Labour Law MCQs for Judiciary, Page 3

Judiciary Labour Law questions 51-75 of 150, with answer keys and explanations covering industrial disputes, trade unions, standing orders, wages, social security, occupational safety, and labour codes.

150 questions150 topics51-75 on this page

Topics in this subject

Practice judiciary exam MCQs with answers and explanations across substantive law, procedure, evidence, constitutional law, and state judicial service subjects.

  • Apprentices Act 1961 - Purpose and Scope1
  • Apprentices Act 1961 - Section 18 - Status of Apprentices1
  • Building and Other Construction Workers Act 1996 - Purpose and Cess1
  • Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act 1986 - Prohibition and Amendment1
  • Code on Social Security 2020 - Aggregator and Gig Worker Contribution Mechanism1
  • Code on Social Security 2020 - Consolidation of Social Security Legislation1
  • Code on Social Security 2020 - Gig and Platform Workers1
  • Code on Social Security 2020 - Maternity Benefit Provisions Retained from the 1961 Act1
  • Code on Wages 2019 - Consolidation of Wage Legislation1
  • Code on Wages 2019 - Definition of Wages - Inclusions and Exclusions1
  • Code on Wages 2019 - Gender Neutrality in Wage Provisions1
  • Code on Wages 2019 - Section 18 - Time Period for Payment of Wages1
  • Code on Wages 2019 - Section 26 - Bonus Eligibility Wage Ceiling1
  • Code on Wages 2019 - Section 30 - Maintenance of Registers, Records, and Returns1
  • Code on Wages 2019 - Section 9 - Components of Minimum Wage1
  • Code on Wages 2019 - Universal Minimum Wage Concept1
  • Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act 1970 - Section 1 - Applicability and Purpose1
  • Contract Labour Act 1970 - Steel Authority of India Case - Automatic Absorption Question1
  • Employees Compensation Act 1923 - Section 10 - Notice and Claim1
  • Employees Compensation Act 1923 - Section 3 - Employer's Liability for Compensation1
  • Employees Compensation Act 1923 - Section 4 - Calculation of Compensation Amount1
  • Employees Provident Funds Act 1952 - Schemes Under the Act1
  • Employees Provident Funds Act 1952 - Section 1 - Applicability1
  • Employees Provident Funds Act 1952 - Section 7A - Determination of Moneys Due from Employers1
  • Employees State Insurance Act 1948 - Purpose and Scope1
  • Employees State Insurance Act 1948 - Section 38 - All Employees to be Insured1
  • Equal Remuneration Act 1976 - Section 4 - Equal Pay for Equal Work1
  • Essential Services Maintenance Act 1981 - Purpose and Effect1
  • Factories Act 1948 - Chapter III - Health Provisions1
  • Factories Act 1948 - Section 2(m) - Definition of Factory1
  • Factories Act 1948 - Section 51 to 56 - Working Hours1
  • Factories Act 1948 - Section 59 - Overtime Wages1
  • Factories Act 1948 - Section 67 - Prohibition of Employment of Young Children1
  • Factories Act 1948 - Section 79 - Annual Leave with Wages1
  • Factories Act 1948 - Section 87 - Prohibition of Employment in Dangerous Operations1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - A. Sundarambal Case - Teachers as Workmen1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Air India v Nargesh Meerza Case - Discriminatory Service Conditions1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Chapter VA - Lay-off Compensation under Section 25C1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Chapter VB - Special Provisions for Large Establishments1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Concept of Industrial Adjudication versus Ordinary Civil Adjudication1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Deepali Gundu Surwase Case - Back Wages on Reinstatement1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Dharangadhra Chemical Works - Control and Supervision Test1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Essorpe Mills Case - Domestic Inquiry and Natural Justice1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Fifth Schedule - Unfair Labour Practices by Employers1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Fifth Schedule - Unfair Labour Practices by Workmen and Trade Unions1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Fire Stone Tyre & Rubber Co Case - Continuous Service1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - H.R. Adyanthaya Case - Predominant Nature of Duties Test1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Hindustan Steel Limited v Workmen - Domestic Inquiry Standards1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - J.H. Jadhav Case - Individual vs Industrial Dispute1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Management of Chandramalai Estate - Legality vs Justifiability of Strike1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Municipal Corporation of Delhi v Female Workers1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Punjab Land Development Case - Section 25F Compliance1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 10 - Reference of Disputes1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 11A - Tribunal's Power Regarding Punishment1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 12 - Duties of Conciliation Officers1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 17 - Publication of Reports and Awards1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 18(3) - Binding Nature of Settlement1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(cc) - Definition of Lay-off1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(j) - Definition of Industry - Bangalore Water Supply Test1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(j) - Subsequent Developments - State of UP v Jai Bir Singh1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(k) - Definition of Industrial Dispute1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(oo) - Definition of Retrenchment1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(p) - Definition of Settlement1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(q) - Definition of Strike1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(ra) - Definition of Negotiating Agent1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(ra) - Negotiating Union under the Industrial Relations Code Contrasted with Pre-Existing Position1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(ra) and Negotiating Agent - Historical Absence1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(s) - Definition of Workman1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 22 - Prohibition of Strikes and Lockouts in Public Utility Services1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25 - 25S Continuity of Service in Case of Transfer of Undertaking1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25 - Prohibition of Financial Aid to Illegal Strikes and Lockouts1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25-O and 25-N - Closure Permission1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25C - Disqualification from Lay-off Compensation1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25FFF - Compensation in Case of Closure1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25H - Re-employment of Retrenched Workmen1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25J - Effect of Laws Inconsistent with the Act1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25M - Restriction on Lay-off in Establishments Covered by Chapter VB1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25N - Conditions Precedent to Retrenchment in Chapter VB Establishments1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25T and 25U - Unfair Labour Practices1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2A - Individual Dispute Deemed Industrial Dispute1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 31 - Penalty for Illegal Strikes and Lockouts1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 33 - Conditions of Service During Pendency of Proceedings1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 33A - Special Provision for Adjudication of Complaints Regarding Contravention of Section 331
