Labour Law MCQs for Judiciary, Page 4

Judiciary Labour Law questions 76-100 of 150, with answer keys and explanations covering industrial disputes, trade unions, standing orders, wages, social security, occupational safety, and labour codes.

150 questions150 topics76-100 on this page

Topics in this subject

Practice judiciary exam MCQs with answers and explanations across substantive law, procedure, evidence, constitutional law, and state judicial service subjects.

  • Apprentices Act 1961 - Purpose and Scope1
  • Apprentices Act 1961 - Section 18 - Status of Apprentices1
  • Building and Other Construction Workers Act 1996 - Purpose and Cess1
  • Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act 1986 - Prohibition and Amendment1
  • Code on Social Security 2020 - Aggregator and Gig Worker Contribution Mechanism1
  • Code on Social Security 2020 - Consolidation of Social Security Legislation1
  • Code on Social Security 2020 - Gig and Platform Workers1
  • Code on Social Security 2020 - Maternity Benefit Provisions Retained from the 1961 Act1
  • Code on Wages 2019 - Consolidation of Wage Legislation1
  • Code on Wages 2019 - Definition of Wages - Inclusions and Exclusions1
  • Code on Wages 2019 - Gender Neutrality in Wage Provisions1
  • Code on Wages 2019 - Section 18 - Time Period for Payment of Wages1
  • Code on Wages 2019 - Section 26 - Bonus Eligibility Wage Ceiling1
  • Code on Wages 2019 - Section 30 - Maintenance of Registers, Records, and Returns1
  • Code on Wages 2019 - Section 9 - Components of Minimum Wage1
  • Code on Wages 2019 - Universal Minimum Wage Concept1
  • Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act 1970 - Section 1 - Applicability and Purpose1
  • Contract Labour Act 1970 - Steel Authority of India Case - Automatic Absorption Question1
  • Employees Compensation Act 1923 - Section 10 - Notice and Claim1
  • Employees Compensation Act 1923 - Section 3 - Employer's Liability for Compensation1
  • Employees Compensation Act 1923 - Section 4 - Calculation of Compensation Amount1
  • Employees Provident Funds Act 1952 - Schemes Under the Act1
  • Employees Provident Funds Act 1952 - Section 1 - Applicability1
  • Employees Provident Funds Act 1952 - Section 7A - Determination of Moneys Due from Employers1
  • Employees State Insurance Act 1948 - Purpose and Scope1
  • Employees State Insurance Act 1948 - Section 38 - All Employees to be Insured1
  • Equal Remuneration Act 1976 - Section 4 - Equal Pay for Equal Work1
  • Essential Services Maintenance Act 1981 - Purpose and Effect1
  • Factories Act 1948 - Chapter III - Health Provisions1
  • Factories Act 1948 - Section 2(m) - Definition of Factory1
  • Factories Act 1948 - Section 51 to 56 - Working Hours1
  • Factories Act 1948 - Section 59 - Overtime Wages1
  • Factories Act 1948 - Section 67 - Prohibition of Employment of Young Children1
  • Factories Act 1948 - Section 79 - Annual Leave with Wages1
  • Factories Act 1948 - Section 87 - Prohibition of Employment in Dangerous Operations1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - A. Sundarambal Case - Teachers as Workmen1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Air India v Nargesh Meerza Case - Discriminatory Service Conditions1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Chapter VA - Lay-off Compensation under Section 25C1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Chapter VB - Special Provisions for Large Establishments1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Concept of Industrial Adjudication versus Ordinary Civil Adjudication1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Deepali Gundu Surwase Case - Back Wages on Reinstatement1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Dharangadhra Chemical Works - Control and Supervision Test1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Essorpe Mills Case - Domestic Inquiry and Natural Justice1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Fifth Schedule - Unfair Labour Practices by Employers1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Fifth Schedule - Unfair Labour Practices by Workmen and Trade Unions1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Fire Stone Tyre & Rubber Co Case - Continuous Service1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - H.R. Adyanthaya Case - Predominant Nature of Duties Test1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Hindustan Steel Limited v Workmen - Domestic Inquiry Standards1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - J.H. Jadhav Case - Individual vs Industrial Dispute1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Management of Chandramalai Estate - Legality vs Justifiability of Strike1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Municipal Corporation of Delhi v Female Workers1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Punjab Land Development Case - Section 25F Compliance1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 10 - Reference of Disputes1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 11A - Tribunal's Power Regarding Punishment1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 12 - Duties of Conciliation Officers1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 17 - Publication of Reports and Awards1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 18(3) - Binding Nature of Settlement1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(cc) - Definition of Lay-off1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(j) - Definition of Industry - Bangalore Water Supply Test1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(j) - Subsequent Developments - State of UP v Jai Bir Singh1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(k) - Definition of Industrial Dispute1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(oo) - Definition of Retrenchment1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(p) - Definition of Settlement1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(q) - Definition of Strike1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(ra) - Definition of Negotiating Agent1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(ra) - Negotiating Union under the Industrial Relations Code Contrasted with Pre-Existing Position1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(ra) and Negotiating Agent - Historical Absence1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2(s) - Definition of Workman1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 22 - Prohibition of Strikes and Lockouts in Public Utility Services1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25 - 25S Continuity of Service in Case of Transfer of Undertaking1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25 - Prohibition of Financial Aid to Illegal Strikes and Lockouts1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25-O and 25-N - Closure Permission1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25C - Disqualification from Lay-off Compensation1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25FFF - Compensation in Case of Closure1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25H - Re-employment of Retrenched Workmen1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25J - Effect of Laws Inconsistent with the Act1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25M - Restriction on Lay-off in Establishments Covered by Chapter VB1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25N - Conditions Precedent to Retrenchment in Chapter VB Establishments1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 25T and 25U - Unfair Labour Practices1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 2A - Individual Dispute Deemed Industrial Dispute1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 31 - Penalty for Illegal Strikes and Lockouts1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 33 - Conditions of Service During Pendency of Proceedings1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 33A - Special Provision for Adjudication of Complaints Regarding Contravention of Section 331
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 33C - Recovery of Money Due from Employer1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 36 - Representation of Parties1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 9A - Notice of Change1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 9C - Grievance Redressal Machinery1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Syndicate Bank v K Umesh Nayak1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - T.K. Rangarajan Case - No Fundamental Right to Strike1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Uday Narain Pandey Case - Last Come First Go Principle1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Workmen as a Class - Representative Capacity in Industrial Disputes1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Workmen of Dimakuchi Tea Estate Case1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Workmen of Indian Express Newspapers Case - Closure Compensation1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Workmen of Subong Tea Estate Case - Bonus and Customary Practice Distinguished from Statutory Bonus1
  • Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Workmen of Sudder Office Cinchona Case - Bonus and Customary Payments1
  • Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946 - Applicability1
  • Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946 - Model Standing Orders1
  • Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946 - Purpose and Scope1
  • Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act 1946 - Section 10A - Temporary Application Pending Certification1
  • Industrial Relations Code 2020 - Consolidation of Trade Union and Industrial Dispute Legislation1
  • Industrial Relations Code 2020 - Definition of Worker - Inclusion of Working Journalists and Sales Promotion Employees1
  • Industrial Relations Code 2020 - Fixed Term Employment1
  • Industrial Relations Code 2020 - Negotiating Union and Negotiating Council1
  • Industrial Relations Code 2020 - Re-Skilling Fund1
  • Industrial Relations Code 2020 - Threshold for Government Permission for Retrenchment1
  • Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act 1979 - Purpose and Registration Requirement1
  • Labour Law - Kahn Freund and Sociological Understanding of Labour Law1
  • Labour Law - Overall Significance of the National Commission on Labour Reports1
  • Maternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 11A - Creche Facility1
  • Maternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 12 - Dismissal During Pregnancy1
  • Maternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 3(o) - Eligibility - Qualifying Period1
  • Maternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 4 - Employment of Women During Certain Periods Prohibited1
  • Maternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 5 - Duration of Maternity Benefit (2017 Amendment)1
  • Maternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 5(3) - Commissioning and Adopting Mothers1
  • Maternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 6 - Notice of Claim for Maternity Benefit1
  • Mines Act 1952 - Section 2(1)(j) - Definition of Mine1
  • Mines Act 1952 - Section 46 - Prohibition of Employment of Persons Below Eighteen Years Underground1
  • Mines Act 1952 - Section 7 and 8 - Notice of Opening and Closing of Mines1
  • Minimum Wages Act 1948 - Section 3 - Fixation of Minimum Rates of Wages1
  • Occupational Safety Health and Working Conditions Code 2020 - Consolidation1
  • Occupational Safety Health and Working Conditions Code 2020 - Threshold for Factory Coverage1
  • Payment of Bonus Act 1965 - Section 10 and 11 - Minimum and Maximum Bonus1
  • Payment of Bonus Act 1965 - Section 32 - Establishments Excluded from the Act1
  • Payment of Bonus Act 1965 - Section 8 - Eligibility for Bonus1
  • Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 - Calculation of Gratuity Amount1
  • Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 - Section 4 - Eligibility for Gratuity1
  • Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 - Section 4(6) - Forfeiture of Gratuity1
  • Payment of Wages Act 1936 - Section 1 - Applicability1
  • Payment of Wages Act 1936 - Section 5 - Time of Payment of Wages1
  • Payment of Wages Act 1936 - Section 7 - Authorised Deductions1
  • Plantation Labour Act 1951 - Section 2(f) - Definition of Plantation1
  • Plantation Labour Act 1951 - Welfare Provisions - Housing and Medical Facilities1
  • Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act 2013 - Internal Complaints Committee1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Food Corporation of India Staff Union Case1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - In Re Inland Steam Navigation Workers Union Case1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - R.S. Ruikar Case - Criminal Immunity Applied1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Registrar of Trade Unions - Rangaswami Case1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Rohtas Industries Staff Union Case1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 10 - Cancellation of Registration1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 16 - Trade Union Not to be Unlawful for Purpose of Restraint of Trade1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 17 - Criminal Conspiracy Immunity1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 18 - Civil Immunity1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 2(h) - Definition of Trade Union1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 21A - Disqualifications of Office-Bearers1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 22 - Proportion of Office-Bearers to be Connected with the Industry1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 4 - Minimum Requirement for Registration1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 6 - Provisions to be Contained in Rules of a Trade Union1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Section 9A - Rules to Provide for Objects on Which General Funds May Be Spent1
  • Trade Unions Act 1926 - Tamil Nadu Non-Gazetted Government Officers Union Case1
  • Unorganised Workers Social Security Act 2008 - Scope and Purpose1
Question 76MediumPayment of Gratuity Act 1972 - Section 4 - Eligibility for Gratuity

