the Payment of Wages Act, 1936; the Minimum Wages Act, 1948; the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; and the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976, bringing together provisions relating to timely payment of wages, fixation of minimum wage rates, statutory bonus entitlements, and the prohibition of gender-based wage discrimination into a single framework. A significant innovation introduced by this Code is the concept of a national 'floor wage', empowering the Central Government to fix a wage floor having regard to minimum living standards, below which no minimum wage fixed by any appropriate government for any scheduled employment can fall, addressing long-standing concerns about wide and sometimes arbitrary disparities in minimum wage rates across different states. The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 consolidates the Trade Unions Act, 1926; the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, bringing together the foundational architecture of collective labour relations, including trade union registration and protection, certified conditions of employment, and the machinery for dispute resolution, lay-off, retrenchment, and closure. This Code introduced, for the first time at the central legislative level, a statutory framework for recognition of a 'negotiating union' or 'negotiating council' for collective bargaining purposes, addressing a long-standing gap previously highlighted in case law holding that the Trade Unions Act, 1926 itself imposed no obligation on employers to recognise a registered union. The Code also revised the threshold for mandatory prior government permission before lay-off, retrenchment, or closure, increasing it from 100 workers under the erstwhile Industrial Disputes Act to 300 workers. The Code on Social Security, 2020 consolidates social security related enactments including the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948; the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923; the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; and the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, into a unified framework addressing retirement savings, health insurance, employment injury compensation, maternity benefits, and gratuity. The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 consolidates the Factories Act, 1948; the Mines Act, 1952; the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; and various sector-specific enactments addressing categories such as plantation workers, building and construction workers, and inter-state migrant workmen, into a single framework governing workplace safety, health, and working conditions across multiple sectors.

Question 56EasyReason for Codification - Fragmentation Problem

According to the passage, what was the central problem that motivated the Government of India's comprehensive labour law codification exercise?

  1. A

    The problem was that India had too few labour laws, and the codification exercise was undertaken to create entirely new categories of labour regulation that did not previously exist

  2. B

    India's labour law framework was historically characterised by a multiplicity of central enactments, each addressing a particular aspect of the employment relationship, enacted at different points across nearly a century with varying drafting styles, definitions, and compliance mechanisms, generating significant complexity for both employers and workers

  3. C

    The problem was that all previous labour laws were identical in their substantive content, making codification purely a cosmetic exercise with no practical significance

  4. D

    The codification was undertaken exclusively to reduce the financial cost of printing physical copies of labour statutes

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. India's labour law framework was historically characterised by a multiplicity of central enactments, each addressing a particular aspect of the employment relationship, enacted at different points across nearly a century with varying drafting styles, definitions, and compliance mechanisms, generating significant complexity for both employers and workers

The passage opens by describing the motivating problem: 'India's labour law framework has historically been characterised by a multiplicity of central enactments, each addressing a particular aspect of the employment relationship, often enacted at different points across nearly a century of legislative history and reflecting varying drafting styles, definitions, and compliance mechanisms. This fragmentation generated significant complexity for both employers...and workers.'

Source note: Reason for Codification - Fragmentation Problem

Question 57MediumCode on Wages - Floor Wage Innovation

From the passage, what is the significance of the 'floor wage' concept introduced by the Code on Wages, 2019?

  1. A

    The floor wage is a purely symbolic concept with no binding legal effect on any government's minimum wage fixation power

  2. B

    The floor wage empowers the Central Government to fix a wage floor having regard to minimum living standards, below which no minimum wage fixed by any appropriate government for any scheduled employment can fall, addressing long-standing concerns about wide and sometimes arbitrary disparities in minimum wage rates across different states

  3. C

    The floor wage applies only to government employees and has no relevance to minimum wages fixed for private sector scheduled employments

  4. D

    The floor wage concept was proposed but ultimately rejected and never incorporated into the final Code on Wages

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The floor wage empowers the Central Government to fix a wage floor having regard to minimum living standards, below which no minimum wage fixed by any appropriate government for any scheduled employment can fall, addressing long-standing concerns about wide and sometimes arbitrary disparities in minimum wage rates across different states

The passage states: 'A significant innovation introduced by this Code is the concept of a national floor wage, empowering the Central Government to fix a wage floor having regard to minimum living standards, below which no minimum wage fixed by any appropriate government for any scheduled employment can fall, addressing long-standing concerns about wide and sometimes arbitrary disparities in minimum wage rates across different states.'