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 33C - Recovery of Money Due from Employer1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 36 - Representation of Parties1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 9A - Notice of Change1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 9C - Grievance Redressal Machinery1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Syndicate Bank v K Umesh Nayak1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - T.K. Rangarajan Case - No Fundamental Right to Strike1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Uday Narain Pandey Case - Last Come First Go Principle1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Workmen as a Class - Representative Capacity in Industrial Disputes1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Workmen of Dimakuchi Tea Estate Case1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Workmen of Indian Express Newspapers Case - Closure Compensation1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Workmen of Subong Tea Estate Case - Bonus and Customary Practice Distinguished from Statutory Bonus1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Workmen of Sudder Office Cinchona Case - Bonus and Customary Payments1
  • Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946 - Applicability1
  • Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946 - Model Standing Orders1
  • Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946 - Purpose and Scope1
  • Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act 1946 - Section 10A - Temporary Application Pending Certification1
  • Industrial Relations Code 2020 - Consolidation of Trade Union and Industrial Dispute Legislation1
  • Industrial Relations Code 2020 - Definition of Worker - Inclusion of Working Journalists and Sales Promotion Employees1
  • Industrial Relations Code 2020 - Fixed Term Employment1
  • Industrial Relations Code 2020 - Negotiating Union and Negotiating Council1
  • Industrial Relations Code 2020 - Re-Skilling Fund1
  • Industrial Relations Code 2020 - Threshold for Government Permission for Retrenchment1
  • Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act 1979 - Purpose and Registration Requirement1
  • Labour Law - Kahn Freund and Sociological Understanding of Labour Law1
  • Labour Law - Overall Significance of the National Commission on Labour Reports1
  • Maternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 11A - Creche Facility1
  • Maternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 12 - Dismissal During Pregnancy1
  • Maternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 3(o) - Eligibility - Qualifying Period1
  • Maternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 4 - Employment of Women During Certain Periods Prohibited1
  • Maternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 5 - Duration of Maternity Benefit (2017 Amendment)1
  • Maternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 5(3) - Commissioning and Adopting Mothers1
  • Maternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 6 - Notice of Claim for Maternity Benefit1
  • Mines Act 1952 - Section 2(1)(j) - Definition of Mine1
  • Mines Act 1952 - Section 46 - Prohibition of Employment of Persons Below Eighteen Years Underground1
  • Mines Act 1952 - Section 7 and 8 - Notice of Opening and Closing of Mines1
  • Minimum Wages Act 1948 - Section 3 - Fixation of Minimum Rates of Wages1
  • Occupational Safety Health and Working Conditions Code 2020 - Consolidation1
  • Occupational Safety Health and Working Conditions Code 2020 - Threshold for Factory Coverage1
  • Payment of Bonus Act 1965 - Section 10 and 11 - Minimum and Maximum Bonus1
  • Payment of Bonus Act 1965 - Section 32 - Establishments Excluded from the Act1
  • Payment of Bonus Act 1965 - Section 8 - Eligibility for Bonus1
  • Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 - Calculation of Gratuity Amount1
  • Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 - Section 4 - Eligibility for Gratuity1
  • Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 - Section 4(6) - Forfeiture of Gratuity1
  • Payment of Wages Act 1936 - Section 1 - Applicability1
  • Payment of Wages Act 1936 - Section 5 - Time of Payment of Wages1
  • Payment of Wages Act 1936 - Section 7 - Authorised Deductions1
  • Plantation Labour Act 1951 - Section 2(f) - Definition of Plantation1
  • Plantation Labour Act 1951 - Welfare Provisions - Housing and Medical Facilities1
  • Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act 2013 - Internal Complaints Committee1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Food Corporation of India Staff Union Case1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - In Re Inland Steam Navigation Workers Union Case1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - R.S. Ruikar Case - Criminal Immunity Applied1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Registrar of Trade Unions - Rangaswami Case1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Rohtas Industries Staff Union Case1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 10 - Cancellation of Registration1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 16 - Trade Union Not to be Unlawful for Purpose of Restraint of Trade1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 17 - Criminal Conspiracy Immunity1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 18 - Civil Immunity1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 2(h) - Definition of Trade Union1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 21A - Disqualifications of Office-Bearers1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 22 - Proportion of Office-Bearers to be Connected with the Industry1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 4 - Minimum Requirement for Registration1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 6 - Provisions to be Contained in Rules of a Trade Union1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 9A - Rules to Provide for Objects on Which General Funds May Be Spent1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Tamil Nadu Non-Gazetted Government Officers Union Case1
  • Unorganised Workers Social Security Act 2008 - Scope and Purpose1
Question 51MediumFactories Act 1948 - Section 2(m) - Definition of Factory