Under Section 4 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, gratuity is payable to an employee on the termination of his employment after he has rendered continuous service for not less than how many years, except in the case of death or disablement?

  1. A

    One year of continuous service

  2. B

    Five years of continuous service

  3. C

    Ten years of continuous service

  4. D

    There is no minimum continuous service requirement, and gratuity is payable from the very first day of employment

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Five years of continuous service

Section 4 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 mandates that gratuity shall be payable to an employee on the termination of his employment (whether by superannuation, retirement, resignation, death, or disablement) after he has rendered continuous service for not less than five years, except that the five-year continuous service condition is specifically not required in cases of termination of employment due to death or disablement, recognising that in these unfortunate circumstances the employee or their dependants should not be denied the gratuity benefit merely because the qualifying period had not yet been completed.

Source note: Section 4, Payment of Gratuity Act 1972

Question 77MediumPayment of Gratuity Act 1972 - Calculation of Gratuity Amount

Under Section 4(2) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, for every completed year of service (or part thereof in excess of six months), the employer must pay gratuity to an employee at the rate of:

  1. A

    Thirty days' wages based on the wages last drawn by the employee

  2. B

    Fifteen days' wages based on the rate of wages last drawn by the employee concerned, calculated based on a specific divisor (typically 26 days for monthly rated employees) for ascertaining the daily wage rate

  3. C

    Sixty days' wages regardless of the actual wage rate of the employee

  4. D

    A fixed flat sum determined solely by the appropriate government with no relationship to the employee's actual wage rate

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Fifteen days' wages based on the rate of wages last drawn by the employee concerned, calculated based on a specific divisor (typically 26 days for monthly rated employees) for ascertaining the daily wage rate

Section 4(2) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 prescribes that for every completed year of service, or part thereof in excess of six months, the employer must pay gratuity at the rate of fifteen days' wages based on the rate of wages last drawn by the employee. For monthly rated employees, this fifteen days' wage is typically calculated by dividing the monthly wage by twenty-six (reflecting the typical number of working days in a month) and multiplying by fifteen, then multiplying this result by the number of completed years of service, subject to the statutory ceiling on the maximum gratuity amount payable under the Act.

Source note: Section 4(2), Payment of Gratuity Act 1972

Question 78HardIndustrial Relations Code 2020 - Consolidation of Trade Union and Industrial Dispute Legislation

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 consolidates and subsumes which previously separate central labour legislations relating to industrial relations?

