CLAT UG question bank

Legal Reasoning MCQs for CLAT UG

CLAT UG Legal Reasoning questions 1-23 of 310, with answer keys and explanations covering self-contained legal principles, factual application, changes in outcome, rights, duties, liability, and remedies.

310 questions61 topics1-23 on this page

Start adaptive practice Browse CLAT UG

Coverage

Topics in this subject

Practice passage-based CLAT UG questions with answers for English, current affairs, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, and quantitative techniques.

Agency and Authority10
Agreements in Restraint of Trade5
Anticipatory Breach of Contract5
Appropriation of Payments5
Assault and Battery5
Assignment of Contractual Rights5
Authority of an Agent and Ratification5
Bailment and Duty of Care5
Breach of Condition and Warranty5
Caveat Emptor and Quality of Goods5
Coercion in Contracts5
Communication and Revocation of Proposals5
Contingent Contracts5
Contract of Guarantee and Surety5
Contract of Indemnity5
Contractual Misrepresentation5
Contributory Negligence and Apportionment5
Defamation and Defences5
Defamation and Responsible Publication5
Doctrine of Election in Property Transfers5
Doctrine of Part Performance5
False Imprisonment5
Fraud and Contractual Consent5
Frustration of Contract5
Fundamental Rights and Proportionality5
Guarantee Obtained by Misrepresentation5
Informed Consent to Medical Treatment5
Intervening Acts and Causation5
Joint Promisors and Contribution5
Malicious Prosecution5
Mistake and Restitution5
Necessaries Supplied to an Incapable Person5
Negligence and Standard of Care5
Non-Gratuitous Acts and Restitution5
Novation and Alteration of Contract5
Occupier Liability to Visitors5
Offer, Acceptance, and Revocation5
Pledge and Rights of the Pawnee5
Preparation and Criminal Attempt5
Private Defence of the Person5
Private Necessity and Property Damage5
Privity and Third-Party Rights5
Promissory Estoppel and Public Interest5
Public Nuisance and Special Damage5
Remission and Waiver of Contractual Performance5
Remoteness of Contractual Damages5
Res Ipsa Loquitur5
Right of Private Defence5
Rights and Duties of a Finder of Goods5
Rights of an Unpaid Seller5
Sale and Agreement to Sell5
Sale by a Non-Owner5
Sale by Sample and Description5
Stipulated Damages and Reasonable Compensation5
Strict Liability and Escape5
Time as the Essence of Contract5
Trespass to Goods and Conversion5
Trespass to Land and Necessity5
Undue Influence in Contracts5
Unlawful Object and Severability5
Vicarious Liability5

Passage or principleOriginal legal principle and fact scenarios

Negligence arises when a person who owes a duty of care fails to take the precautions that a reasonable person would take in the circumstances, and that failure causes a foreseeable kind of harm. The law does not demand perfect safety. It compares the burden of a precaution with the likelihood and seriousness of the risk. A simple precaution against a serious and probable injury is more likely to be required than an expensive precaution against a remote and minor danger. A person is generally responsible only for harm of a foreseeable kind. The precise manner in which the harm occurs need not be predicted. If an unguarded pit foreseeably creates a risk of physical injury, the person responsible for it cannot escape liability merely because the victim fell after being startled rather than because the victim failed to see the pit. The claimant must also show factual causation. Ask whether the harm would probably have occurred even if the defendant had taken reasonable care. If the answer is yes, the breach did not factually cause that harm. Where two independent acts each materially contribute to one injury, both wrongdoers may be treated as causes. A claimant's own lack of reasonable care does not automatically erase the defendant's liability. If it contributes to the injury, damages may be reduced in proportion to the claimant's responsibility. However, a defendant cannot rely on the claimant's conduct when that conduct was a reasonable response to the very danger created by the defendant. Apply only these principles. Do not assume any special statutory rule or professional standard unless a question expressly provides one.

Question 1MediumNegligence and Standard of Care

A grocery store notices water spreading across a busy entrance. A warning cone is available beside the door, but the manager decides to place it later. Mira slips before it is placed and fractures her wrist. Which conclusion best follows?

A
The store is not liable because no place can be perfectly safe.
B
The store is likely liable because a simple precaution could address a foreseeable risk of serious injury.
C
The store is liable only if the manager intended Mira to fall.
D
The store is not liable because customers must discover every visible danger themselves.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The store is likely liable because a simple precaution could address a foreseeable risk of serious injury.