Under Section 2(m) of the Factories Act, 1948, a 'factory' is defined as any premises whereon ten or more workers are working, or were working on any day of the preceding twelve months, and in any part of which a manufacturing process is being carried on with the aid of power, or any premises whereon at least how many workers are working without the aid of power?

  1. A

    Five workers without the aid of power

  2. B

    Twenty workers are working, or were working on any day of the preceding twelve months, and in any part of which a manufacturing process is being carried on without the aid of power

  3. C

    One hundred workers without the aid of power

  4. D

    There is no separate threshold for premises operating without the aid of power

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Twenty workers are working, or were working on any day of the preceding twelve months, and in any part of which a manufacturing process is being carried on without the aid of power

Section 2(m) of the Factories Act, 1948 defines a factory using two alternative thresholds depending on whether power is used in the manufacturing process: (1) ten or more workers, where the manufacturing process is carried on with the aid of power; or (2) twenty or more workers, where the manufacturing process is carried on without the aid of power. This dual threshold recognises that power-driven manufacturing processes typically involve greater risks to worker safety and health, justifying a lower numerical threshold for the Act's protective provisions to apply, compared to non-power-driven processes.

Source note: Section 2(m), Factories Act 1948

Question 52MediumFactories Act 1948 - Chapter III - Health Provisions

Chapter III of the Factories Act, 1948 contains provisions relating to the health of workers in a factory. Which of the following is not among the specific matters addressed under this Chapter?

  1. A

    Cleanliness, disposal of wastes and effluents, ventilation and temperature, dust and fume, artificial humidification, overcrowding, lighting, drinking water, latrines and urinals, and spittoons

  2. B

    The minimum wage payable to skilled and unskilled workers across different industries

  3. C

    Section 11 specifically requires every factory to be kept clean and free from effluvia, with provisions for removal of dirt and wastes, and Section 17 requires sufficient and suitable lighting

  4. D

    Section 19 addresses the requirement of sufficient latrines and urinals of prescribed types, separately for male and female workers

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The minimum wage payable to skilled and unskilled workers across different industries

Chapter III of the Factories Act, 1948 (Sections 11-20) addresses health-related provisions for factory workers, covering matters such as cleanliness (Section 11), disposal of wastes and effluents (Section 12), ventilation and temperature (Section 13), dust and fume (Section 14), artificial humidification (Section 15), overcrowding (Section 16), lighting (Section 17), drinking water (Section 18), latrines and urinals (Section 19), and spittoons (Section 20). The minimum wage payable to workers is a matter governed by separate legislation, namely the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, and is not addressed within the health provisions of the Factories Act.

Source note: Sections 11-20, Factories Act 1948

Question 53HardFactories Act 1948 - Section 51 to 56 - Working Hours

Under the Factories Act, 1948, what is the maximum number of hours an adult worker may be required to work in a factory in any week, and what is the maximum number of hours in any single day?

  1. A

    No limit whatsoever is placed on weekly or daily working hours

  2. B

    Section 51 limits weekly working hours to 48, and Section 54 limits daily working hours to 9, subject to specified exceptions and the requirement under Section 56 that the total spread over, including rest intervals, shall not ordinarily exceed 10.5 hours unless extended by the Chief Inspector for specified reasons

  3. C

    Weekly hours are limited to 60 and daily hours have no separate limit

  4. D

    The limits apply only to female workers and not to male workers

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Section 51 limits weekly working hours to 48, and Section 54 limits daily working hours to 9, subject to specified exceptions and the requirement under Section 56 that the total spread over, including rest intervals, shall not ordinarily exceed 10.5 hours unless extended by the Chief Inspector for specified reasons

The Factories Act, 1948 imposes important limits on working hours to protect worker health and prevent excessive exploitation: Section 51 restricts weekly working hours for adult workers to a maximum of 48 hours, and Section 54 limits daily working hours to a maximum of 9 hours. Section 56 addresses the 'spread over', meaning the total period including rest intervals during which a worker is present at the factory, ordinarily restricting this to 10.5 hours, with the Chief Inspector having limited power to extend this spread over for specified reasons. These provisions reflect the Act's protective purpose in regulating working time to safeguard worker welfare.

Source note: Sections 51, 54, 56, Factories Act 1948

Question 54MediumFactories Act 1948 - Section 59 - Overtime Wages

Under Section 59 of the Factories Act, 1948, where a worker works in a factory for more than nine hours in any day or for more than forty-eight hours in any week, the worker is entitled to wages at:

  1. A

    The same ordinary rate of wages as for normal working hours, with no additional compensation

  2. B

    Twice his ordinary rate of wages for the overtime hours worked

  3. C

    Half his ordinary rate of wages, since overtime is considered a privilege rather than additional burden

  4. D

    A fixed flat fee determined solely at the discretion of the factory manager

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Twice his ordinary rate of wages for the overtime hours worked

Section 59 of the Factories Act, 1948 mandates that where a worker works in a factory for more than nine hours in a day or more than forty-eight hours in a week, the worker is entitled to wages at twice the ordinary rate of wages for the overtime hours worked. This provision serves both a compensatory function (ensuring workers are fairly remunerated for extended hours) and a deterrent function (discouraging employers from routinely extending working hours beyond the statutory limits by making it financially costly to do so).

Source note: Section 59, Factories Act 1948

Question 55MediumFactories Act 1948 - Section 79 - Annual Leave with Wages

Under Section 79 of the Factories Act, 1948, an adult worker who has worked for 240 days or more in a factory during a calendar year is entitled to leave with wages at the rate of:

  1. A

    One day for every 30 days of work performed during the previous calendar year

  2. B

    One day for every twenty days of work performed by him during the previous calendar year, with proportionate adjustment provisions and carry-forward rules subject to specified limits

  3. C

    No leave entitlement exists under the Factories Act for any category of worker

  4. D

    A fixed entitlement of 60 days regardless of the number of days actually worked

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. One day for every twenty days of work performed by him during the previous calendar year, with proportionate adjustment provisions and carry-forward rules subject to specified limits

Section 79 of the Factories Act, 1948 entitles an adult worker who has worked for at least 240 days during a calendar year to annual leave with wages calculated at the rate of one day for every twenty days of work performed during the previous calendar year. The provision also addresses how this leave may be carried forward (subject to a maximum accumulation limit) if not availed within the relevant period, and provides for proportionate calculation in certain circumstances, reflecting the Act's broader objective of ensuring workers receive adequate rest and recuperation periods as a statutory entitlement tied to their work record.

Source note: Section 79, Factories Act 1948

Question 56MediumMaternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 3(o) - Eligibility - Qualifying Period

Under Section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, a woman is entitled to maternity benefit if she has actually worked in an establishment for a period of not less than how many days in the twelve months immediately preceding the date of her expected delivery?