  1. A

    The Industrial Relations Code has no connection to any prior legislation and creates an entirely novel and unrelated regulatory framework

  2. B

    The Code subsumes the Trade Unions Act, 1926; the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.

  3. C

    The Code consolidates exclusively legislation relating to international trade tariffs and import-export regulations

  4. D

    The Code applies only to disputes between two private companies in unrelated industries and excludes all employer-employee industrial disputes

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The Code subsumes the Trade Unions Act, 1926; the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 consolidates three previously separate but interrelated central labour enactments that collectively governed industrial relations in India: the Trade Unions Act, 1926 (governing registration, regulation, and legal protection of trade unions); the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 (requiring certified standing orders defining conditions of employment in larger industrial establishments); and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (providing the comprehensive machinery for investigation, conciliation, and adjudication of industrial disputes, along with provisions on lay-off, retrenchment, closure, and strikes/lockouts). This consolidation brings together the foundational statutory architecture of Indian collective labour relations into a unified code, while introducing certain substantive and procedural modifications to the previously separate frameworks.

Source note: Industrial Relations Code 2020

Question 79HardIndustrial Relations Code 2020 - Threshold for Government Permission for Retrenchment

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020, in relation to the requirement of prior government permission before lay-off, retrenchment, or closure (corresponding to Chapter vb of the erstwhile Industrial Disputes Act), revised the applicable threshold for establishments. What change did the Code introduce regarding this threshold?

  1. A

    The Code completely eliminated the requirement of prior government permission for any establishment regardless of size

  2. B

    The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 increased the threshold for the requirement of prior government permission for lay-off, retrenchment, and closure from 100 workers (as under the erstwhile Chapter vb of the Industrial Disputes Act) to establishments employing 300 or more workers, while also empowering the appropriate government to increase this threshold further by notification, reflecting a policy shift towards providing greater operational flexibility to industrial establishments of a wider range of sizes

  3. C

    The Code reduced the threshold to exactly 10 workers, making the permission requirement applicable to nearly all establishments

  4. D

    The threshold under the Industrial Relations Code applies only to establishments in the information technology sector and excludes manufacturing establishments entirely

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 increased the threshold for the requirement of prior government permission for lay-off, retrenchment, and closure from 100 workers (as under the erstwhile Chapter vb of the Industrial Disputes Act) to establishments employing 300 or more workers, while also empowering the appropriate government to increase this threshold further by notification, reflecting a policy shift towards providing greater operational flexibility to industrial establishments of a wider range of sizes

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 introduced a significant policy change by increasing the threshold for the requirement of prior government permission before lay-off, retrenchment, or closure from the erstwhile 100-worker threshold under Chapter VB of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, to a higher threshold of 300 or more workers. The Code also empowers the appropriate government to further increase this threshold by notification, reflecting a policy direction aimed at providing greater operational and workforce flexibility to a larger category of industrial establishments that would previously have been required to seek prior government permission, a change that has generated considerable debate regarding the appropriate balance between worker protection and ease of doing business considerations.

Source note: Industrial Relations Code 2020

Question 80HardIndustrial Relations Code 2020 - Negotiating Union and Negotiating Council

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 introduced statutory provisions for the recognition of a 'negotiating union' or 'negotiating council' for purposes of collective bargaining. What is the significance of this provision?

  1. A

    The provision has no practical significance and exists purely as a symbolic, non-operative statement with no legal consequence

  2. B

    Where there is only one registered trade union in an industrial establishment, that union is to be recognised as the sole negotiating union for purposes of collective bargaining; where there are multiple registered trade unions, the union having the support of a specified minimum percentage of workers is recognised as the negotiating union, and where no single union meets this threshold, a negotiating council is constituted comprising representatives from the various unions, providing for the first time a statutory framework for trade union recognition for collective bargaining purposes at the central legislative level

  3. C

    The provision prohibits entirely the formation of more than one trade union in any single establishment

  4. D

    The negotiating union or council, once recognised, has the power to unilaterally dissolve the establishment without any reference to the employer or government

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Where there is only one registered trade union in an industrial establishment, that union is to be recognised as the sole negotiating union for purposes of collective bargaining; where there are multiple registered trade unions, the union having the support of a specified minimum percentage of workers is recognised as the negotiating union, and where no single union meets this threshold, a negotiating council is constituted comprising representatives from the various unions, providing for the first time a statutory framework for trade union recognition for collective bargaining purposes at the central legislative level

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 introduces, for the first time at the central legislative level, a statutory framework addressing the long-standing gap in Indian labour law regarding formal recognition of trade unions for collective bargaining purposes (a gap previously noted in case law such as Food Corporation of India Staff Union, which held the Trade Unions Act, 1926 itself did not mandate such recognition). The Code provides that where there is a single registered trade union, it is recognised as the sole negotiating union; where multiple unions exist, the one meeting a prescribed minimum support threshold (such as a specified percentage of workers as members) is recognised as the negotiating union; and where no single union meets this threshold, a negotiating council is constituted with proportional representation from the various unions, providing a more structured and legally defined mechanism for determining which union or combination of unions engages in collective bargaining with the employer.

Source note: Industrial Relations Code 2020

Question 81HardIndustrial Relations Code 2020 - Fixed Term Employment

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 introduced and formally recognised the concept of 'fixed term employment'. What is the significance of this category of employment within the statutory framework?

  1. A

    Fixed term employment was entirely prohibited under the Code, with the legislation banning all forms of fixed-duration employment contracts

  2. B

    Fixed term employment refers to the engagement of a worker on the basis of a written contract for a fixed period, and the Code provides that a fixed term employee shall be entitled to statutory benefits available to a permanent workman proportionately according to the period of service rendered, even though the duration of employment is fixed in advance, addressing concerns that fixed-term arrangements should not be used to systematically deny benefits otherwise available to permanent employees

  3. C

    Fixed term employees under the Code receive no statutory benefits whatsoever, distinguishing them entirely from permanent workmen

  4. D

    The concept of fixed term employment applies exclusively to government employees and has no application to private sector establishments

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Fixed term employment refers to the engagement of a worker on the basis of a written contract for a fixed period, and the Code provides that a fixed term employee shall be entitled to statutory benefits available to a permanent workman proportionately according to the period of service rendered, even though the duration of employment is fixed in advance, addressing concerns that fixed-term arrangements should not be used to systematically deny benefits otherwise available to permanent employees

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 formally recognises and defines 'fixed term employment' as engagement of a worker based on a written contract of employment for a fixed period. Importantly, the Code seeks to address concerns that such fixed-term arrangements might otherwise be used to deny workers benefits that permanent employees enjoy, by providing that fixed term employees are entitled to statutory benefits (such as those relating to hours of work, wages, and other working conditions) on a basis proportionate to their period of service, even though their employment itself is for a defined duration rather than being open-ended. This statutory recognition aims to provide a degree of flexibility for employers while still ensuring a baseline of proportionate protection for workers engaged on fixed-term arrangements.