Option B applies the reasonable care test: the risk was foreseeable and the burden of placing a nearby cone was slight. A misuses the rule that perfect safety is not required. C wrongly adds intention, and D creates an absolute rule against claimants.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 1. Structure reviewed against the official CLAT UG 2025 question paper and CLAT UG 2026 syllabus.

Question 2HardNegligence and Standard of Care

A bus operator negligently delays replacing a worn seat cover. During the journey, lightning strikes the bus and injures Dev while he is sitting on that seat. The injury would have been identical with a new cover. Is the operator liable for Dev's injury under the passage?

A
Yes, because any breach of duty makes the operator liable for every later injury.
B
Yes, because Dev was physically present on the defective seat.
C
No, because replacing the cover would not probably have prevented the injury.
D
No, because lightning damage is never legally actionable.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. No, because replacing the cover would not probably have prevented the injury.

Option C is correct because the injury would have occurred even if reasonable care had been taken regarding the cover. A ignores causation, B relies only on physical location, and D states an unsupported universal immunity for lightning-related harm.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 1. Structure reviewed against the official CLAT UG 2025 question paper and CLAT UG 2026 syllabus.

Question 3MediumNegligence and Standard of Care

Rohan leaves a deep pit unguarded beside a public path. A cyclist swerves after a dog barks, falls into the pit, and is injured. Which option is most accurate?

A
Rohan is not liable because he could not predict that a dog would bark.
B
Rohan is not liable because the cyclist moved toward the pit voluntarily.
C
Rohan is liable only if he knew the particular cyclist would use the path.
D
Rohan may be liable because physical injury from the unguarded pit was foreseeable even if the exact sequence was not.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Rohan may be liable because physical injury from the unguarded pit was foreseeable even if the exact sequence was not.

Option D directly applies the rule that the kind of harm, not its precise manner, must be foreseeable. A focuses too narrowly on the barking dog. B does not establish unreasonable conduct, and C wrongly requires knowledge of the individual victim.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 1. Structure reviewed against the official CLAT UG 2025 question paper and CLAT UG 2026 syllabus.

Question 4MediumNegligence and Standard of Care

A theatre negligently blocks a marked exit with boxes. When smoke enters the hall, Leena climbs over the boxes to escape and injures her ankle. Her response is reasonable in the emergency. Can the theatre reduce liability by blaming her for climbing?

A
No, because her reasonable response was prompted by the danger associated with the blocked exit.
B
Yes, because any action contributing physically to an injury removes the defendant's liability.
C
Yes, because a claimant must remain still whenever an exit is obstructed.
D
No, because contributory negligence can never reduce damages.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. No, because her reasonable response was prompted by the danger associated with the blocked exit.

Option A follows the rule protecting a reasonable response to the danger created by the defendant. B and C impose unreasonable absolute duties. D is too broad because genuine lack of care by a claimant may reduce damages.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 1. Structure reviewed against the official CLAT UG 2025 question paper and CLAT UG 2026 syllabus.

Question 5HardNegligence and Standard of Care

Two factories independently release chemicals into a stream on the same day. Evidence shows that each release materially contributed to the destruction of a fish farm downstream. Which conclusion best follows?

A
Neither factory is a cause because no single release produced the whole loss.
B
Both factories may be treated as causes because each act materially contributed to one injury.
C
Only the factory that released chemicals first can be a cause.
D
The fish farm must prove that both factories acted with a shared intention.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Both factories may be treated as causes because each act materially contributed to one injury.

Option B applies the express rule on independent acts that materially contribute to one injury. A and C wrongly require one exclusive cause, while D imports a requirement of shared intention that negligence does not demand.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 1. Structure reviewed against the official CLAT UG 2025 question paper and CLAT UG 2026 syllabus.

