International Law MCQs for Judiciary, Page 5

Judiciary International Law questions 95-117 of 235, with answer keys and explanations covering sources, treaties, State responsibility, recognition, jurisdiction, law of the sea, the United Nations, use of force, and human rights.

235 questions37 topics95-117 on this page

Topics in this subject

Practice judiciary exam MCQs with answers and explanations across substantive law, procedure, evidence, constitutional law, and state judicial service subjects.

  • Air and Space Law4
  • Asylum and Extradition1
  • Diplomatic and Consular Law1
  • Diplomatic Protection2
  • Dispute Settlement3
  • Environmental Law2
  • Extradition and Asylum4
  • Human Rights9
  • Human Rights and Refugee Law3
  • Immunities12
  • International Court of Justice10
  • International Criminal Law14
  • International Economic Law5
  • International Environmental Law5
  • International Humanitarian Law9
  • International Investment Law3
  • International Law and Municipal Law2
  • International Organisations4
  • International Watercourses1
  • Jurisdiction14
  • Law of the Sea22
  • Nationality4
  • Recent Developments5
  • Recognition1
  • Recognition and Non-Recognition1
  • Refugee Law2
  • Self-Determination1
  • Sources of International Law14
  • State Recognition2
  • State Responsibility15
  • State Succession5
  • Statehood and Recognition8
  • Subjects of International Law1
  • Treatment of Aliens1
  • Treaty Law24
  • United Nations10
  • Use of Force11
Question 95HardInternational Humanitarian Law

Combatant status is significant because lawful combatants generally have:

  1. A

    No legal obligations in war.

  2. B

    Immunity for genocide.

  3. C

    Combatant privilege and prisoner-of-war protection upon capture.

  4. D

    A right to target civilians.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Combatant privilege and prisoner-of-war protection upon capture.

Combatant status carries both privileges and obligations. It does not authorise violations of IHL.

Source note: Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol I

Question 96HardInternational Criminal Law

The special mental element of genocide is the intent to destroy, in whole or in part:

  1. A

    Any political party as such under the Genocide Convention.

  2. B

    Any private corporation.

  3. C

    Any military objective.

  4. D

    A protected national, ethnical, racial, or religious group as such.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. A protected national, ethnical, racial, or religious group as such.

Genocide requires dolus specialis directed at a protected group. The Convention does not list political groups as protected groups.

Source note: Genocide Convention 1948

Question 97MediumInternational Criminal Law

Crimes against humanity require a widespread or systematic attack directed against:

  1. A

    A civilian population.

  2. B

    Only a military base.

  3. C

    Only embassy property.

  4. D

    Only a treaty depositary.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. A civilian population.

Crimes against humanity are not defined by isolated wrongdoing alone. They require the contextual element of a widespread or systematic attack on a civilian population.

Source note: Rome Statute Article 7

Question 98MediumInternational Criminal Law

War crimes require a nexus with:

  1. A

    Only a trade dispute.

  2. B

    An armed conflict.

  3. C

    Only diplomatic recognition.

  4. D

    Only state succession.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. An armed conflict.

War crimes are serious violations of IHL linked to an armed conflict. The armed-conflict nexus distinguishes them from ordinary domestic crimes.

Source note: Rome Statute Article 8

Question 99HardInternational Criminal Law

Command or superior responsibility may arise where a superior knew or should have known of crimes and:

  1. A

    Held a ceremonial title with no control.

  2. B

    Belonged to a different nationality.

  3. C

    Failed to take necessary and reasonable measures to prevent or punish them.

  4. D

    Signed an unrelated treaty.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Failed to take necessary and reasonable measures to prevent or punish them.

Superior responsibility links authority, knowledge, and failure to act. It is not strict liability based only on rank.

Source note: Rome Statute Article 28

Question 100MediumInternational Criminal Law

The ICC principle of complementarity means the Court acts when national systems are:

  1. A

    Always functioning perfectly.

  2. B

    The only courts with jurisdiction.

  3. C

    Responsible for maritime delimitation.

  4. D

    Unwilling or unable genuinely to investigate or prosecute.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Unwilling or unable genuinely to investigate or prosecute.

The ICC is not intended to replace national courts in every case. Complementarity makes it a court of last resort where genuine domestic action is absent.

Source note: Rome Statute Article 17

Question 101EasyInternational Criminal Law

A central development of modern international criminal law is that:

  1. A

    Individuals may incur criminal responsibility directly under international law.