  1. A

    30 days

  2. B

    80 days

  3. C

    180 days

  4. D

    365 days

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. 80 days

Section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 specifies that a woman is entitled to maternity benefit only if she has actually worked in the establishment of the employer from whom she claims maternity benefit for a period of not less than eighty days in the twelve months immediately preceding the date of her expected delivery. This qualifying period requirement ensures the benefit is extended to women who have a genuine and substantial employment connection with the establishment, while the inclusion of the term 'actually worked' has been the subject of judicial interpretation regarding what activities count towards satisfying this threshold.

Source note: Section 5, Maternity Benefit Act 1961

Question 57HardMaternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 5 - Duration of Maternity Benefit (2017 Amendment)

Following the Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017, the maximum period for which a woman is entitled to maternity benefit was increased from twelve weeks to:

  1. A

    Sixteen weeks for all women regardless of the number of existing surviving children

  2. B

    Twenty-six weeks, with the proviso that the period before the expected date of delivery shall not exceed eight weeks; for a woman who has two or more surviving children, the duration of maternity benefit continues to be twelve weeks, with not more than six weeks preceding the expected delivery date

  3. C

    Fifty-two weeks for the first child only

  4. D

    There was no change made by the 2017 amendment to the duration of maternity benefit

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Twenty-six weeks, with the proviso that the period before the expected date of delivery shall not exceed eight weeks; for a woman who has two or more surviving children, the duration of maternity benefit continues to be twelve weeks, with not more than six weeks preceding the expected delivery date

The Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017 significantly enhanced maternity benefits in India by increasing the maximum duration of paid maternity leave from twelve weeks to twenty-six weeks for women with fewer than two surviving children, with a maximum of eight weeks permissible before the expected date of delivery (and the remainder to be availed after delivery). However, the amendment retained the shorter twelve-week duration (with a maximum of six weeks preceding delivery) for women who already have two or more surviving children, reflecting a population and family planning policy consideration embedded within the maternity benefit framework.

Source note: Section 5, Maternity Benefit Act 1961 (as amended by Maternity Benefit Amendment Act 2017)

Question 58HardMaternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 5(3) - Commissioning and Adopting Mothers

The Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017 extended maternity benefit entitlements to which additional categories of women, beyond biological mothers giving birth?

  1. A

    The amendment made no extension to any category beyond biological mothers who give birth themselves

  2. B

    A commissioning mother (defined as a biological mother who uses her egg to create an embryo implanted in another woman) and an adopting mother, who in case of legally adopting a child below the age of three months, is entitled to maternity benefit for a period of twelve weeks from the date the child is handed over to the adopting mother, or in the case of a commissioning mother, from the date the child is handed over to her

  3. C

    The amendment extended benefits only to fathers and not to any category of mother beyond the original provision

  4. D

    The amendment extended benefits exclusively to women working in government service and excluded all private sector commissioning or adopting mothers

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. A commissioning mother (defined as a biological mother who uses her egg to create an embryo implanted in another woman) and an adopting mother, who in case of legally adopting a child below the age of three months, is entitled to maternity benefit for a period of twelve weeks from the date the child is handed over to the adopting mother, or in the case of a commissioning mother, from the date the child is handed over to her

The Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017 introduced important extensions to recognise evolving family formation methods, providing maternity benefit to a 'commissioning mother' (a biological mother who uses her egg to create an embryo implanted in another woman, in the context of surrogacy arrangements) and to an 'adopting mother' who legally adopts a child below the age of three months. Both categories are entitled to maternity benefit for a period of twelve weeks from the relevant date the child is handed over, reflecting a significant modernisation of the statutory framework to address assisted reproduction and adoption scenarios that were not contemplated by the original 1961 Act.

Source note: Section 5(3), Maternity Benefit Act 1961 (as amended 2017)

Question 59HardMaternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 11A - Creche Facility

The Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017 inserted Section 11A, which requires every establishment having a prescribed number of employees to provide which facility?

  1. A

    A fully equipped gymnasium for all employees regardless of gender

  2. B

    A creche facility, within such distance as may be prescribed, either separately or along with common facilities, and the employer is required to allow four visits a day to the creche by the woman, which shall also include the interval for rest allowed to her

  3. C

    Free housing accommodation for the entire duration of the woman's employment with the establishment

  4. D

    A fully subsidised private vehicle for transportation to and from work for the duration of pregnancy

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. A creche facility, within such distance as may be prescribed, either separately or along with common facilities, and the employer is required to allow four visits a day to the creche by the woman, which shall also include the interval for rest allowed to her

Section 11A, inserted by the Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017, requires every establishment having a prescribed number of employees to provide creche facilities within a prescribed distance, either independently or in conjunction with common facilities shared among multiple establishments. The provision further requires the employer to permit the woman four visits a day to the creche, which include the interval for rest otherwise allowed to her, reflecting the legislative recognition that supporting working mothers requires not merely leave entitlements but also practical infrastructure facilitating continued workforce participation alongside childcare responsibilities.

Source note: Section 11A, Maternity Benefit Act 1961 (as inserted 2017)

Question 60MediumPayment of Wages Act 1936 - Section 1 - Applicability

The Payment of Wages Act, 1936 primarily applies to the payment of wages to which category of employees?

  1. A

    Only employees earning above a specified high wage ceiling who require additional statutory protection

  2. B

    Persons employed in factories, and persons employed upon railways (otherwise than as casual labour) and in industrial or other establishments specified in the Act, with the Act extending coverage to employed persons whose wages do not exceed a wage ceiling prescribed and periodically revised under the Act

  3. C

    Only self-employed persons operating their own independent businesses

  4. D

    Exclusively employees of foreign embassies and consulates located in India

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Persons employed in factories, and persons employed upon railways (otherwise than as casual labour) and in industrial or other establishments specified in the Act, with the Act extending coverage to employed persons whose wages do not exceed a wage ceiling prescribed and periodically revised under the Act

The Payment of Wages Act, 1936 is designed to regulate the payment of wages to certain classes of employed persons in establishments specified under the Act, including factories, railways, and other industrial establishments, with the Act's coverage subject to a wage ceiling that has been periodically revised through amendments to extend protection to a wider range of lower and middle-income wage earners. The Act's core purpose is to ensure that wages are paid in a timely manner, without unauthorised deductions, providing a statutory mechanism for employees to claim wages wrongfully withheld or delayed.