Source note: Industrial Relations Code 2020 - Fixed Term Employment

Question 82HardCode on Wages 2019 - Section 9 - Components of Minimum Wage

Under the Code on Wages, 2019, what are the broad parameters that the appropriate government must consider while fixing the minimum rate of wages for any scheduled employment?

  1. A

    The appropriate government has complete and unrestricted discretion to fix any wage rate with no statutory guidance or parameters whatsoever

  2. B

    The appropriate government is required to take into account factors including the skill required, the arduousness of work, geographical location, and other relevant factors while fixing minimum wages, and minimum wages may be fixed on the basis of time rate, piece rate, or on a guaranteed time rate basis, subject to the overriding requirement that no minimum wage so fixed can be lower than the national floor wage

  3. C

    Minimum wages under the Code can only be fixed for agricultural employment, with no application to any industrial or service sector employment

  4. D

    The appropriate government is statutorily required to fix an identical minimum wage rate for every category of work across the entire country, with no permissible variation whatsoever

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The appropriate government is required to take into account factors including the skill required, the arduousness of work, geographical location, and other relevant factors while fixing minimum wages, and minimum wages may be fixed on the basis of time rate, piece rate, or on a guaranteed time rate basis, subject to the overriding requirement that no minimum wage so fixed can be lower than the national floor wage

The Code on Wages, 2019 requires the appropriate government, while fixing minimum wages for scheduled employments, to have regard to factors such as the skill required for the work, the arduousness of the work involved, geographical location, and other relevant considerations that may affect the appropriate wage level for a particular category of employment. The Code permits minimum wages to be fixed on the basis of a time rate, piece rate, or a guaranteed time rate, providing flexibility in wage structure design suited to different types of work, while subjecting all such fixation to the overriding constraint that the minimum wage fixed cannot fall below the national floor wage established by the Central Government.

Source note: Code on Wages 2019 - Minimum Wage Fixation Parameters

Question 83HardOccupational Safety Health and Working Conditions Code 2020 - Consolidation

The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 consolidates which group of previously separate labour legislations relating to workplace safety, health, and working conditions?

  1. A

    The Code has no relationship to any pre-existing legislation and creates entirely novel and unrelated regulatory categories

  2. B

    The Code subsumes legislations including the Factories Act, 1948; the Mines Act, 1952.

  3. C

    The Code consolidates exclusively legislation governing international trade and customs duties, with no relationship to occupational safety or working conditions

  4. D

    The Code applies only to office-based clerical employment and explicitly excludes all factory, mining, and construction sector employment

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The Code subsumes legislations including the Factories Act, 1948; the Mines Act, 1952.

The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 consolidates a substantial number of previously distinct sector-specific and general labour enactments addressing workplace safety, health standards, and working conditions, including the Factories Act, 1948; the Mines Act, 1952; the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; and other statutes covering specific categories such as plantation workers, building and construction workers, and inter-state migrant workmen. This consolidation reflects an effort to create a unified framework addressing the common underlying concerns of worker safety, health, and acceptable working conditions across the diverse range of sectors and employment categories that were previously governed by separate, sometimes inconsistent, sector-specific legislation.

Source note: Occupational Safety Health and Working Conditions Code 2020

Question 84HardInter-State Migrant Workmen Act 1979 - Purpose and Registration Requirement

The Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 was enacted to address which specific labour issue?

  1. A

    The Act addresses exclusively matters relating to foreign nationals seeking employment in India, with no application to migration of Indian workers between different states

  2. B

    The Act regulates the employment of inter-state migrant workmen, who are recruited by contractors in one state for employment in an establishment in another state, requiring registration of establishments employing such workmen and licensing of the contractors recruiting them, and providing for specific protections including journey allowance, displacement allowance, and equal wages with workmen performing similar work in the establishment where they are employed

  3. C

    The Act applies exclusively to workers employed within their home state and explicitly excludes any worker who has migrated from a different state

  4. D

    The Act was enacted to regulate exclusively the migration of agricultural workers and has no application to any industrial or construction sector employment

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The Act regulates the employment of inter-state migrant workmen, who are recruited by contractors in one state for employment in an establishment in another state, requiring registration of establishments employing such workmen and licensing of the contractors recruiting them, and providing for specific protections including journey allowance, displacement allowance, and equal wages with workmen performing similar work in the establishment where they are employed

The Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 was enacted to address the particular vulnerabilities faced by workers recruited by contractors in their home state for employment in establishments located in a different state, a category of workers who historically faced significant exploitation due to their displacement from familiar social and legal support networks. The Act requires registration of principal employers employing such inter-state migrant workmen and licensing of the contractors who recruit them, while mandating specific protective measures including payment of a displacement allowance, journey allowance for travel to and from the home state, and crucially, the right to wages at rates not less than those paid to other workmen performing the same or similar work in the establishment where the migrant workman is employed, addressing concerns about wage discrimination against migrant labour.

Source note: Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act 1979

Question 85HardSexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act 2013 - Internal Complaints Committee

Under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, every employer of a workplace having a prescribed minimum number of employees is required to constitute which body to address complaints of sexual harassment?

  1. A

    No body is required to be constituted under the Act, and all complaints must be filed directly with the local police station

  2. B

    An Internal Complaints Committee, which must be presided over by a woman employed at a senior level, and must include at least one external member from a non-governmental organisation or association committed to the cause of women, or a person familiar with issues relating to sexual harassment, with the Committee empowered to conduct an inquiry into complaints and recommend appropriate action

  3. C

    A committee composed exclusively of male senior management personnel, with no requirement for any female representation or external membership

  4. D

    A committee that has the sole power to immediately terminate the employment of any employee accused of harassment, without conducting any inquiry whatsoever

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. An Internal Complaints Committee, which must be presided over by a woman employed at a senior level, and must include at least one external member from a non-governmental organisation or association committed to the cause of women, or a person familiar with issues relating to sexual harassment, with the Committee empowered to conduct an inquiry into complaints and recommend appropriate action

The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 mandates that every employer of a workplace having ten or more employees must constitute an Internal Complaints Committee to receive and inquire into complaints of sexual harassment. The Committee must be presided over by a woman employed at a senior level, must include at least two other employees committed to the cause of women or having experience in social work or legal knowledge, and importantly must include at least one external member from a non-governmental organisation or association committed to the cause of women, or a person familiar with issues relating to sexual harassment, ensuring an element of independence and external perspective in the inquiry process. The Committee conducts inquiries following a prescribed procedure and recommends appropriate action to the employer based on its findings.

