International Law MCQs for Judiciary, Page 8

Judiciary International Law questions 165-188 of 235, with answer keys and explanations covering sources, treaties, State responsibility, recognition, jurisdiction, law of the sea, the United Nations, use of force, and human rights.

235 questions37 topics165-188 on this page

Topics in this subject

Practice judiciary exam MCQs with answers and explanations across substantive law, procedure, evidence, constitutional law, and state judicial service subjects.

  • Air and Space Law4
  • Asylum and Extradition1
  • Diplomatic and Consular Law1
  • Diplomatic Protection2
  • Dispute Settlement3
  • Environmental Law2
  • Extradition and Asylum4
  • Human Rights9
  • Human Rights and Refugee Law3
  • Immunities12
  • International Court of Justice10
  • International Criminal Law14
  • International Economic Law5
  • International Environmental Law5
  • International Humanitarian Law9
  • International Investment Law3
  • International Law and Municipal Law2
  • International Organisations4
  • International Watercourses1
  • Jurisdiction14
  • Law of the Sea22
  • Nationality4
  • Recent Developments5
  • Recognition1
  • Recognition and Non-Recognition1
  • Refugee Law2
  • Self-Determination1
  • Sources of International Law14
  • State Recognition2
  • State Responsibility15
  • State Succession5
  • Statehood and Recognition8
  • Subjects of International Law1
  • Treatment of Aliens1
  • Treaty Law24
  • United Nations10
  • Use of Force11
Question 165MediumTreaty Law

A material breach matters because it may in some circumstances justify:

  1. A

    Suspension or termination by the injured party under treaty law rules

  2. B

    Automatic criminal punishment of all nationals

  3. C

    Immediate annexation

  4. D

    The extinction of customary law

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Suspension or termination by the injured party under treaty law rules

Material breach is treated seriously because it can undermine the basis of reciprocal consent. But the legal consequences still depend on the structure of the treaty and the rules governing response.

Source note: Vienna Convention treaty termination doctrine

Question 166HardState Responsibility

An act performed by a state organ in excess of authority may still be attributable to the state if the organ:

  1. A

    Acted in an official capacity or used its governmental position

  2. B

    Was secretly dismissed the next day

  3. C

    Acted after retirement only

  4. D

    Held no public status whatsoever

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Acted in an official capacity or used its governmental position

Attribution does not disappear merely because an organ exceeded instructions. International law looks at whether the person acted in an official character or used state authority, not only at internal legality.

Source note: ARSIWA attribution doctrine

Question 167HardState Responsibility

Conduct of private persons may be attributed to a state where those persons acted under the state's:

  1. A

    Direction or control in the legally relevant sense

  2. B

    Moral approval alone

  3. C

    Cultural influence only

  4. D

    Historical similarity

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Direction or control in the legally relevant sense

The law does not attribute private conduct to a state casually. It requires a sufficiently close connection, commonly framed in terms of direction or control, and the precise threshold depends on the legal test being applied.

Source note: ARSIWA; case law on attribution

Question 168MediumState Responsibility

Necessity as a circumstance precluding wrongfulness is exceptional because it cannot be invoked merely to:

  1. A

    Protect an essential interest from grave peril

  2. B

    Escape ordinary inconvenience or policy difficulty

  3. C

    Respond to a truly exceptional emergency

  4. D

    Temporarily justify non-performance in narrow cases

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Escape ordinary inconvenience or policy difficulty

Necessity is tightly confined. It is not a general licence to disregard obligations whenever compliance becomes costly or politically difficult; it applies only in truly exceptional circumstances.

Source note: ARSIWA necessity doctrine

Question 169MediumState Responsibility

A lawful countermeasure is best understood as a response that is:

  1. A

    Punitive and unlimited

  2. B

    Temporary, proportionate, and directed toward inducing compliance

  3. C

    Secret and permanent

  4. D

    Available against humanitarian obligations without limit

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Temporary, proportionate, and directed toward inducing compliance

Countermeasures are structured instruments of compliance, not revenge. Their legality depends on conditions such as prior wrongfulness by the target state, proportionality, and limits protecting certain obligations.

Source note: ARSIWA countermeasures doctrine

Question 170EasyState Responsibility

Obligations erga omnes are important because they are owed:

  1. A

    Only to neighbouring states

  2. B

    To the international community as a whole

  3. C

    Only to treaty depositaries

  4. D

    Only to private corporations

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. To the international community as a whole

The concept marks obligations of common legal concern, such as those connected to fundamental values. Their breach is not treated as a merely private matter between two states.

Source note: Barcelona Traction principle

Question 171EasyHuman Rights and Refugee Law

The principle of non-refoulement primarily restrains a state from:

  1. A

    Sending a person to a place where they face persecution or other serious prohibited harm

  2. B

    Questioning a passport applicant

  3. C

    Operating refugee camps

  4. D

    Imposing any border control

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Sending a person to a place where they face persecution or other serious prohibited harm

Non-refoulement is a core protective principle in both refugee law and broader human rights law. Its function is preventive: it aims to stop return to danger before the harm occurs.