Source note: Section 1, Payment of Wages Act 1936

Question 61MediumPayment of Wages Act 1936 - Section 5 - Time of Payment of Wages

Under Section 5 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, wages of employed persons in an establishment with less than 1000 persons employed must be paid before the expiry of which day after the end of the wage period?

  1. A

    The 30th day after the end of the wage period in every case regardless of establishment size

  2. B

    The 7th day, in establishments employing less than 1000 persons; in establishments employing 1000 or more persons, wages must be paid before the expiry of the 10th day after the last day of the wage period in respect of which the wages are payable

  3. C

    There is no statutory time limit whatsoever for payment of wages under the Act

  4. D

    Wages must be paid only once every six months irrespective of the agreed wage period

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The 7th day, in establishments employing less than 1000 persons; in establishments employing 1000 or more persons, wages must be paid before the expiry of the 10th day after the last day of the wage period in respect of which the wages are payable

Section 5 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 prescribes specific time limits for the payment of wages depending on the size of the establishment: in establishments employing less than 1000 persons, wages must be paid before the expiry of the 7th day after the last day of the relevant wage period; in larger establishments employing 1000 or more persons, the time limit extends to the 10th day. These time-bound payment requirements protect employees from undue delay in receiving their earned wages, recognising the practical hardship that delayed wage payment can cause to workers dependent on regular income.

Source note: Section 5, Payment of Wages Act 1936

Question 62HardPayment of Wages Act 1936 - Section 7 - Authorised Deductions

Under Section 7 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, deductions from the wages of an employed person are permissible only in accordance with the provisions of the Act. Which of the following is not among the categories of authorised deductions specifically listed under the Act?

  1. A

    Deductions for fines imposed in accordance with the prescribed procedure, deductions for absence from duty, and deductions for damage to or loss of goods entrusted to the employed person

  2. B

    Deductions for income tax payable by the employed person, deductions for amounts payable under any law for the time being in force, and deductions for recovery of advances and loans

  3. C

    An arbitrary deduction imposed by the employer at his sole discretion for any reason not falling within any of the categories specifically enumerated in Section 7

  4. D

    Deductions for payments to cooperative societies and insurance schemes, subject to the consent of the employed person where required under the Act

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. An arbitrary deduction imposed by the employer at his sole discretion for any reason not falling within any of the categories specifically enumerated in Section 7

Section 7 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 provides an exhaustive list of permissible deductions from wages, which includes deductions for fines, absence from duty, damage to or loss of goods entrusted to the employee, house accommodation provided by the employer, recovery of advances and loans, income tax, amounts payable under any law, payments to cooperative societies, insurance premiums, and certain other specified categories. Crucially, the Act does not permit an employer to make an arbitrary deduction at his sole discretion for any reason outside this specifically enumerated list, reflecting the protective and exhaustive character of the statutory scheme that prevents unauthorised reduction of an employee's earned wages.

Source note: Section 7, Payment of Wages Act 1936

Question 63HardMinimum Wages Act 1948 - Section 3 - Fixation of Minimum Rates of Wages

Under Section 3 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, the appropriate government is empowered to fix the minimum rates of wages payable to employees in employment specified in the Schedule to the Act. Which of the following components may such minimum wage rates consist of?

  1. A

    A minimum rate of wages can only ever be fixed as a single consolidated time rate, with no flexibility for any other structure

  2. B

    A minimum rate of wages may consist of a basic rate of wages and a special allowance (cost of living allowance) at intervals and in the manner prescribed; or a basic rate of wages with or without the cost of living allowance and the cash value of concessions in respect of supplies of essential commodities at concession rates; or an all-inclusive rate allowing for the basic rate, cost of living allowance, and cash value of concessions, if any

  3. C

    Minimum wage rates can only be fixed in the form of non-monetary benefits such as food grains, with no monetary component permitted under any circumstances

  4. D

    The Act prohibits the appropriate government from fixing any minimum wage rate for any scheduled employment whatsoever

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. A minimum rate of wages may consist of a basic rate of wages and a special allowance (cost of living allowance) at intervals and in the manner prescribed; or a basic rate of wages with or without the cost of living allowance and the cash value of concessions in respect of supplies of essential commodities at concession rates; or an all-inclusive rate allowing for the basic rate, cost of living allowance, and cash value of concessions, if any

Section 3 read with Section 4 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 provides flexibility in how minimum wage rates may be structured, allowing for: (1) a basic rate plus a special allowance adjusted at prescribed intervals to address cost of living variations (a dearness allowance type structure); (2) a basic rate with or without a cost of living allowance, combined with the cash value of concessions for essential commodities supplied at concessional rates; or (3) an all-inclusive rate incorporating the basic rate, cost of living allowance, and cash value of concessions together. This flexible structure allows the appropriate government to design wage fixation mechanisms suited to the particular scheduled employment and local economic conditions.

Source note: Sections 3-4, Minimum Wages Act 1948

Question 64MediumPayment of Bonus Act 1965 - Section 8 - Eligibility for Bonus

Under Section 8 of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, an employee is entitled to bonus from his employer in an accounting year, provided he has worked in the establishment for not less than how many working days in that accounting year?