  2. B

    Only states can be criminally punished.

  3. C

    International crimes are only civil wrongs.

  4. D

    Official rank always bars prosecution forever.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Individuals may incur criminal responsibility directly under international law.

From Nuremberg onward, international law has recognised direct individual criminal responsibility for serious international crimes.

Source note: Nuremberg principles; Rome Statute

Question 102HardInternational Criminal Law

Under the Rome Statute, official capacity as a head of state or government:

  1. A

    Automatically eliminates all criminal responsibility.

  2. B

    Does not exempt a person from criminal responsibility under the Statute.

  3. C

    Applies only to commercial arbitration.

  4. D

    Creates immunity for private companies.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Does not exempt a person from criminal responsibility under the Statute.

Article 27 Rome Statute rejects official-capacity immunity before the ICC. Questions of arrest and cooperation can still raise separate legal and practical issues.

Source note: Rome Statute Article 27

Question 103MediumInternational Economic Law

The mfn principle in WTO law broadly requires a member to:

  1. A

    Trade only with neighbouring states.

  2. B

    Give preference only to former colonies.

  3. C

    Extend an advantage granted to one member to like products or services of other members, subject to exceptions.

  4. D

    Abolish all tariffs immediately.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Extend an advantage granted to one member to like products or services of other members, subject to exceptions.

MFN is a non-discrimination principle. Its exact application depends on the relevant WTO agreement and recognised exceptions.

Source note: GATT Article I; GATS Article II

Question 104MediumInternational Economic Law

National treatment in trade law generally addresses discrimination against:

  1. A

    Domestic products only.

  2. B

    Diplomats at airports.

  3. C

    Refugees seeking asylum.

  4. D

    Imported products after they have entered the domestic market.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Imported products after they have entered the domestic market.

National treatment requires imported and domestic like products to be treated without protective discrimination after importation, subject to the agreement's precise terms.

Source note: GATT Article III

Question 105EasyInternational Economic Law

WTO dispute settlement is primarily state-to-state because:

  1. A

    Members bring claims against other members under WTO agreements.

  2. B

    Private consumers file criminal appeals directly.

  3. C

    The ICJ hears every WTO case automatically.

  4. D

    Only corporations vote in the Dispute Settlement Body.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Members bring claims against other members under WTO agreements.

WTO dispute settlement is structured around members. Private actors may influence disputes domestically, but they are not direct parties before panels.

Source note: WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding

Question 106HardInternational Investment Law

Fair and equitable treatment in investment law is commonly associated with:

  1. A

    A guarantee of profit in every investment.

  2. B

    Protection against arbitrariness, denial of justice, and serious unfairness by the host state.

  3. C

    Complete immunity from domestic regulation.

  4. D

    A right to avoid all taxation.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Protection against arbitrariness, denial of justice, and serious unfairness by the host state.

FET standards vary by treaty, but they commonly address fairness, due process, legitimate expectations, and arbitrary state conduct. They do not insure commercial success.

Source note: Investment treaty arbitration doctrine

Question 107HardInternational Investment Law

Indirect expropriation concerns state measures that:

  1. A

    Merely regulate without serious economic impact in every case.

  2. B

    Only involve physical seizure of land.

  3. C

    Substantially deprive the investor of the use or value of the investment without formal transfer of title.

  4. D

    Only apply to diplomatic premises.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Substantially deprive the investor of the use or value of the investment without formal transfer of title.

Indirect expropriation focuses on effect rather than formal title. The line between compensable expropriation and legitimate regulation is often contested.

Source note: Investment treaty arbitration doctrine

Question 108HardInternational Investment Law

A fork-in-the-road clause in an investment treaty generally requires the investor to:

  1. A

    Litigate in every forum simultaneously.

  2. B

    Avoid all domestic remedies forever.

  3. C

    Submit disputes only to the Security Council.

  4. D

    Choose between available dispute forums, with consequences once a choice is made.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Choose between available dispute forums, with consequences once a choice is made.

Fork-in-the-road clauses try to prevent duplicative litigation by making the investor's forum choice legally significant.

Source note: Investment treaty dispute settlement doctrine

Question 109MediumInternational Economic Law

The TRIPS Agreement is significant because it:

  1. A

    Sets minimum standards for protection and enforcement of intellectual property within the WTO system.

  2. B

    Abolishes all patents worldwide.

  3. C

    Deals only with extradition.