Source note: Refugee and human rights law

Question 172MediumHuman Rights and Refugee Law

A derogation clause in a human rights treaty does not mean that a state may:

  1. A

    Adjust some obligations in a genuine emergency within treaty limits

  2. B

    Suspend every right without legal constraint

  3. C

    Take emergency measures subject to treaty conditions

  4. D

    Rely on formal derogation where permitted

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Suspend every right without legal constraint

Derogation clauses are exceptional and controlled. They do not erase the distinction between derogable and non-derogable rights, nor do they give a blank cheque to the state.

Source note: Human rights treaty doctrine

Question 173MediumHuman Rights and Refugee Law

International concern with statelessness is rooted in the idea that lack of nationality often means lack of:

  1. A

    Sporting preference

  2. B

    A stable legal bond with any state and access to many practical protections

  3. C

    Private property always

  4. D

    Any residence in fact

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. A stable legal bond with any state and access to many practical protections

Nationality is not only symbolic. It often determines documentation, mobility, diplomatic protection, and access to public systems, which is why statelessness creates severe legal vulnerability.

Source note: Nationality and statelessness doctrine

Question 174EasyLaw of the Sea

Passage through the territorial sea is innocent so long as it is not:

  1. A

    Continuous and expeditious

  2. B

    Prejudicial to the peace, good order, or security of the coastal state

  3. C

    Undertaken by a merchant vessel

  4. D

    Taken during daylight

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Prejudicial to the peace, good order, or security of the coastal state

The concept of innocent passage balances navigation and coastal security. The focus is on the nature of the conduct during passage, not on the vessel's flag alone.

Source note: UNCLOS innocent passage regime

Question 175MediumLaw of the Sea

The contiguous zone is best understood as a maritime area beyond the territorial sea where the coastal state may exercise limited control related to:

  1. A

    Only military annexation

  2. B

    Customs, fiscal, immigration, and sanitary laws

  3. C

    Unlimited resource ownership

  4. D

    Complete sovereignty equal to land territory

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Customs, fiscal, immigration, and sanitary laws

The contiguous zone does not confer full sovereignty. It allows targeted enforcement-type control for specific regulatory interests listed in the law of the sea framework.

Source note: UNCLOS maritime zones

Question 176MediumLaw of the Sea

In the exclusive economic zone, the coastal state principally enjoys sovereign rights for:

  1. A

    The exploration and exploitation of natural resources

  2. B

    Absolute control over all navigation

  3. C

    Expelling every foreign vessel

  4. D

    A total ban on scientific activity by all others

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. The exploration and exploitation of natural resources

The EEZ is a resource-oriented zone, not full territorial sovereignty. Other states still retain important freedoms, including navigation, subject to the coastal state's lawful rights.

Source note: UNCLOS EEZ regime

Question 177HardLaw of the Sea

The continental shelf rights of a coastal state are often described as ipso facto and ab initio because they:

  1. A

    Depend on constant annual renewal by the UN

  2. B

    Exist by operation of law and do not depend on occupation or proclamation in the same way as territorial claims

  3. C

    Require military occupation of the seabed

  4. D

    Exist only where fisheries are abundant

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Exist by operation of law and do not depend on occupation or proclamation in the same way as territorial claims

The shelf doctrine treats these rights as inherent and legally attached to the coastal state. That does not mean there are no delimitation questions, but the basic entitlement does not arise from conquest or occupation.

Source note: Continental shelf doctrine

Question 178EasyLaw of the Sea

A classic freedom of the high seas is the freedom of:

  1. A

    Navigation

  2. B

    Annexation of any passing vessel

  3. C

    Ignoring all anti-piracy rules

  4. D

    Exclusive fishing by the first state to arrive

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Navigation

The high seas are governed by freedom, not territorial sovereignty. Navigation is the most classic of these freedoms, though it remains subject to important international constraints.

Source note: Law of the sea doctrine

Question 179MediumInternational Environmental Law

The no-harm principle is commonly associated with the idea that a state should not allow activities within its jurisdiction to cause significant transboundary:

  1. A

    Environmental harm to another state

  2. B

    Cultural preference shifts

  3. C

    Electoral change abroad

  4. D

    Private inconvenience alone

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Environmental harm to another state

This principle links sovereignty with responsibility. A state is not free to use its territory in ways that cause serious cross-border environmental injury without regard to the rights of others.