Passage or principleOriginal legal principle and fact scenarios

Assume that a constitutional right to freedom of expression protects peaceful communication of ideas, including speech that criticises public authorities. The right is not absolute. The State may restrict expression to pursue a legitimate public purpose, such as preventing violence, protecting the privacy of others, or maintaining the fair administration of an examination. A restriction is valid only if it satisfies all parts of a proportionality test. First, the restriction must pursue a legitimate purpose. Second, there must be a rational connection between the restriction and that purpose. Third, no equally effective but less restrictive measure should be reasonably available. Fourth, the public benefit of the restriction must be proportionate to the harm it causes to protected expression. Mere administrative convenience is not enough to justify a serious burden on a right. Nor may the State defend a restriction by inventing a purpose after the decision has been challenged. The actual purpose must be identifiable from the decision and its surrounding circumstances. Rules based on the content of speech require especially careful examination. A temporary limit on revealing the questions of an ongoing competitive examination may be closely connected with fairness. A permanent ban on every discussion of the examination, including criticism after results are declared, would burden much more speech than the stated purpose requires. When applying these principles, courts assess the evidence available to the decision-maker. A remote or purely speculative danger carries less weight than a specific and supported risk. Apply only the test stated above.

Question 6HardFundamental Rights and Proportionality

During a two-hour entrance examination, the authority temporarily blocks candidates from posting live photographs of the question paper. The block ends when the examination ends. Which conclusion is most defensible?

A
The block is invalid because freedom of expression can never be restricted.
B
The block is invalid unless it also prohibits all discussion after the examination.
C
The block is valid only if every candidate agrees to it individually.
D
The block is likely proportionate because it is narrow in time and connected with examination fairness.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. The block is likely proportionate because it is narrow in time and connected with examination fairness.

Option D is best because the restriction targets live disclosure during the examination and ends with the risk. A treats the right as absolute, B demands a broader measure, and C adds a consent requirement absent from the stated test.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 1. Structure reviewed against the official CLAT UG 2025 question paper and CLAT UG 2026 syllabus.

Question 7MediumFundamental Rights and Proportionality

A city prohibits a peaceful poster solely because it criticises the mayor. Officials later claim that the ban protected traffic, although the original decision and surrounding facts contain no reference to traffic. Is that later claim sufficient?

A
No, because the State cannot invent a new purpose after the restriction is challenged.
B
Yes, because any purpose mentioned in court automatically validates a restriction.
C
Yes, because criticism of public authorities receives no constitutional protection.
D
No, because traffic regulation can never be a legitimate public purpose.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. No, because the State cannot invent a new purpose after the restriction is challenged.

Option A applies the rule that the actual purpose must be identifiable at the time of decision. B permits retrospective invention, C contradicts the protection for criticism, and D is too broad because traffic safety could be legitimate in an appropriate case.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 1. Structure reviewed against the official CLAT UG 2025 question paper and CLAT UG 2026 syllabus.

Question 8MediumFundamental Rights and Proportionality

To protect patient privacy, a hospital run by the State bans visitors from photographing medical files displayed at a records desk. Which element is most clearly satisfied?

A
The rule causes no burden at all on expression.
B
No less restrictive measure could ever be imagined.
C
There is a rational connection between preventing photographs of files and protecting privacy.
D
The rule is valid because hospitals are outside the Constitution.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. There is a rational connection between preventing photographs of files and protecting privacy.

Option C identifies the clearest connection between the means and the purpose. A denies any expressive burden, B makes an unjustified absolute claim about alternatives, and D contradicts the assumption that the hospital is State-run.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 1. Structure reviewed against the official CLAT UG 2025 question paper and CLAT UG 2026 syllabus.

Question 9HardFundamental Rights and Proportionality

A university bans every student publication for six months to prevent one leaked answer key from circulating. Secure access controls could stop circulation of the key just as effectively. Which part of the test is most directly violated?

A
The requirement that expression must concern public authorities
B
The requirement to use an equally effective, less restrictive measure when reasonably available
C
The rule that every restriction must be permanent
D
The requirement that all restrictions protect privacy rather than examination fairness

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The requirement to use an equally effective, less restrictive measure when reasonably available

Option B is correct because a targeted and equally effective alternative is available. A invents a limit on protected expression, while C and D state rules that do not appear in the passage.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 1. Structure reviewed against the official CLAT UG 2025 question paper and CLAT UG 2026 syllabus.

Question 10MediumFundamental Rights and Proportionality

A permanent ban prevents all former candidates from discussing an examination even years after its completion. The authority relies only on a remote possibility that such discussion may confuse future candidates. Which conclusion best follows?

A
The ban is valid because speculative dangers always outweigh expression.
B
The ban is valid because permanent restrictions are easier to administer.
C
The ban is invalid only if former candidates discuss the examination anonymously.
D
The ban is likely disproportionate because it severely burdens speech in response to a remote risk.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. The ban is likely disproportionate because it severely burdens speech in response to a remote risk.