Source note: Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act 2013

Question 86HardChild Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act 1986 - Prohibition and Amendment

The Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016 significantly amended the earlier Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986. What was the principal change introduced by this amendment?

  1. A

    The amendment removed all restrictions on child labour, permitting employment of children of any age in any occupation

  2. B

    The amendment introduced a complete prohibition on the employment of children below 14 years of age in any occupation or process (subject to limited exceptions such as helping family enterprises after school hours and certain specified categories), and introduced a new category of 'adolescent' (defined as a person between 14 and 18 years), prohibiting the employment of adolescents in hazardous occupations and processes specified under the Act

  3. C

    The amendment applies only to the agricultural sector and has no application to any other sector of the economy

  4. D

    The amendment reduced the minimum age for child labour prohibition from 14 years to 5 years, thereby weakening the previous protective standard

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The amendment introduced a complete prohibition on the employment of children below 14 years of age in any occupation or process (subject to limited exceptions such as helping family enterprises after school hours and certain specified categories), and introduced a new category of 'adolescent' (defined as a person between 14 and 18 years), prohibiting the employment of adolescents in hazardous occupations and processes specified under the Act

The Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016 significantly strengthened the protective framework of the earlier 1986 Act by introducing a complete and general prohibition on the employment of children below 14 years of age in any occupation or process, moving away from the earlier Act's more limited approach of only prohibiting certain specified hazardous occupations and processes for children. The amendment carved out limited specific exceptions, such as a child helping family or family enterprises after school hours or during vacations, and participation in audio-visual entertainment subject to safeguards. The amendment also introduced the new statutory category of 'adolescent' (defined as a person between 14 and 18 years), prohibiting the employment of adolescents specifically in hazardous occupations and processes listed in the Act, reflecting an enhanced and more comprehensive child and adolescent labour protection framework.

Source note: Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act 2016

Question 87MediumApprentices Act 1961 - Purpose and Scope

The Apprentices Act, 1961 governs the engagement of apprentices in designated trades. What is the underlying objective of this legislation?

  1. A

    The Act exists purely to regulate matters unrelated to skill development or vocational training, with no connection to the training of workers

  2. B

    The Act establishes a statutory framework for the engagement, training, and regulation of apprentices in designated trades, requiring employers in establishments engaged in specified industries to engage a prescribed ratio of apprentices, providing for the execution of a contract of apprenticeship, and addressing matters such as the period of apprenticeship training, payment of stipend, and the conduct of tests and certification on satisfactory completion of training

  3. C

    The Act applies exclusively to apprentices in the legal profession and has no application to industrial or technical trades

  4. D

    The Act prohibits entirely any form of practical, on-the-job training and mandates that all vocational education must occur exclusively in classroom settings

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The Act establishes a statutory framework for the engagement, training, and regulation of apprentices in designated trades, requiring employers in establishments engaged in specified industries to engage a prescribed ratio of apprentices, providing for the execution of a contract of apprenticeship, and addressing matters such as the period of apprenticeship training, payment of stipend, and the conduct of tests and certification on satisfactory completion of training

The Apprentices Act, 1961 establishes a comprehensive statutory framework governing the engagement and training of apprentices in designated trades, reflecting the legislative objective of promoting structured skill development and vocational training within industry. The Act requires establishments engaged in specified industries to engage apprentices according to a prescribed ratio relative to their skilled workforce, mandates the execution of a formal contract of apprenticeship between the employer and the apprentice (or their guardian, if a minor), and addresses matters such as the duration of the apprenticeship training period, payment of a stipend during training, and the conduct of trade tests with certification upon satisfactory completion, providing a regulated pathway for young persons and workers to acquire recognised industrial and technical skills.

Source note: Apprentices Act 1961

Question 88HardCode on Wages 2019 - Section 26 - Bonus Eligibility Wage Ceiling

Under the Code on Wages, 2019, the eligibility for statutory bonus continues to be linked to a wage ceiling, similar to the structure under the erstwhile Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. What is the significance of this wage ceiling for bonus purposes?

  1. A

    There is no wage ceiling whatsoever under the Code on Wages for bonus eligibility, and every employee regardless of salary level is automatically entitled to the statutory bonus

  2. B

    The Code retains the concept of a prescribed wage ceiling, above which an employee, while still potentially being eligible for bonus in terms of the qualifying service period, may have the bonus calculated with reference to a notional or capped wage figure (rather than their actual higher wage) for purposes of bonus calculation, reflecting continuity with the wage-ceiling structure historically used to define and calculate statutory bonus entitlements

  3. C

    The wage ceiling under the Code applies only to determine eligibility for retirement pension and has no relationship to bonus calculation

  4. D

    The Code abolished entirely the concept of statutory bonus, replacing it with a purely discretionary payment with no legal entitlement

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The Code retains the concept of a prescribed wage ceiling, above which an employee, while still potentially being eligible for bonus in terms of the qualifying service period, may have the bonus calculated with reference to a notional or capped wage figure (rather than their actual higher wage) for purposes of bonus calculation, reflecting continuity with the wage-ceiling structure historically used to define and calculate statutory bonus entitlements

The Code on Wages, 2019 retains the historical structure of using a wage ceiling for purposes of statutory bonus calculation, building on the framework established under the erstwhile Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. Under this structure, while eligibility for bonus may extend to employees up to a certain wage level (with the ceiling subject to periodic governmental revision), the actual calculation of the bonus amount for employees whose wages exceed a specified calculation ceiling may be computed with reference to that notional ceiling figure rather than the employee's actual (higher) wage, ensuring the bonus calculation mechanism remains administratively workable and consistent with the underlying profit-sharing rationale of the statutory bonus scheme, while still extending the bonus entitlement itself to a relatively broad band of the workforce.

Source note: Code on Wages 2019 - Bonus Provisions

Question 89HardMaternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 12 - Dismissal During Pregnancy

Under Section 12 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, what protection is afforded to a woman against discharge or dismissal during her absence from work on account of pregnancy?