Source note: Trail Smelter style principle; environmental law

Question 180MediumInternational Environmental Law

Due diligence in environmental law usually requires a state to:

  1. A

    Guarantee that no accident can ever happen

  2. B

    Take reasonable preventive, regulatory, and monitoring steps in the circumstances

  3. C

    Abandon all industrial activity

  4. D

    Seek Security Council approval for local licensing

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Take reasonable preventive, regulatory, and monitoring steps in the circumstances

Due diligence is about reasonableness and prevention, not absolute perfection. The standard asks whether the state took serious and appropriate steps to control risk in light of the situation.

Source note: Environmental due diligence doctrine

Question 181HardInternational Watercourses

The principle of equitable and reasonable utilisation seeks to balance:

  1. A

    Only the wishes of the downstream state

  2. B

    Competing uses and interests of watercourse states in a fair and context-sensitive way

  3. C

    Exclusive control of the first user forever

  4. D

    Military command over river banks

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Competing uses and interests of watercourse states in a fair and context-sensitive way

Shared watercourses demand balance rather than absolute control by one state. The principle asks what allocation and use are fair in light of geography, dependency, existing use, and other relevant factors.

Source note: International watercourses doctrine

Question 182MediumUnited Nations

Traditional UN peacekeeping is usually associated with which combination?

  1. A

    Consent, impartiality, and limited use of force except in self-defence and mandate defence

  2. B

    Automatic declaration of war

  3. C

    Annexation of disputed territory

  4. D

    Permanent criminal jurisdiction over civilians

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Consent, impartiality, and limited use of force except in self-defence and mandate defence

Classic peacekeeping developed as a practical model distinct from both ordinary diplomacy and collective military enforcement. Its legitimacy has often rested on consent, impartiality, and restrained force.

Source note: UN peacekeeping practice

Question 183MediumUnited Nations

One major criticism of targeted sanctions regimes has been concern about:

  1. A

    Lack of due process safeguards for listed individuals and entities

  2. B

    Too much private voting in the ICJ

  3. C

    Excessive environmental inspections only

  4. D

    Absence of maritime zones

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Lack of due process safeguards for listed individuals and entities

Modern sanctions practice raised serious fairness questions, especially where individuals were listed with limited notice or review. This led to greater attention to procedural safeguards and review mechanisms.

Source note: UN sanctions practice

Question 184HardInternational Court of Justice

Jurisdiction and admissibility are distinct because a case may:

  1. A

    Always satisfy both if filed by a state

  2. B

    Fall within the Court's jurisdiction yet still face a separate admissibility objection

  3. C

    Be admissible without any applicant

  4. D

    Avoid all procedural scrutiny in advisory proceedings

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Fall within the Court's jurisdiction yet still face a separate admissibility objection

Jurisdiction asks whether the Court has authority to hear the dispute. Admissibility addresses whether, even assuming jurisdiction, the specific claim is fit to be heard at that time and in that form.

Source note: ICJ procedure

Question 185HardInternational Court of Justice

A state seeking to intervene before the ICJ usually argues that it has:

  1. A

    A legal interest that may be affected by the decision

  2. B

    A cultural connection to one party

  3. C

    A trade surplus in the region

  4. D

    The support of the UN Secretariat only

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. A legal interest that may be affected by the decision

Intervention is not a free political participation device. The intervening state must show a legal interest of sufficient relevance to the case before the Court.

Source note: ICJ Statute and Rules

Question 186MediumInternational Humanitarian Law

A non-international armed conflict generally requires organisation of the parties and a certain level of:

  1. A

    Commercial exchange

  2. B

    Intensity of violence

  3. C

    Judicial training

  4. D

    UN membership

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Intensity of violence

Not every internal disturbance is a non-international armed conflict in law. The threshold typically turns on organised parties and violence that is intense enough to move beyond riots or sporadic unrest.

Source note: IHL classification doctrine

Question 187HardInternational Humanitarian Law

A major distinction between international and non-international armed conflict is that formal combatant privilege is classically recognised in:

  1. A

    International armed conflict, not in the same way in non-international armed conflict

  2. B

    Only peacetime disputes

  3. C

    Environmental law alone

  4. D

    Consular law alone

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. International armed conflict, not in the same way in non-international armed conflict

The law of international armed conflict recognises a status framework for lawful combatancy. Non-international armed conflict does not mirror that structure in the same full way, which has major consequences for detention and prosecution.

Source note: IHL status doctrine

Question 188MediumInternational Criminal Law

Command responsibility is concerned with liability of superiors who:

  1. A

    Personally commit every physical act of the offence

  2. B

    Fail to prevent or punish crimes in circumstances where international law imposes such responsibility

  3. C

    Write textbooks on war

  4. D

    Hold only symbolic office without any authority

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Fail to prevent or punish crimes in circumstances where international law imposes such responsibility

Command responsibility does not require that the superior be the direct hand behind every act. It addresses culpable failure to control subordinates where the legal conditions of knowledge and authority are satisfied.

Source note: International criminal law doctrine