Option D follows from the broad duration, severe burden, and speculative danger. A gives remote risks excessive weight, B relies on administrative convenience, and C adds an anonymity condition absent from the test.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 1. Structure reviewed against the official CLAT UG 2025 question paper and CLAT UG 2026 syllabus.

Passage or principleOriginal legal principle and fact scenarios

An offer is a clear expression of willingness to contract on stated terms, intended to become binding when accepted. A statement that merely invites others to make offers is not itself an offer. Whether a statement is an offer depends on its language and context, not its label. Acceptance must correspond with the offer and must be communicated through an authorised or reasonable method. A reply that changes a material term is a counter-offer, which rejects the original offer. A mere request for information does not reject it. An offeror may revoke an offer before acceptance, but revocation becomes effective only when it is communicated to the offeree. Reliable information from a third person that the offered property has already been sold may also communicate revocation. A posted acceptance is effective when dispatched only if the offer authorises or reasonably contemplates acceptance by post. In other cases, acceptance is effective when received. Apply only these principles. Assume that all parties have contractual capacity and that no special statute applies.

Question 11MediumOffer, Acceptance, and Revocation

A shop displays a laptop with a price label and a notice stating, "Customers may submit purchase requests at the counter, subject to stock confirmation." What is the display?

A
A completed contract with every viewer
B
An invitation for customers to make offers
C
An acceptance of the first customer's request
D
A revocation of all earlier sales

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. An invitation for customers to make offers

B is correct because the notice invites purchase requests and reserves stock confirmation. A and C treat the display as binding, while D is unrelated.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 2, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 12MediumOffer, Acceptance, and Revocation

A offers to sell a bicycle to B for Rs. 8,000. B replies, "I accept for Rs. 7,500." What is the legal effect?

A
B has accepted the original offer.
B
B has merely requested information.
C
B has made a counter-offer and rejected the original offer.
D
A must sell at the average of both prices.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. B has made a counter-offer and rejected the original offer.

C is correct because B changed a material price term. A ignores the change, B mischaracterises it, and D has no basis in the principles.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 2, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 13HardOffer, Acceptance, and Revocation

A offers to sell a painting for Rs. 20,000. B asks, "Would you accept payment in two instalments?" B does not state that she will buy only on that basis. What follows?

A
The question is a request for information and does not itself reject the offer.
B
The question is necessarily an acceptance.
C
The question automatically creates a new contract.
D
The original offer is revoked by law.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. The question is a request for information and does not itself reject the offer.

A is correct because B asks about payment without imposing a changed term. B and C wrongly create acceptance, while D confuses inquiry with revocation.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 2, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 14HardOffer, Acceptance, and Revocation

A offers to sell land to B. Before B accepts, B receives reliable information from the buyer that A has sold the land to that buyer. B then attempts to accept. Is a contract formed?

A
Yes, because only A can communicate revocation personally.
B
Yes, because sale to another person strengthens the offer.
C
No, but only because land can never be sold by contract.
D
No, because reliable information of the completed sale communicated revocation before acceptance.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. No, because reliable information of the completed sale communicated revocation before acceptance.

D applies the third-party communication rule. A contradicts it, B is illogical, and C states a false absolute rule.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 2, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 15MediumOffer, Acceptance, and Revocation

A sends B an offer that reasonably contemplates acceptance by post. B posts an unconditional acceptance before A's revocation reaches her. What follows?

A
Acceptance was effective on posting, before the revocation was communicated.
B
Acceptance is effective only when A reads the letter.
C
The revocation was effective when A privately decided to send it.
D
No contract can be formed through post.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Acceptance was effective on posting, before the revocation was communicated.

A is correct under the stated postal rule. B and D contradict that rule, while C ignores the need to communicate revocation.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 2, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Passage or principleOriginal legal principle and fact scenarios

A person may interfere with another's property when it is reasonably necessary to prevent an imminent and substantially greater harm to the person, another individual, or property. The danger need not prove real in hindsight, but the belief in it must have been reasonable on the information then available. Necessity is unavailable when a safe and practical alternative would have prevented the harm without interfering with another's property. The interference must also be proportionate. Breaking a small lock to escape a spreading fire may be justified; destroying a building to avoid a minor inconvenience is not. Private necessity creates a limited privilege. It prevents the property owner from treating the necessary entry or use as wrongful, but the person acting out of necessity must generally pay for actual physical damage caused to the property. No payment is due merely for harmless entry. A person who deliberately created the emergency cannot rely on necessity. Apply only these principles and distinguish justification for entry from responsibility for resulting damage.