Source note: Code on Wages - Floor Wage Innovation

Question 58HardIndustrial Relations Code - Negotiating Union Innovation

According to the passage, what gap in the pre-existing legal framework did the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 address through its negotiating union/council provisions?

  1. A

    The Code addressed a gap relating to the taxation of trade union subscription fees, with no connection to collective bargaining recognition

  2. B

    The Code introduced, for the first time at the central legislative level, a statutory framework for recognition of a negotiating union or negotiating council for collective bargaining purposes, addressing a long-standing gap previously highlighted in case law holding that the Trade Unions Act, 1926 itself imposed no obligation on employers to recognise a registered union

  3. C

    The Code addressed a gap relating to the minimum age requirement for trade union office-bearers, with no connection to collective bargaining

  4. D

    There was no gap whatsoever in the pre-existing framework, and the negotiating union provisions were purely a redundant restatement of existing law with no substantive change

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The Code introduced, for the first time at the central legislative level, a statutory framework for recognition of a negotiating union or negotiating council for collective bargaining purposes, addressing a long-standing gap previously highlighted in case law holding that the Trade Unions Act, 1926 itself imposed no obligation on employers to recognise a registered union

The passage states: 'This Code introduced, for the first time at the central legislative level, a statutory framework for recognition of a negotiating union or negotiating council for collective bargaining purposes, addressing a long-standing gap previously highlighted in case law holding that the Trade Unions Act, 1926 itself imposed no obligation on employers to recognise a registered union.' This directly references the gap previously discussed in case law regarding union recognition (such as in the Food Corporation of India Staff Union case).

Source note: Industrial Relations Code - Negotiating Union Innovation

Question 59MediumThreshold Change for Government Permission

From the passage, what change did the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 make to the threshold for mandatory prior government permission before lay-off, retrenchment, or closure?

  1. A

    The Code eliminated the permission requirement entirely for every establishment regardless of size

  2. B

    The Code increased the threshold from 100 workers under the erstwhile Industrial Disputes Act to 300 workers

  3. C

    The Code reduced the threshold from 300 workers to 50 workers, expanding the permission requirement to a far larger number of establishments

  4. D

    The threshold remained completely unchanged at 100 workers under both the old and new frameworks

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The Code increased the threshold from 100 workers under the erstwhile Industrial Disputes Act to 300 workers

The passage states: 'The Code also revised the threshold for mandatory prior government permission before lay-off, retrenchment, or closure, increasing it from 100 workers under the erstwhile Industrial Disputes Act to 300 workers.' This numerical increase (100 to 300) is the specific change described.

Source note: Threshold Change for Government Permission

Question 60HardOverall Structure of the Four Codes

According to the passage, how are the various pre-existing labour enactments distributed across the four consolidated codes described?

  1. A

    All pre-existing labour enactments were merged into a single code with no further subdivision of any kind

  2. B

    The four codes are organised thematically: the Code on Wages addresses wage-related statutes (Payment of Wages, Minimum Wages, Bonus, Equal Remuneration); the Industrial Relations Code addresses collective relations statutes (Trade Unions, Standing Orders, Industrial Disputes); the Code on Social Security addresses social security statutes (epf, esi, Employees Compensation, Maternity Benefit, Gratuity); and the Occupational Safety Health and Working Conditions Code addresses workplace safety and conditions statutes (Factories, Mines, Contract Labour, and various sector-specific enactments)

  3. C

    The four codes are organised purely alphabetically by the name of the original enactment, with no thematic basis for the grouping

  4. D

    Only two codes were ultimately created, with the other two abandoned during the legislative process and never enacted

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The four codes are organised thematically: the Code on Wages addresses wage-related statutes (Payment of Wages, Minimum Wages, Bonus, Equal Remuneration); the Industrial Relations Code addresses collective relations statutes (Trade Unions, Standing Orders, Industrial Disputes); the Code on Social Security addresses social security statutes (epf, esi, Employees Compensation, Maternity Benefit, Gratuity); and the Occupational Safety Health and Working Conditions Code addresses workplace safety and conditions statutes (Factories, Mines, Contract Labour, and various sector-specific enactments)

The passage's overall structure, read as a whole, demonstrates this thematic organisation: it describes the Code on Wages consolidating wage-related statutes, the Industrial Relations Code consolidating collective relations statutes, the Code on Social Security consolidating social security statutes, and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code consolidating workplace safety and conditions statutes, with each paragraph of the passage dedicated to one of these four thematically organised codes and its constituent absorbed enactments.

Source note: Overall Structure of the Four Codes