  1. A

    Ten working days

  2. B

    Thirty working days

  3. C

    Ninety working days

  4. D

    There is no minimum working days requirement under the Act

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Thirty working days

Section 8 of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 entitles every employee to be paid bonus by his employer in respect of an accounting year, provided he has worked in the establishment for not less than thirty working days in that accounting year. This qualifying period ensures that the statutory bonus entitlement, designed as a form of profit-sharing and incentive linked to the employer's allocable surplus, is reserved for employees with a genuine and meaningful employment connection to the establishment during the relevant accounting period, rather than extending to extremely short-term or transient engagements.

Source note: Section 8, Payment of Bonus Act 1965

Question 65HardPayment of Bonus Act 1965 - Section 10 and 11 - Minimum and Maximum Bonus

Under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, what are the statutorily prescribed minimum and maximum percentages of bonus payable to an eligible employee, subject to the calculation of allocable surplus under the Act?

  1. A

    Minimum bonus of 8.33% of salary or wage earned during the accounting year (or a prescribed minimum amount, whichever is higher), and a maximum bonus of 20% of such salary or wage, subject to the available and allocable surplus calculated in accordance with the provisions of the Act

  2. B

    Minimum bonus of 50% and maximum bonus of 100% in all cases regardless of the employer's profitability

  3. C

    There is no minimum bonus requirement and the maximum bonus is capped at 5%

  4. D

    The bonus percentage is fixed permanently at exactly 10% with no minimum or maximum variation permitted under any circumstances

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Minimum bonus of 8.33% of salary or wage earned during the accounting year (or a prescribed minimum amount, whichever is higher), and a maximum bonus of 20% of such salary or wage, subject to the available and allocable surplus calculated in accordance with the provisions of the Act

Section 10 of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 mandates a minimum bonus of 8.33% of the salary or wages earned by the employee during the accounting year (or a specified minimum rupee amount, whichever is higher), payable even where the employer has suffered losses in the accounting year, reflecting the legislative recognition that bonus, while linked to profit-sharing, also has a guaranteed minimum statutory floor. Section 11 provides for a maximum bonus of 20% of salary or wages, payable where the available surplus exceeds the amount required for minimum bonus, with the actual percentage between this minimum and maximum determined based on the calculation of allocable surplus under the formula prescribed by the Act.

Source note: Sections 10-11, Payment of Bonus Act 1965

Question 66MediumEmployees Provident Funds Act 1952 - Section 1 - Applicability

The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 applies to establishments employing how many or more persons, subject to the categories of establishment specified in the Schedule?

  1. A

    At least five persons in any establishment of any kind

  2. B

    Twenty or more persons, as specified in the Schedule to the Act, though the Central Government has the power to extend the Act's application to establishments employing fewer than twenty persons by notification

  3. C

    At least one thousand persons in any establishment

  4. D

    The Act applies only to establishments owned exclusively by the Central Government

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Twenty or more persons, as specified in the Schedule to the Act, though the Central Government has the power to extend the Act's application to establishments employing fewer than twenty persons by notification

The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 generally applies to establishments employing twenty or more persons, falling within the categories of industries or classes of establishments specified in Schedule I to the Act, or those to which the Act has otherwise been made applicable by notification. The Central Government retains the power under the Act to extend its application to establishments employing fewer than the standard threshold of twenty persons, allowing for flexible expansion of social security coverage as policy considerations warrant, reflecting the Act's broader purpose of providing retirement and social security benefits to industrial workers.

Source note: Section 1, Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952

Question 67MediumEmployees Provident Funds Act 1952 - Schemes Under the Act

The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 provides for the framing of which three principal schemes?

  1. A

    Only a single unified scheme covering all aspects of employee welfare with no separate distinct schemes

  2. B

    The Employees' Provident Fund Scheme (providing for retirement savings accumulated through joint employer-employee contributions), the Employees' Pension Scheme (providing pension benefits to employees and their families), and the Employees' Deposit-Linked Insurance Scheme (providing life insurance benefits to the family of an employee who dies while in service)

  3. C

    Only a health insurance scheme covering hospitalisation expenses for employees and their families

  4. D

    Only an unemployment benefit scheme paying compensation to employees who voluntarily resign from their employment

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The Employees' Provident Fund Scheme (providing for retirement savings accumulated through joint employer-employee contributions), the Employees' Pension Scheme (providing pension benefits to employees and their families), and the Employees' Deposit-Linked Insurance Scheme (providing life insurance benefits to the family of an employee who dies while in service)

The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 establishes a framework for three principal and distinct schemes: the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme (the primary retirement savings mechanism funded through mandatory joint contributions from employer and employee), the Employees' Pension Scheme (providing periodic pension benefits to eligible employees upon retirement and to their families in the event of the employee's death), and the Employees' Deposit-Linked Insurance Scheme (providing a life insurance benefit payable to the nominee or family of an employee who dies while still in service). Together, these three schemes form a comprehensive social security architecture addressing retirement savings, pension, and life insurance needs of covered employees.

Source note: Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952 - Schemes

Question 68MediumEmployees State Insurance Act 1948 - Purpose and Scope

The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 is designed to provide which category of benefits to covered employees?

  1. A

    Only retirement pension benefits identical to those provided under the Employees Provident Funds Act, with no other category of benefit

  2. B

    Certain benefits to employees in case of sickness, maternity, and employment injury, and to provide for certain other matters in relation thereto, through a contributory social insurance scheme funded by contributions from both employers and employees, administered through the Employees' State Insurance Corporation

  3. C

    Only educational scholarships for the children of covered employees, with no health or insurance-related benefits

  4. D

    Exclusively housing loan subsidies for employees purchasing residential property

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Certain benefits to employees in case of sickness, maternity, and employment injury, and to provide for certain other matters in relation thereto, through a contributory social insurance scheme funded by contributions from both employers and employees, administered through the Employees' State Insurance Corporation

The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 establishes a comprehensive social insurance scheme designed to provide specified categories of benefits to covered employees, principally addressing sickness, maternity, and employment injury (including resulting disablement or death), along with certain other related benefits such as medical care for the employee and dependants. The scheme is contributory in nature, funded through periodic contributions from both employers and employees calculated as a percentage of wages, and is administered by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation, a statutory body established under the Act, which manages the fund and the network of dispensaries and hospitals providing medical benefits to insured persons and their families.