Question 16MediumPrivate Necessity and Property Damage

During a sudden flood, Kavya enters an unlocked private shed on high ground to avoid being swept away. She causes no damage. Is the entry wrongful?

A
Yes, because entry onto another's property is always wrongful.
B
Yes, unless the owner had given written permission earlier.
C
No, because the entry was reasonably necessary to prevent imminent serious harm and caused no damage.
D
No, but Kavya must pay the full value of the shed.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. No, because the entry was reasonably necessary to prevent imminent serious harm and caused no damage.

C is correct because the entry was necessary, proportionate, and harmless. A and B ignore necessity, while D invents payment without damage.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 2, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 17HardPrivate Necessity and Property Damage

Arun sees smoke and hears an alarm from a neighbour's locked house. He reasonably believes a child is inside and breaks the door, but the house is empty. Can necessity apply?

A
Yes, because the belief was reasonable on the information then available.
B
No, because the danger must always be real in hindsight.
C
No, because necessity protects only property and never people.
D
Yes, and Arun can never be liable for physical damage.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Yes, because the belief was reasonable on the information then available.

A is correct because a reasonable belief is enough even if mistaken. B and C contradict the principle. D ignores possible responsibility for actual damage.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 2, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 18MediumPrivate Necessity and Property Damage

Meera cuts through a neighbour's fence to reach a road, although an open public gate two metres away provides an equally safe route. Can she rely on necessity?

A
Yes, because the fence route was shorter.
B
Yes, because no alternative matters once danger is alleged.
C
No, but only if the neighbour witnessed the act.
D
No, because a safe and practical non-interfering alternative was available.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. No, because a safe and practical non-interfering alternative was available.

D is correct under the alternatives rule. Convenience does not establish necessity, and the owner's presence is irrelevant.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 2, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 19MediumPrivate Necessity and Property Damage

To escape an advancing wildfire, Dev reasonably drives across private land and damages a gate. Which result best follows?

A
The entry is wrongful and Dev must be imprisoned.
B
The entry may be privileged, but Dev must generally pay for the actual gate damage.
C
The owner must pay Dev for choosing the route.
D
Dev owes the full value of the land.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The entry may be privileged, but Dev must generally pay for the actual gate damage.

B distinguishes justified use from responsibility for physical damage. A, C, and D add consequences unsupported by the passage.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 2, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 20HardPrivate Necessity and Property Damage

Riya deliberately starts a small fire to frighten others, loses control of it, and breaks a neighbour's window to escape. Can she rely on necessity?

A
Yes, because every fire automatically creates necessity.
B
Yes, if the window was inexpensive.
C
No, because she deliberately created the emergency.
D
No, because necessity never applies to escape.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. No, because she deliberately created the emergency.

C directly applies the self-created emergency rule. A and B ignore fault, while D is an unsupported absolute claim.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 2, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Passage or principleOriginal legal principle and fact scenarios

Defamation occurs when a person publishes to someone other than the claimant a false statement of fact that would lower the claimant's reputation in the eyes of a reasonable person. Mere insult that communicates no factual allegation is not defamation. A statement of opinion may be treated as fact when it implies undisclosed facts that justify the opinion. Truth is a complete defence. Fair comment protects an honestly held opinion on a matter of public interest when the facts on which it is based are true or clearly indicated. A publisher who accurately reports an allegation as an allegation does not prove that the allegation itself is true. The claimant must be identifiable, even if not named. Publication requires communication to at least one third person. Apply only these principles.

Question 21MediumDefamation and Responsible Publication

A writes a false accusation in a private letter delivered only to B, whom the accusation concerns. Has A published it for defamation?

A
Yes, because every written statement is published.
B
No, because it was not communicated to a third person.
C
Yes, because B read it.
D
No, because letters can never be defamatory.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. No, because it was not communicated to a third person.

B is correct because publication requires communication to someone other than the claimant. A, C, and D ignore that rule.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 3, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 22MediumDefamation and Responsible Publication

A newspaper accurately states that a contractor was convicted of fraud. The statement lowers his reputation. Which result follows?

