CLAT UG question bank

English Language MCQs for CLAT UG, Page 9

CLAT UG English Language questions 191-214 of 310, with answer keys and explanations covering central ideas, inference, tone, vocabulary in context, paragraph structure, and passage interpretation.

310 questions60 topics191-214 on this page
Start adaptive practiceBrowse CLAT UG

Coverage

Topics in this subject

Practice passage-based CLAT UG questions with answers for English, current affairs, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, and quantitative techniques.

  • Adaptive Reuse of Old Buildings5
  • Authenticity in Building Restoration5
  • Benches and the Design of Rest5
  • Checklists and Professional Judgment5
  • Cinema and Shared Attention5
  • Community Kitchens and Reciprocity5
  • Convenience and the Loss of Skill5
  • Corrections and Trust in Public Records5
  • Defaults and Meaningful Choice5
  • Definitions and Productive Disagreement5
  • Digitising Archives Without Losing Context5
  • Expert Consensus and Honest Dissent5
  • Expertise and Plain Language5
  • Footnotes and Intellectual Honesty5
  • Imitation and Originality in Art5
  • Labels and Changing Categories5
  • Listening and Historical Silence5
  • Lost Objects and Public Stories5
  • Manual Skills and Digital Convenience5
  • Maps and Public Knowledge5
  • Maps and the Appearance of Objectivity5
  • Maps of Distance and Travel Time5
  • Marginal Notes and Active Reading5
  • Margins and the History of Reading5
  • Memory, Archives, and Historical Evidence5
  • Metrics and Classroom Participation5
  • Missing Data and Honest Conclusions5
  • Museum Lighting and Care5
  • Names, Pronunciation, and Belonging5
  • Photographs as Historical Evidence5
  • Public Apologies and Institutional Memory5
  • Public Clocks and Shared Time5
  • Public Dashboards and Legibility5
  • Public Notices and Actionable Clarity5
  • Public Space and Urban Belonging5
  • Queues and Everyday Fairness5
  • Quiet Rooms and Productive Attention5
  • Rankings and the Illusion of Exact Order5
  • Readable Law and Necessary Precision5
  • Reading Aloud and Textual Attention5
  • Reading and Productive Difficulty5
  • Recipes, Measurement, and Judgment5
  • Reconstructing Lost Performances5
  • Recording Endangered Languages5
  • Repair and Public Memory5
  • Repair, Memory, and Material History5
  • Repair, Ownership and Product Design5
  • Restoration and Honest Repair5
  • Revision and the Value of Delay5
  • Scientific Models and Useful Simplification10
  • Seeds and Shared Memory5
  • Silence in Public Memorials5
  • Small Errors and Scientific Credibility5
  • Speed, Technology, and Public Judgment5
  • Standardised Tests as Proxies5
  • Translation and Meaning10
  • Urban Sound and Public Memory5
  • Urban Trees and Public Maintenance5
  • Waiting as Public Infrastructure5
  • Weather Diaries and Ordinary Evidence5
Passage or principleOriginal non-fiction passage

Writers are often advised to revise immediately while their ideas remain fresh. Freshness helps them remember what they intended, but that memory can also conceal what the page fails to say. A short delay changes the reader's relationship with the draft. Phrases that once seemed inevitable become choices again. Missing links and unsupported assumptions are easier to notice when intention no longer fills every gap. Delay is not automatically productive. Waiting without returning is abandonment, and excessive distance may weaken the writer's grasp of specialised detail. The useful interval depends on the task. Revision benefits from alternating closeness and distance. One protects the purpose of the work, while the other reveals whether that purpose has actually become visible to a reader.

Question 191MediumRevision and the Value of Delay

Which statement best captures the central idea of the passage?

  1. A

    All revision should be delayed for months.

  2. B

    Effective revision may require both immediate knowledge and later distance.

  3. C

    Writers should forget their original purpose.

  4. D

    Fresh ideas never assist revision.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Effective revision may require both immediate knowledge and later distance.

B captures the value of alternating closeness and distance.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 20, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 192HardRevision and the Value of Delay

Why can immediate familiarity conceal weaknesses?

  1. A

    Every fresh draft is complete.

  2. B

    Specialised detail is unnecessary.

  3. C

    Readers always know the writer's intention.

  4. D

    The writer may mentally supply connections that the page lacks.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. The writer may mentally supply connections that the page lacks.

D follows from the first two paragraphs.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 20, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 193MediumRevision and the Value of Delay

What does it mean for phrases to "become choices again"?

  1. A

    Distance allows the writer to reconsider wording that previously felt fixed.

  2. B

    The draft selects its own language.

  3. C

    Every phrase must be deleted.

  4. D

    Revision becomes impossible.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Distance allows the writer to reconsider wording that previously felt fixed.

A captures the effect of renewed critical distance.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 20, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 194HardRevision and the Value of Delay

Why does the author reject unlimited delay?

  1. A

    Every task has the same schedule.

  2. B

    Purpose never matters.

  3. C

    Too much distance can reduce command of detail or prevent return.

  4. D

    All delayed work is published.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Too much distance can reduce command of detail or prevent return.