Source note: Employees State Insurance Act 1948

Question 69HardEmployees Compensation Act 1923 - Section 3 - Employer's Liability for Compensation

Under Section 3 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 (formerly the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923), an employer is liable to pay compensation to an employee for personal injury caused to the employee by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, subject to certain exceptions. Which of the following circumstances would generally exclude the employer's liability?

  1. A

    The employer is liable to pay compensation in every conceivable circumstance with absolutely no exceptions of any kind

  2. B

    Where the injury does not result in total or partial disablement of the employee for a period exceeding three days; or where the injury is caused by an accident directly attributable to the employee having been at the time of the accident under the influence of drink or drugs, or wilful disobedience of an order expressly given or a rule expressly framed for securing safety, or wilful removal or disregard of a safety device, provided the injury does not result in death or permanent total disablement

  3. C

    The employer is exempted from liability whenever the accident occurs on a Sunday or public holiday

  4. D

    The employer is exempted from liability whenever the employee earns a salary exceeding a specified threshold, regardless of any other factor

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Where the injury does not result in total or partial disablement of the employee for a period exceeding three days; or where the injury is caused by an accident directly attributable to the employee having been at the time of the accident under the influence of drink or drugs, or wilful disobedience of an order expressly given or a rule expressly framed for securing safety, or wilful removal or disregard of a safety device, provided the injury does not result in death or permanent total disablement

Section 3 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 establishes the principle of employer liability for compensation for personal injury caused by accidents arising out of and in the course of employment, subject to specified exceptions. These exceptions include: injuries not resulting in disablement for more than three days; and injuries attributable to the employee's intoxication, wilful disobedience of safety-related orders or rules, or wilful disregard of safety devices, though importantly even these latter exceptions do not exempt the employer from liability where the resulting injury leads to death or permanent total disablement, reflecting a policy balance between holding employers accountable for workplace safety and not penalising employers for genuinely employee-caused minor injuries while still providing a backstop of liability in the most serious outcomes.

Source note: Section 3, Employees Compensation Act 1923

Question 70HardCode on Wages 2019 - Consolidation of Wage Legislation

The Code on Wages, 2019 was enacted with the objective of consolidating and simplifying which previously separate central labour legislations relating to wages?

  1. A

    The Code on Wages consolidates only criminal law statutes with no connection to wage-related legislation

  2. B

    The Code on Wages, 2019 consolidates and subsumes the Payment of Wages Act, 1936; the Minimum Wages Act, 1948.

  3. C

    The Code consolidates only the Factories Act, 1948 and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, with no reference to any wage-specific legislation

  4. D

    The Code on Wages applies exclusively to government employees and excludes private sector wage regulation entirely

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The Code on Wages, 2019 consolidates and subsumes the Payment of Wages Act, 1936; the Minimum Wages Act, 1948.

The Code on Wages, 2019 represents part of a broader legislative effort to consolidate and simplify India's labour law framework by merging four previously separate central enactments relating to wages: the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (regulating timely payment and authorised deductions); the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (regulating fixation of minimum wage rates); the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 (regulating statutory bonus entitlements); and the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 (mandating equal pay for equal work regardless of gender). This consolidation forms part of the broader codification of Indian labour law into four principal labour codes, alongside the Industrial Relations Code, the Code on Social Security, and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code.

Source note: Code on Wages 2019

Question 71HardCode on Wages 2019 - Universal Minimum Wage Concept

A significant policy innovation introduced by the Code on Wages, 2019 is the concept of a 'floor wage'. What is the significance of this concept?

  1. A

    The floor wage is purely an architectural term relating to factory floor design with no connection to employee compensation

  2. B

    The Central Government is empowered to fix a 'floor wage' taking into account the minimum living standards of a worker, and the minimum wages fixed by the appropriate governments (whether Central or State) for various scheduled employments cannot be lower than the floor wage, thereby establishing a national wage floor below which no state or category of employment can fix minimum wages

  3. C

    The floor wage applies exclusively to agricultural workers and excludes all other categories of employment

  4. D

    The concept of floor wage was entirely removed from the Code on Wages before its enactment and has no operative legal effect

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The Central Government is empowered to fix a 'floor wage' taking into account the minimum living standards of a worker, and the minimum wages fixed by the appropriate governments (whether Central or State) for various scheduled employments cannot be lower than the floor wage, thereby establishing a national wage floor below which no state or category of employment can fix minimum wages

The Code on Wages, 2019 introduces the concept of a 'floor wage' as a significant policy innovation, empowering the Central Government to fix a national floor wage having regard to the minimum living standards of a worker, potentially varying by geographical area to account for regional cost-of-living differences. Crucially, minimum wages fixed by appropriate governments (whether the Central Government or various State Governments) for different scheduled employments cannot be set below this floor wage, establishing a national wage floor that aims to bring greater uniformity and a guaranteed minimum baseline across the country's historically fragmented and variable minimum wage landscape, addressing long-standing concerns about wide and sometimes arbitrary disparities in minimum wage rates across different states and employment categories.