A
The newspaper is liable whenever reputation falls.
B
The conviction becomes false after publication.
C
Truth provides a complete defence.
D
Public records can never be reported.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Truth provides a complete defence.

C is correct because the statement is true. Reputational harm alone does not defeat the truth defence.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 3, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 23HardDefamation and Responsible Publication

A reviewer writes, "The chef is dishonest," implying knowledge of hidden theft but giving no facts. The implication is false. Can the label be treated as fact?

A
Yes, because the opinion implies undisclosed facts supporting it.
B
No, because words introduced as opinion are never actionable.
C
No, because restaurants have no reputation.
D
Yes, but only if the chef agrees.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Yes, because the opinion implies undisclosed facts supporting it.

A applies the rule on opinions implying undisclosed facts. B is too absolute, while C and D have no basis.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 3, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Topics in this subject

A grocery store notices water spreading across a busy entrance. A warning cone is available beside the door, but the manager decides to place it later. Mira slips before it is placed and fractures her wrist. Which conclusion best follows?

A bus operator negligently delays replacing a worn seat cover. During the journey, lightning strikes the bus and injures Dev while he is sitting on that seat. The injury would have been identical with a new cover. Is the operator liable for Dev's injury under the passage?

Rohan leaves a deep pit unguarded beside a public path. A cyclist swerves after a dog barks, falls into the pit, and is injured. Which option is most accurate?

A theatre negligently blocks a marked exit with boxes. When smoke enters the hall, Leena climbs over the boxes to escape and injures her ankle. Her response is reasonable in the emergency. Can the theatre reduce liability by blaming her for climbing?

Two factories independently release chemicals into a stream on the same day. Evidence shows that each release materially contributed to the destruction of a fish farm downstream. Which conclusion best follows?

During a two-hour entrance examination, the authority temporarily blocks candidates from posting live photographs of the question paper. The block ends when the examination ends. Which conclusion is most defensible?

A city prohibits a peaceful poster solely because it criticises the mayor. Officials later claim that the ban protected traffic, although the original decision and surrounding facts contain no reference to traffic. Is that later claim sufficient?

To protect patient privacy, a hospital run by the State bans visitors from photographing medical files displayed at a records desk. Which element is most clearly satisfied?

A university bans every student publication for six months to prevent one leaked answer key from circulating. Secure access controls could stop circulation of the key just as effectively. Which part of the test is most directly violated?

A permanent ban prevents all former candidates from discussing an examination even years after its completion. The authority relies only on a remote possibility that such discussion may confuse future candidates. Which conclusion best follows?

A shop displays a laptop with a price label and a notice stating, "Customers may submit purchase requests at the counter, subject to stock confirmation." What is the display?

A offers to sell a bicycle to B for Rs. 8,000. B replies, "I accept for Rs. 7,500." What is the legal effect?

A offers to sell a painting for Rs. 20,000. B asks, "Would you accept payment in two instalments?" B does not state that she will buy only on that basis. What follows?

A offers to sell land to B. Before B accepts, B receives reliable information from the buyer that A has sold the land to that buyer. B then attempts to accept. Is a contract formed?

A sends B an offer that reasonably contemplates acceptance by post. B posts an unconditional acceptance before A's revocation reaches her. What follows?

During a sudden flood, Kavya enters an unlocked private shed on high ground to avoid being swept away. She causes no damage. Is the entry wrongful?

Arun sees smoke and hears an alarm from a neighbour's locked house. He reasonably believes a child is inside and breaks the door, but the house is empty. Can necessity apply?

Meera cuts through a neighbour's fence to reach a road, although an open public gate two metres away provides an equally safe route. Can she rely on necessity?

To escape an advancing wildfire, Dev reasonably drives across private land and damages a gate. Which result best follows?

Riya deliberately starts a small fire to frighten others, loses control of it, and breaks a neighbour's window to escape. Can she rely on necessity?

A writes a false accusation in a private letter delivered only to B, whom the accusation concerns. Has A published it for defamation?

A newspaper accurately states that a contractor was convicted of fraud. The statement lowers his reputation. Which result follows?

A reviewer writes, "The chef is dishonest," implying knowledge of hidden theft but giving no facts. The implication is false. Can the label be treated as fact?

Related CLAT UG subjects