  4. D

    Creates diplomatic immunity for inventors.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Sets minimum standards for protection and enforcement of intellectual property within the WTO system.

TRIPS integrates intellectual property standards into the WTO framework and links them with dispute settlement.

Source note: TRIPS Agreement

Question 110HardInternational Economic Law

General exceptions under GATT Article XX require the measure to fall within a listed ground and also satisfy:

  1. A

    Only a domestic press release.

  2. B

    The chapeau, which guards against arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination and disguised restriction.

  3. C

    A requirement of military occupation.

  4. D

    Automatic approval by private exporters.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The chapeau, which guards against arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination and disguised restriction.

Article XX analysis has two stages: the measure must fit a paragraph and must satisfy the chapeau's anti-abuse discipline.

Source note: GATT Article XX; WTO jurisprudence

Question 111HardSources of International Law

A state persistently and openly objects to an emerging customary rule from the beginning of its formation. In principle, the effect of this conduct is that the state may:

  1. A

    Still be bound once a few major powers support the rule

  2. B

    Avoid the rule as against itself, provided the rule is not jus cogens

  3. C

    Escape any treaty obligation as well

  4. D

    Bind other states by unilateral declaration

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Avoid the rule as against itself, provided the rule is not jus cogens

The persistent objector doctrine is a narrow exception to custom. A state that objects consistently from the outset may avoid the rule as against itself, but it cannot opt out of peremptory norms.

Source note: Customary international law doctrine

Question 112MediumRecognition

Which of the following is not one of the classic Montevideo indicators of statehood?

  1. A

    A permanent population

  2. B

    A defined territory

  3. C

    A democratic constitution

  4. D

    Capacity to enter into relations with other states

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. A democratic constitution

The Montevideo formulation speaks of population, territory, government, and capacity for international relations. It does not require any particular constitutional ideology such as democracy.

Source note: Montevideo Convention doctrine

Question 113HardState Succession

When a new state emerges from decolonisation, the clean slate approach is most commonly associated with which proposition?

  1. A

    All predecessor treaties automatically continue without exception

  2. B

    The new state is not automatically bound by every predecessor treaty simply by reason of succession

  3. C

    The predecessor state loses all treaty rights everywhere

  4. D

    Customary rules stop applying to the new state

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The new state is not automatically bound by every predecessor treaty simply by reason of succession

The clean slate idea is most often linked with newly independent states. It means they are not automatically tied to all predecessor treaties merely because the territory changed hands.

Source note: State succession doctrine

Question 114MediumNationality

The Nottebohm principle is commonly cited for the idea that nationality, in some international contexts, should reflect:

  1. A

    A purely symbolic paper connection

  2. B

    A genuine and effective link

  3. C

    Residence for at least one week

  4. D

    Only military service

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. A genuine and effective link

The Nottebohm case is often associated with effective nationality. It emphasised the need for a real connection in certain international claims settings.

Source note: Nottebohm principle

Question 115MediumExtradition and Asylum

The rule of double criminality in extradition broadly requires that:

  1. A

    The exact wording of the offence must be identical in both states

  2. B

    The conduct underlying the request should be criminal in both legal systems

  3. C

    Only the requesting state must criminalise the conduct

  4. D

    Only political offences qualify

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The conduct underlying the request should be criminal in both legal systems

Double criminality looks to the substance of the conduct, not necessarily to identical statutory labels. The act must generally amount to an offence in both jurisdictions.

Source note: Extradition doctrine

Question 116EasyJurisdiction

Universal jurisdiction is most classically invoked in relation to offences such as:

  1. A

    Parking violations abroad

  2. B

    Piracy on the high seas

  3. C

    Ordinary breach of contract

  4. D

    Election disputes in another state

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Piracy on the high seas

Piracy is the traditional and clearest example of universal jurisdiction. The offender may be prosecuted by any state because the crime is treated as one of concern to all.

Source note: Classical universal jurisdiction doctrine

Question 117MediumImmunities

Immunity ratione personae primarily protects:

  1. A

    Only private commercial acts of former officials

  2. B

    Certain incumbent high-ranking state officials from foreign jurisdiction while they remain in office

  3. C

    All retired officials forever

  4. D

    Every public employee regardless of rank

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Certain incumbent high-ranking state officials from foreign jurisdiction while they remain in office

This immunity is status based and temporary. It attaches to certain incumbent officeholders such as heads of state, heads of government, and foreign ministers while they are in office.

Source note: Immunity doctrine