  1. A

    No protection whatsoever exists under the Act against discharge or dismissal during pregnancy-related absence

  2. B

    Discharge or dismissal of a woman during or on account of her absence from work in accordance with the provisions of the Act is prohibited, and it is further provided that the discharge or dismissal of a pregnant woman shall not have the effect of depriving her of the maternity benefit or medical bonus to which she would otherwise have been entitled; discharge or dismissal during this period, except on certain specified grounds such as gross misconduct, may be set aside

  3. C

    A pregnant woman can be freely discharged or dismissed by her employer for any reason whatsoever during this period without any consequence or remedy under the Act

  4. D

    The protection under Section 12 applies only to women who have been employed for more than twenty years continuously prior to becoming pregnant

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Discharge or dismissal of a woman during or on account of her absence from work in accordance with the provisions of the Act is prohibited, and it is further provided that the discharge or dismissal of a pregnant woman shall not have the effect of depriving her of the maternity benefit or medical bonus to which she would otherwise have been entitled; discharge or dismissal during this period, except on certain specified grounds such as gross misconduct, may be set aside

Section 12 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 provides important protection against discharge or dismissal of a woman during or on account of her absence from work in accordance with the provisions of the Act, recognising the vulnerability of pregnant employees to potential discriminatory termination. The provision specifically clarifies that even where discharge or dismissal occurs, it shall not have the effect of depriving the woman of the maternity benefit or medical bonus to which she would otherwise have been entitled, ensuring that an employer cannot circumvent the financial protections of the Act simply by terminating the woman's employment during the protected period, except in cases involving specified serious grounds such as gross misconduct, which are subject to a particular procedure under the Act.

Source note: Section 12, Maternity Benefit Act 1961

Question 90HardTrade Unions Act 1926 - Tamil Nadu Non-Gazetted Government Officers Union Case

In The Tamil Nadu Non-Gazetted Government Officers' Union, Madras v. The Registrar of Trade Unions (AIR 1962 Mad 234), what significant question was addressed regarding the registration of associations of government servants under the Trade Unions Act, 1926?

  1. A

    The case held that the Trade Unions Act, 1926 applies exclusively to private sector industrial workers and that no association of government employees can ever be registered under the Act regardless of any other consideration

  2. B

    The case examined whether and to what extent an association of government employees, such as non-gazetted officers, could qualify for registration under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, by satisfying the statutory definition of 'trade union' under Section 2(h), addressing the boundary question of how the Act's framework, primarily conceived in the context of industrial and trade relations, applies to associations formed by government service employees

  3. C

    The case established that all government employees in India are automatically and compulsorily members of a single nationwide registered trade union with no choice in the matter

  4. D

    The case concerned exclusively a dispute regarding the taxation of trade union membership fees, with no connection to registration questions under the Trade Unions Act

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The case examined whether and to what extent an association of government employees, such as non-gazetted officers, could qualify for registration under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, by satisfying the statutory definition of 'trade union' under Section 2(h), addressing the boundary question of how the Act's framework, primarily conceived in the context of industrial and trade relations, applies to associations formed by government service employees

In The Tamil Nadu Non-Gazetted Government Officers' Union, Madras v. The Registrar of Trade Unions (AIR 1962 Mad 234), decided alongside and closely related to Rangaswami v. Registrar of Trade Unions, the Madras High Court examined the boundary question of whether and how an association formed by government employees, specifically non-gazetted officers, could satisfy the statutory definition of 'trade union' under Section 2(h) of the Trade Unions Act, 1926, for purposes of registration. This case, together with Rangaswami, contributed to the developing jurisprudence on the scope of the Registrar's examination function and the application of the Trade Unions Act framework, which was primarily conceived in the context of industrial and commercial trade relations, to associations formed within the structure of government service.

Source note: The Tamil Nadu Non-Gazetted Government Officers' Union, Madras v. The Registrar of Trade Unions AIR 1962 Mad 234

Question 91HardFactories Act 1948 - Section 87 - Prohibition of Employment in Dangerous Operations

Under Section 87 of the Factories Act, 1948, the State Government is empowered to make rules to:

  1. A

    Permit children below the age of fourteen years to be employed in any factory process whatsoever without restriction

  2. B

    Prohibit or restrict the employment of women, adolescents, or children in any manufacturing process or operation which is found to be of a dangerous nature, exposing them to serious risk of bodily injury, poisoning, or disease

  3. C

    Mandate that all factory operations must be carried out exclusively by adult male workers with no exception of any kind

  4. D

    Eliminate entirely any safety regulation pertaining to dangerous manufacturing processes

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Prohibit or restrict the employment of women, adolescents, or children in any manufacturing process or operation which is found to be of a dangerous nature, exposing them to serious risk of bodily injury, poisoning, or disease

Section 87 of the Factories Act, 1948 empowers the State Government to make rules prohibiting or restricting, in any specified factory or class of factories, the employment of women, adolescents, or children in any manufacturing process or operation that is found to expose them to serious risk of bodily injury, poisoning, or disease. This provision reflects the Act's protective orientation towards categories of workers considered more vulnerable to occupational hazards, allowing for targeted regulatory restrictions on particularly dangerous operations rather than a uniform standard applicable to all workers regardless of the specific risks involved.

Source note: Section 87, Factories Act 1948

Question 92MediumFactories Act 1948 - Section 67 - Prohibition of Employment of Young Children

Under Section 67 of the Factories Act, 1948, no child who has not completed his fourteenth year shall be:

  1. A

    Permitted to enter the factory premises under any circumstances, including for purely social or non-work-related visits

  2. B

    Required or allowed to work in any factory; this absolute prohibition reflects the Act's alignment with broader child labour protection policy, ensuring that factories, recognised as inherently more hazardous work environments, are completely closed to children below the minimum age threshold

  3. C

    Permitted to work only during night shift hours, while daytime work remains permissible

  4. D

    Required to undergo a medical examination before being permitted to commence factory work

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Required or allowed to work in any factory; this absolute prohibition reflects the Act's alignment with broader child labour protection policy, ensuring that factories, recognised as inherently more hazardous work environments, are completely closed to children below the minimum age threshold

Section 67 of the Factories Act, 1948 establishes an absolute prohibition: no child who has not completed his fourteenth year shall be required or allowed to work in any factory. This complete prohibition, rather than a mere restriction, reflects the heightened concern for child safety in the factory environment, which the legislature considered inherently more hazardous than many other work settings, warranting a categorical bar rather than a regulated permission scheme, consistent with subsequent strengthening of child labour protections under the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016.

Source note: Section 67, Factories Act 1948

Question 93MediumMaternity Benefit Act 1961 - Section 4 - Employment of Women During Certain Periods Prohibited

Under Section 4 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, an employer is prohibited from knowingly employing a woman in any establishment during which period in connection with childbirth?