C reflects the qualifications in the third paragraph.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 20, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 195EasyRevision and the Value of Delay

Which description best fits the tone of the passage?

  1. A

    Hostile and dismissive

  2. B

    Reflective and balanced

  3. C

    Comic and exaggerated

  4. D

    Entirely nostalgic

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Reflective and balanced

B reflects the careful weighing of competing benefits.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 20, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Passage or principleOriginal non-fiction passage

A debate can continue for hours because participants use the same word differently. Asking for a definition may clarify the dispute, but definitions do more than report fixed meanings. In policy, a definition decides what falls within a category and who receives protection or bears a duty. A narrow definition of work, for example, may exclude unpaid care even when that activity sustains an economy. This does not mean that every definition is arbitrary. Language has established uses, and a useful definition must fit the purpose and evidence of the discussion. Precision can become misleading when it hides a contested choice behind technical wording. Defining terms is therefore part of reasoning, not a preliminary task completed before reasoning begins.

Question 196MediumDefinitions and Productive Disagreement

What is the passage mainly concerned with?

  1. A

    Showing that words have no established uses

  2. B

    Proving that technical language is always deceptive

  3. C

    Explaining how definitions shape rather than merely clarify reasoning

  4. D

    Arguing that policy needs no categories

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Explaining how definitions shape rather than merely clarify reasoning

C captures the active role of definitions.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 20, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 197HardDefinitions and Productive Disagreement

Why can a narrow definition of work have practical consequences?

  1. A

    It may exclude activities and people from policy recognition.

  2. B

    It makes every activity paid.

  3. C

    It removes all economic categories.

  4. D

    It guarantees agreement.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. It may exclude activities and people from policy recognition.

A follows from the policy example.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 20, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 198MediumDefinitions and Productive Disagreement

Which claim would the author most likely reject?

  1. A

    Definitions should fit purpose and evidence.

  2. B

    Established usage constrains definitions.

  3. C

    Technical precision may conceal choices.

  4. D

    Definitions are neutral labels with no effect on inclusion.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Definitions are neutral labels with no effect on inclusion.

D conflicts with the central argument.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 20, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 199HardDefinitions and Productive Disagreement

What does the example of unpaid care illustrate?

  1. A

    All care work must be identical.

  2. B

    Category boundaries can distribute recognition and protection.

  3. C

    Economic activity cannot be defined.

  4. D

    Unpaid activity has no social value.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Category boundaries can distribute recognition and protection.

B identifies the example's role.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 20, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 200MediumDefinitions and Productive Disagreement

Which statement best follows from the passage?

  1. A

    Reasoning starts only after every word has one permanent meaning.

  2. B

    Ambiguity should never be discussed.

  3. C

    Choosing a definition may itself require justification.

  4. D

    Policy definitions cannot be revised.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Choosing a definition may itself require justification.

C follows from the concluding sentence.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 20, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Passage or principleOriginal non-fiction passage

A checklist can prevent an expert from overlooking a routine but essential step. Its value is greatest where tasks are repeated, consequences are serious, and memory is vulnerable to interruption. A checklist cannot contain every feature of a difficult case. If followed without judgment, it may encourage users to treat completion of boxes as proof that the underlying work was sound. Good checklists therefore identify minimum actions while leaving room to record exceptions. They are revised when practice reveals missing steps or unnecessary burdens. The choice is not between rules and expertise. A checklist should protect attention from avoidable error so that professional judgment can focus on what is unusual.

Question 201MediumChecklists and Professional Judgment

Which statement best captures the central idea of the passage?

  1. A

    Checklists should support rather than replace professional judgment.

  2. B

    Experts should rely only on memory.

  3. C

    Every case can be reduced to identical boxes.

  4. D

    Revision weakens a checklist.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Checklists should support rather than replace professional judgment.

A captures the relationship proposed by the author.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 21, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 202HardChecklists and Professional Judgment

When is a checklist particularly valuable?

  1. A

    When consequences are trivial

  2. B

    When repeated work contains essential steps vulnerable to omission

  3. C

    When no task is repeated

  4. D

    When judgment is prohibited

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. When repeated work contains essential steps vulnerable to omission

B follows from the first paragraph.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 21, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 203MediumChecklists and Professional Judgment

Which practice would the author most likely criticise?

  1. A

    Recording exceptions

  2. B

    Revising an outdated list

  3. C

    Using a list to protect attention

  4. D

    Treating checked boxes as conclusive proof of quality

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Treating checked boxes as conclusive proof of quality

D reflects the warning in the second paragraph.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 21, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 204HardChecklists and Professional Judgment

What is the function of the third paragraph?

  1. A

    To reject minimum standards

  2. B

    To prove that lists never change

  3. C

    To describe features of a well-designed and adaptable checklist

  4. D

    To replace professional training

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. To describe features of a well-designed and adaptable checklist

C accurately describes the paragraph's role.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 21, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 205EasyChecklists and Professional Judgment

Which description best fits the tone of the passage?