Source note: Code on Wages 2019 - Floor Wage Provisions

Question 72MediumEqual Remuneration Act 1976 - Section 4 - Equal Pay for Equal Work

Under Section 4 of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976, no employer shall pay to any worker, employed by him in the same establishment or employment, remuneration at rates less favourable than those at which remuneration is paid by him to workers of the opposite sex, for performing:

  1. A

    Any work whatsoever, regardless of the nature, skill, effort, or responsibility involved

  2. B

    The same work or work of a similar nature; the Act defines 'same work or work of a similar nature' as work in respect of which the skill, effort, and responsibility required are the same, when performed under similar working conditions, by a man and a woman

  3. C

    Only work performed in the agricultural sector, with no application to industrial or service sector employment

  4. D

    Work performed exclusively during night shift hours, with no application to daytime employment

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The same work or work of a similar nature; the Act defines 'same work or work of a similar nature' as work in respect of which the skill, effort, and responsibility required are the same, when performed under similar working conditions, by a man and a woman

Section 4 of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 mandates that employers must not discriminate in remuneration between male and female workers performing 'the same work or work of a similar nature'. The Act defines this term to mean work in respect of which the skill, effort, and responsibility required are substantially the same, when performed under similar working conditions, by workers of either gender. This functional, substance-based test, rather than a purely formal comparison of job titles, ensures that the principle of equal pay for equal work cannot be circumvented through superficial differences in designation or job description that do not reflect genuine differences in the underlying skill, effort, or responsibility involved.

Source note: Section 4, Equal Remuneration Act 1976

Question 73HardContract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act 1970 - Section 1 - Applicability and Purpose

The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 was enacted with which dual objective?

  1. A

    The Act exists solely to promote and expand the use of contract labour with no regulatory or abolitionary purpose whatsoever

  2. B

    The Act aims to regulate the employment of contract labour in certain establishments and to provide for its abolition in certain circumstances, particularly where the work performed by contract labour is of a perennial nature that could be performed by regular workmen, while also requiring registration of principal employers and licensing of contractors, and ensuring welfare amenities for contract labourers where abolition is not implemented

  3. C

    The Act applies exclusively to agricultural labour and has no application to industrial or commercial establishments

  4. D

    The Act was enacted purely to regulate matters of international labour migration with no domestic application

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The Act aims to regulate the employment of contract labour in certain establishments and to provide for its abolition in certain circumstances, particularly where the work performed by contract labour is of a perennial nature that could be performed by regular workmen, while also requiring registration of principal employers and licensing of contractors, and ensuring welfare amenities for contract labourers where abolition is not implemented

The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 reflects a dual legislative objective, as captured in its title: regulation and abolition. The regulatory dimension requires registration of establishments employing contract labour (principal employers) and licensing of contractors supplying such labour, along with mandated welfare amenities (such as canteens, rest rooms, and first aid facilities) for contract workers. The abolitionary dimension empowers the appropriate government to prohibit the employment of contract labour in specific processes, operations, or other work in any establishment, particularly where such work is found to be of a perennial nature reasonably performable by regular employees, addressing concerns that the contract labour system can be misused to deny workers the security and benefits associated with regular, direct employment for what is effectively permanent and ongoing work.

Source note: Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act 1970

Question 74HardContract Labour Act 1970 - Steel Authority of India Case - Automatic Absorption Question

In Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. National Union Waterfront Workers, the Supreme Court addressed a significant question regarding the consequence of a prohibition notification issued under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970. What did the Court hold regarding automatic absorption of contract labourers into the principal employer's regular workforce upon such prohibition?

  1. A

    That a prohibition notification under Section 10 automatically and necessarily results in the absorption of all affected contract labourers as regular employees of the principal employer

  2. B

    That a notification issued under Section 10 prohibiting employment of contract labour does not automatically result in the absorption of the contract labourers as regular employees of the principal employer; the prohibition merely prevents the future continuation of the contract labour system in respect of the specified process, and any claim to absorption would need to be independently established, overruling the earlier position taken in Air India Statutory Corporation v.

  3. C

    That contract labourers can never under any circumstances be absorbed into the regular workforce of the principal employer regardless of the facts

  4. D

    The case held that the Contract Labour Act has no provision whatsoever for prohibition of contract labour in any circumstances

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. That a notification issued under Section 10 prohibiting employment of contract labour does not automatically result in the absorption of the contract labourers as regular employees of the principal employer; the prohibition merely prevents the future continuation of the contract labour system in respect of the specified process, and any claim to absorption would need to be independently established, overruling the earlier position taken in Air India Statutory Corporation v.

In Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. National Union Waterfront Workers, a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court significantly clarified and revised the law regarding the consequence of a Section 10 prohibition notification, holding that such a notification prohibiting the future employment of contract labour in a specified process or operation does not automatically result in the absorption of the existing contract labourers as regular employees of the principal employer. This overruled the earlier position taken in Air India Statutory Corporation v. United Labour Union, which had suggested automatic absorption flowed from a prohibition notification, and clarified that any claim to regularisation or absorption would need to be independently established through appropriate proceedings rather than being an automatic statutory consequence of the prohibition itself.

Source note: Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. National Union Waterfront Workers; Section 10, Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act 1970

Question 75HardCode on Social Security 2020 - Consolidation of Social Security Legislation

The Code on Social Security, 2020 consolidates and subsumes which group of previously separate social security legislations?

  1. A

    The Code on Social Security has no connection whatsoever to any prior social security legislation and was drafted entirely without reference to any existing statute

  2. B

    The Code subsumes legislations including the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

  3. C

    The Code consolidates exclusively criminal procedure legislation with no connection to social security matters

  4. D

    The Code applies only to social security benefits for members of Parliament and excludes all other categories of workers

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The Code subsumes legislations including the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

The Code on Social Security, 2020 forms part of the broader labour law codification exercise in India, consolidating numerous previously separate social security related enactments into a single comprehensive code. This includes the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (retirement and pension benefits), the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (sickness, maternity, and employment injury insurance), the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 (workplace injury compensation), the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 (maternity leave and benefits), the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (gratuity on termination of long service), and several other related statutes, reflecting a comprehensive attempt to streamline India's previously fragmented social security legal framework into a unified structure.

Source note: Code on Social Security 2020