  1. A

    There is no period of prohibited employment under the Act, and a woman may be employed at any time regardless of her pregnancy or childbirth status

  2. B

    The six weeks immediately following the day of her delivery, miscarriage, or medical termination of pregnancy; the Act also restricts the nature of work a pregnant woman may be required to perform during certain periods preceding the expected delivery date

  3. C

    The entire duration of the pregnancy from conception to delivery, with no employment permitted at any point during this period

  4. D

    Only the single day of delivery itself, with no restriction on employment either before or after that specific day

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The six weeks immediately following the day of her delivery, miscarriage, or medical termination of pregnancy; the Act also restricts the nature of work a pregnant woman may be required to perform during certain periods preceding the expected delivery date

Section 4 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 prohibits an employer from knowingly employing a woman in any establishment during the six weeks immediately following the day of her delivery, miscarriage, or medical termination of pregnancy, providing a mandatory recovery period during which the woman cannot be required to work regardless of her own willingness. The Act further restricts, under related provisions, the nature of arduous work, work involving long hours of standing, or work likely to interfere with pregnancy or the normal development of the foetus, that a woman may be required to perform during specified periods preceding her expected delivery date, providing additional protective regulation of working conditions during pregnancy beyond the core leave entitlement.

Source note: Section 4, Maternity Benefit Act 1961

Question 94HardPayment of Bonus Act 1965 - Section 32 - Establishments Excluded from the Act

Under Section 32 of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, certain categories of employees and establishments are excluded from the scope of the Act. Which of the following is an example of such an exclusion?

  1. A

    The Act applies to absolutely every category of employee and establishment in India without any exception whatsoever

  2. B

    Employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, employees of any establishment engaged in any industry carried on by or under the authority of any department of the Central Government or a State Government dealing with sovereign functions, and employees of certain other specifically listed categories such as seamen and dock workers (governed by their own separate schemes) are excluded from the operation of the Act

  3. C

    Only employees who have completed more than thirty years of continuous service are excluded from the Act

  4. D

    Only female employees are excluded from the scope of the Payment of Bonus Act, with the Act applying exclusively to male employees

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, employees of any establishment engaged in any industry carried on by or under the authority of any department of the Central Government or a State Government dealing with sovereign functions, and employees of certain other specifically listed categories such as seamen and dock workers (governed by their own separate schemes) are excluded from the operation of the Act

Section 32 of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 lists specific categories of establishments and employees excluded from the Act's application, recognising that certain sectors are governed by alternative arrangements or considered inappropriate for the Act's general profit-sharing bonus framework. These exclusions include employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, employees of departments carrying on sovereign functions of government, and various other specifically enumerated categories such as seamen and certain dock workers, who may be governed by sector-specific arrangements or considered to fall outside the general scheme contemplated by the Act, reflecting a deliberate legislative carve-out rather than a universal application of the bonus scheme to every employment category in the country.

Source note: Section 32, Payment of Bonus Act 1965

Question 95HardEmployees Compensation Act 1923 - Section 4 - Calculation of Compensation Amount

Under Section 4 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, the amount of compensation payable in case of death of an employee resulting from an employment injury is calculated, broadly, with reference to which factors?

  1. A

    The amount of compensation is a fixed flat sum identical for every case regardless of the deceased employee's wages, age, or any other circumstance

  2. B

    The amount of compensation for death is calculated as a percentage of the deceased employee's monthly wages multiplied by a relevant factor based on the employee's age, subject to a prescribed minimum amount, reflecting an attempt to provide compensation broadly proportionate to the deceased employee's earning capacity and the corresponding economic loss suffered by dependants, while ensuring a statutory minimum floor

  3. C

    The compensation amount is determined exclusively based on the employer's annual profit for the relevant financial year, with no reference to the employee's wages or circumstances at all

  4. D

    No compensation whatsoever is payable in the case of death resulting from an employment injury under the Employees Compensation Act

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The amount of compensation for death is calculated as a percentage of the deceased employee's monthly wages multiplied by a relevant factor based on the employee's age, subject to a prescribed minimum amount, reflecting an attempt to provide compensation broadly proportionate to the deceased employee's earning capacity and the corresponding economic loss suffered by dependants, while ensuring a statutory minimum floor

Section 4 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 establishes a formula-based approach for calculating compensation in cases of death resulting from employment injury, generally computed as a percentage of the deceased employee's monthly wages multiplied by a relevant age-based factor (reflecting the principle that compensation should account for the remaining expected working life and earning capacity that has been lost), subject to a prescribed statutory minimum amount that ensures dependants receive at least a baseline level of compensation even in cases involving relatively low-wage employees. This formula-driven approach aims to provide a degree of proportionality between the compensation awarded and the actual economic loss suffered by the deceased employee's dependants, while maintaining administrative predictability and a guaranteed minimum protection.

Source note: Section 4, Employees Compensation Act 1923

Question 96MediumIndustrial Employment Standing Orders Act 1946 - Section 10A - Temporary Application Pending Certification

Under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, pending the certification of standing orders submitted by an employer, what is the legal position regarding the conditions of employment in the establishment?

  1. A

    There are no conditions of employment whatsoever applicable to the establishment during the pendency of certification, leaving a complete regulatory vacuum

  2. B

    The model standing orders, prescribed by the appropriate government, apply to the establishment as if they had been certified, until such time as the certifying officer certifies the employer's own draft standing orders submitted for that establishment, ensuring continuity of a defined regulatory framework governing conditions of employment throughout the certification process

  3. C

    The employer has complete and unrestricted discretion to apply any conditions of employment of their choosing, with no statutory default framework applicable during the pendency of certification

  4. D

    All workers are automatically and immediately dismissed from employment pending the completion of the certification process

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The model standing orders, prescribed by the appropriate government, apply to the establishment as if they had been certified, until such time as the certifying officer certifies the employer's own draft standing orders submitted for that establishment, ensuring continuity of a defined regulatory framework governing conditions of employment throughout the certification process

The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, through its provisions addressing model standing orders, ensures that there is no regulatory vacuum during the period when an employer's submitted draft standing orders are pending certification by the appropriate certifying officer. During this interim period, the model standing orders prescribed by the appropriate government apply to the establishment as the operative framework governing conditions of employment, providing continuity and certainty for both the employer and workmen until the employer's own specific, establishment-tailored standing orders are formally certified and take effect, replacing the model standing orders for that particular establishment.

Source note: Section 12A, Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946

Question 97HardCode on Wages 2019 - Gender Neutrality in Wage Provisions

The Code on Wages, 2019, by consolidating the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 into its provisions, addresses the principle of equal remuneration. What is the significance of this consolidation for the gender-equality dimension of wage law?