  1. A

    Practical and balanced

  2. B

    Hostile and sarcastic

  3. C

    Nostalgic and personal

  4. D

    Entirely doubtful

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Practical and balanced

A reflects the measured evaluation of benefits and limits.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 21, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Passage or principleOriginal non-fiction passage

Calls for plain legal language are sometimes treated as demands to remove every technical term. That would exchange one problem for another. A specialised term can condense a settled concept more accurately than a long paraphrase. Difficulty becomes needless when sentences are crowded with qualifications that could be organised, or when traditional phrases survive without adding meaning. Precision is not measured by length or obscurity. A readable legal text can define necessary terms, use consistent structure, and provide examples without weakening the rule. Readers should be able to locate duties and exceptions before seeking expert interpretation. Plain language is not the opposite of legal accuracy. It is the discipline of making complexity visible instead of hiding it in form.

Question 206MediumReadable Law and Necessary Precision

What is the passage mainly concerned with?

  1. A

    Removing every technical legal term

  2. B

    Reconciling readable legal writing with necessary precision

  3. C

    Proving that long sentences are always accurate

  4. D

    Replacing rules with examples

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Reconciling readable legal writing with necessary precision

B captures the passage's central reconciliation.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 21, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 207HardReadable Law and Necessary Precision

Why may a technical term be useful?

  1. A

    It always makes law inaccessible.

  2. B

    It prevents consistent drafting.

  3. C

    It may express a settled concept accurately and concisely.

  4. D

    It removes the need for definition.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. It may express a settled concept accurately and concisely.

C follows from the first paragraph.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 21, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 208MediumReadable Law and Necessary Precision

Which statement would the author most likely support?

  1. A

    Obscurity is not evidence of precision.

  2. B

    Every qualification should be deleted.

  3. C

    Readers should never see exceptions.

  4. D

    Examples necessarily weaken rules.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Obscurity is not evidence of precision.

A follows from the second and fourth paragraphs.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 21, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 209HardReadable Law and Necessary Precision

What does the final sentence suggest?

  1. A

    Complexity must be concealed.

  2. B

    Legal accuracy requires archaic language.

  3. C

    Form matters more than meaning.

  4. D

    Good drafting presents complexity in an intelligible structure.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Good drafting presents complexity in an intelligible structure.

D captures the concluding contrast.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 21, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 210EasyReadable Law and Necessary Precision

Which description best fits the author's approach?

  1. A

    Entirely opposed to legal terminology

  2. B

    Reform-oriented but attentive to legal accuracy

  3. C

    Indifferent to readers

  4. D

    Defensive of unnecessary obscurity

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Reform-oriented but attentive to legal accuracy

B reflects the balanced reform proposed.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 21, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Passage or principleOriginal non-fiction passage

When most specialists agree, a non-specialist has good reason to take that agreement seriously. Consensus gathers many independent judgments and often reflects evidence that one reader cannot assess alone. Consensus is not a vote that makes a claim true. Experts may share assumptions, institutions may reward conformity, and new evidence may justify revision. These possibilities do not make every outsider's objection equally strong. Responsible dissent engages with the best evidence, explains where prevailing reasoning fails, and states what could change the dissenter's view. Merely pointing out that experts have been wrong before is insufficient. Trust in expertise should therefore be neither blind nor casually dismissive. It should be proportionate to the quality, independence, and openness of the process producing agreement.

Question 211MediumExpert Consensus and Honest Dissent

Which statement best captures the central idea of the passage?

  1. A

    Expert agreement is always final.

  2. B

    Every outsider's view deserves equal weight.

  3. C

    Consensus deserves qualified trust while serious dissent must engage with evidence.

  4. D

    Past expert error makes current evidence irrelevant.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Consensus deserves qualified trust while serious dissent must engage with evidence.

C captures the balanced account of consensus and dissent.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 22, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 212HardExpert Consensus and Honest Dissent

Why may consensus assist a non-specialist?

  1. A

    It combines informed judgments and evidence the person may not assess alone.

  2. B

    It guarantees permanent truth.

  3. C

    It removes every shared assumption.

  4. D

    It prevents revision.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. It combines informed judgments and evidence the person may not assess alone.

A follows from the first paragraph.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 22, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 213MediumExpert Consensus and Honest Dissent

Which objection would the author consider insufficient by itself?

  1. A

    A new study contradicts the accepted result.

  2. B

    Experts have been mistaken on some earlier occasions.

  3. C

    The consensus relies on undisclosed data.

  4. D

    A method contains an identified error.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Experts have been mistaken on some earlier occasions.

B is expressly rejected as insufficient.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 22, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 214HardExpert Consensus and Honest Dissent

Which feature would most increase justified trust in a consensus?

  1. A

    Punishing every dissenter

  2. B

    Preventing access to evidence

  3. C

    Relying on one institution

  4. D

    Independent review and openness to correction

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Independent review and openness to correction

D follows from the final paragraph.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 22, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Continue revision

Current Affairs including General Knowledge310 questions with explanationsLegal Reasoning310 questions with explanationsLogical Reasoning310 questions with explanationsQuantitative Techniques310 questions with explanations