  1. A

    The consolidation entirely eliminated any reference to gender equality, removing all protection against gender-based wage discrimination from Indian law

  2. B

    The Code retains and integrates the principle that there shall be no discrimination in the matter of wages between employees on the ground of gender, in respect of the same work or work of a similar nature done by any employee, bringing this anti-discrimination principle within the unified wage code rather than leaving it as a standalone separate statute

  3. C

    The consolidation applies the equal remuneration principle exclusively to government employees, excluding the entire private sector from this protection

  4. D

    The Code applies the equal remuneration principle only to employees earning above a specified high-income threshold, excluding lower-wage workers from this protection

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. The Code retains and integrates the principle that there shall be no discrimination in the matter of wages between employees on the ground of gender, in respect of the same work or work of a similar nature done by any employee, bringing this anti-discrimination principle within the unified wage code rather than leaving it as a standalone separate statute

The Code on Wages, 2019, by absorbing the substantive principles of the erstwhile Equal Remuneration Act, 1976, retains and integrates the prohibition against gender-based wage discrimination for the same work or work of a similar nature, bringing this important anti-discrimination principle within the unified statutory wage framework. This consolidation reflects a structural and organisational change (placing the equal remuneration principle alongside other wage-related matters such as minimum wages, timely payment, and bonus within a single code) rather than a substantive weakening of the underlying gender-equality protection, which continues to operate as a core principle within the consolidated framework governing wage-related employment matters.

Source note: Code on Wages 2019 - Equal Remuneration Provisions

Question 98HardIndustrial Disputes Act 1947 - Section 36 - Representation of Parties

Under Section 36 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a workman who is a party to a dispute is entitled to be represented in proceedings under the Act by:

  1. A

    Only by a practicing advocate enrolled with the Bar Council, with no other category of representative permitted under any circumstances

  2. B

    An officer of a registered trade union of which he is a member, or an officer of a federation of trade unions to which the union is affiliated, or where the workman is not a member of any trade union, by an officer of a trade union connected with the industry concerned or by any other workman employed in that industry and authorised, in the prescribed manner, with restrictions placed on the appearance of legal practitioners in certain proceedings, particularly before Conciliation Officers and Boards, without the consent of the other parties and the relevant authority

  3. C

    Section 36 prohibits entirely any form of representation, requiring every workman to personally appear and argue their own case without any assistance whatsoever

  4. D

    Only by a government-appointed legal aid lawyer, with no choice or discretion left to the workman regarding who represents them

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. An officer of a registered trade union of which he is a member, or an officer of a federation of trade unions to which the union is affiliated, or where the workman is not a member of any trade union, by an officer of a trade union connected with the industry concerned or by any other workman employed in that industry and authorised, in the prescribed manner, with restrictions placed on the appearance of legal practitioners in certain proceedings, particularly before Conciliation Officers and Boards, without the consent of the other parties and the relevant authority

Section 36 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 provides a specific framework for representation of parties in proceedings under the Act, allowing a workman to be represented by an officer of a registered trade union of which he is a member, an officer of a federation of trade unions to which that union is affiliated, or, where the workman is not a union member, by an officer of a trade union connected with the relevant industry or another authorised workman from that industry. Notably, the provision places restrictions on the appearance of legal practitioners (advocates) in certain proceedings, particularly before Conciliation Officers and Boards, generally requiring the consent of the opposing parties and the relevant authority, reflecting a policy preference in the original Act for a more informal, trade-union-mediated representation structure rather than formal legal representation at every stage of the dispute resolution process.

Source note: Section 36, Industrial Disputes Act 1947

Question 99HardTrade Unions Act 1926 - Section 21A - Disqualifications of Office-Bearers

Under Section 21A of the Trade Unions Act, 1926, a person is disqualified from being chosen as, or from continuing as, an office-bearer of a registered trade union if such person:

  1. A

    Has never previously held any position of employment in any industry whatsoever

  2. B

    Has not attained the age of eighteen years, or has been convicted by a court in India of any offence involving moral turpitude and sentenced to imprisonment, unless a period of five years has elapsed since his release

  3. C

    Is a citizen of a foreign country, regardless of any other circumstance or qualification

  4. D

    Has completed more than twenty-five years of continuous trade union membership, which the section treats as an automatic disqualification due to excessive tenure

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Has not attained the age of eighteen years, or has been convicted by a court in India of any offence involving moral turpitude and sentenced to imprisonment, unless a period of five years has elapsed since his release

Section 21A of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 establishes specific disqualifications for office-bearers of registered trade unions, providing that a person is disqualified from being chosen as, or continuing as, an office-bearer if he has not attained the age of eighteen years, or if he has been convicted by a court in India of an offence involving moral turpitude and sentenced to imprisonment, unless a period of five years has elapsed since his release. These disqualification criteria aim to ensure a baseline standard of maturity and personal integrity among those holding leadership positions within registered trade unions, balancing the freedom of association with reasonable safeguards regarding the character and suitability of union leadership.

Source note: Section 21A, Trade Unions Act 1926

Question 100HardTrade Unions Act 1926 - Section 22 - Proportion of Office-Bearers to be Connected with the Industry

Under Section 22 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926, what proportion of the total number of office-bearers of a registered trade union of workmen must, ordinarily, be persons actually engaged or employed in the industry with which the trade union is connected?

  1. A

    There is no requirement whatsoever regarding the connection of office-bearers to the relevant industry, and any person regardless of their occupation may serve as an office-bearer without restriction

  2. B

    Not less than one-half (or such other proportion as may be specified by the appropriate government) of the total number of office-bearers of a registered trade union of workmen shall be persons actually engaged or employed in an industry with which the trade union is connected, subject to specified exceptions, reflecting the legislative intent to ensure that trade union leadership maintains a meaningful and substantial connection to the workforce and industry the union represents

  3. C

    All office-bearers, without any exception whatsoever, must be persons who have never been employed in any capacity in the relevant industry

  4. D

    The proportion requirement applies only to trade unions registered after the year 2000 and has no application to trade unions registered before that date

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Not less than one-half (or such other proportion as may be specified by the appropriate government) of the total number of office-bearers of a registered trade union of workmen shall be persons actually engaged or employed in an industry with which the trade union is connected, subject to specified exceptions, reflecting the legislative intent to ensure that trade union leadership maintains a meaningful and substantial connection to the workforce and industry the union represents

Section 22 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 requires that not less than one-half (or such other proportion as the appropriate government may specify by notification) of the total number of office-bearers of a registered trade union of workmen must be persons actually engaged or employed in an industry connected with the union, subject to certain exceptions permitting a limited number of 'outside' office-bearers (often experienced trade union organisers, advocates, or other professionals not directly employed in the relevant industry) to also hold office. This requirement reflects the legislative intent to ensure that trade union leadership retains a meaningful connection to and representation from the actual workforce of the industry concerned, while still permitting some external expertise and leadership support within defined limits.

Source note: Section 22, Trade Unions Act 1926