CLAT UG question bank

Logical Reasoning MCQs for CLAT UG, Page 2

CLAT UG Logical Reasoning questions 24-47 of 310, with answer keys and explanations covering conclusions, assumptions, inferences, flaws, analogies, and arguments strengthened or weakened by evidence.

310 questions62 topics24-47 on this page
Start adaptive practiceBrowse CLAT UG

Coverage

Topics in this subject

Practice passage-based CLAT UG questions with answers for English, current affairs, legal reasoning, logical reasoning, and quantitative techniques.

  • AI Summaries and Source Reading5
  • AI Translation and Error Rates5
  • Air Quality Alerts and Public Behaviour5
  • Algorithmic Hiring and Past Data5
  • Carbon Labels and Consumer Decisions5
  • Carbon Offsets and Additionality5
  • Cashless Buses and Boarding Time5
  • Citizen Science and Data Quality5
  • Classroom Cameras and Evidence5
  • Congestion Pricing and Urban Mobility5
  • Court Disposal Statistics5
  • Extended Library Hours5
  • Extended Library Hours and Borrowing5
  • Facial Recognition and Base Rates5
  • Facial Recognition and Public Evidence5
  • Fare-Free Public Transport5
  • Flood Maps and Property Risk5
  • Flood Sirens and False Alarms5
  • Food Labels and Consumer Choice5
  • Food Labels and Consumer Understanding5
  • Four-Day School Week Evidence5
  • Four-Day Workweek Evidence5
  • Free Bus Fares and Ridership Evidence5
  • Heat Action Plans and Evidence5
  • Heatwave Cooling Centres5
  • Hospital Wait-Time Targets5
  • Hospital Waiting-Time Targets5
  • Local Food Procurement in Schools5
  • Museum Repatriation and Digital Copies5
  • Noise Sensors and Complaint Data5
  • Open-Book Examinations and Learning5
  • Plagiarism Detectors and False Positives5
  • Police Body Cameras and Complaint Rates5
  • Predictive Maintenance for Water Pipes5
  • Predictive Policing and Feedback Loops5
  • Predictive Policing and Historical Data5
  • Public Art Surveys and Selection Bias5
  • Public Defender Caseload Statistics5
  • Public Libraries and Digital Access5
  • Public Wi-Fi and Digital Access5
  • Rainfall Forecasts and Probability5
  • Recorded Lectures and Learning Outcomes5
  • Recycling Bins and Waste Reduction5
  • Remote Work and Office Productivity5
  • Repairability and Consumer Choice5
  • Reusable Packaging Deposits5
  • River Cleanup and Downstream Waste5
  • Road Repair Complaints and Access5
  • School Breakfast and Attendance Evidence5
  • School Devices and Learning Evidence5
  • School Rankings and Attendance5
  • School Start Times and Evidence5
  • Street Lighting and Night Accidents5
  • Textbook Downloads and Learning5
  • Tree Planting and Urban Temperature Claims5
  • University Rankings and Measurement5
  • Urban Tree Planting and Survival5
  • Video Hearings and Case Disposal5
  • Water Meters and Household Consumption5
  • Water Pricing and Essential Access5
  • Wellness Apps and Sick Leave5
  • Wetland Tourism and Visitor Counts5
Passage or principleOriginal argumentative passage

A proposal would place simple nutrition warnings on the front of packaged foods. Critics argue that the detailed information already printed on the back is sufficient and that another label would restrict consumer choice. Providing information does not restrict choice merely because it makes a risk easier to notice. The real question is whether the warning improves understanding without misleading buyers. A symbol based on one nutrient could oversimplify a product, while a dense table may be accurate but practically invisible during a quick purchase. A trial should compare several designs using tasks that resemble real shopping. Researchers should test whether buyers identify relevant differences, not merely whether they remember a symbol minutes later. They should also examine whether manufacturers reformulate products or replace one undesirable ingredient with another. Labels cannot by themselves overcome price, availability, or advertising. Yet an incomplete tool can still be useful. The proposal should be judged by measurable improvement in informed choice, not by the impossible standard of solving diet-related disease alone.

Question 24HardFood Labels and Consumer Understanding

Which finding would most weaken the case for the tested label?

  1. A

    The label uses less ink than expected.

  2. B

    Some shoppers also read advertisements.

  3. C

    Buyers systematically misread the symbol and choose less suitable products.

  4. D

    The back label remains available.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Buyers systematically misread the symbol and choose less suitable products.

C shows that the warning harms rather than improves informed choice. A, B, and D do not undermine its effectiveness.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 3, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 25MediumFood Labels and Consumer Understanding

What error does the author identify in demanding that labels solve diet-related disease by themselves?

  1. A

    It evaluates a limited tool against an unrealistically complete solution.

  2. B

    It relies too heavily on realistic shopping tasks.

  3. C

    It considers price and availability.

  4. D

    It measures informed choice.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. It evaluates a limited tool against an unrealistically complete solution.

A correctly identifies the perfection standard rejected in the final paragraph.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 3, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Passage or principleOriginal argumentative passage

A company claims that office attendance increases productivity because teams present in the office completed more projects last year than remote teams. The comparison is weak. Office teams handled shorter projects, while remote teams were assigned complex work lasting several months. Counting completed projects also ignores quality, value, and work in progress. Yet it would be equally careless to conclude that remote work is superior. Employees may differ in experience, home conditions, and job type. The company should compare similar tasks and track output quality, deadlines, collaboration, retention, and costs. A phased policy could vary attendance by role and measure results before imposing one rule on everyone. Work location may affect performance, but it is rarely the only cause. A useful policy must separate the effect of location from the effect of who performs which work under what conditions.

Question 26MediumRemote Work and Office Productivity

What is the main flaw in the company's comparison?

  1. A

    The teams performed projects of different complexity and duration.

  2. B

    The company counted no projects.

  3. C

    Remote teams worked in the same office.

  4. D

    All projects had identical value.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. The teams performed projects of different complexity and duration.

A identifies the confounding difference between team assignments. The other options contradict the passage.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 3, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 27HardRemote Work and Office Productivity

Which fact would most weaken the company's claim?

  1. A

    Office rent remained constant.

  2. B

    Some workers prefer tea.

  3. C

    The company changed its logo.

  4. D

    When matched on task and experience, remote teams meet deadlines with equal quality and lower cost.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. When matched on task and experience, remote teams meet deadlines with equal quality and lower cost.

D removes task differences and shows no productivity advantage for office attendance.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 3, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 28MediumRemote Work and Office Productivity

Why does the author recommend tracking work in progress?

  1. A

    To prevent any project from being completed

  2. B

    Because completion counts may undervalue long, complex projects already advancing

  3. C

    To prove that quality never matters

  4. D

    Because deadlines cannot be measured

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Because completion counts may undervalue long, complex projects already advancing

B follows from the difference between short completed work and longer ongoing projects.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 3, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 29HardRemote Work and Office Productivity

Which conclusion is best supported?

  1. A

    One location policy will suit every role.

  2. B

    Remote work is always superior.

  3. C

    Productivity effects should be assessed while controlling for task, worker, and working conditions.

  4. D

    Project counts provide complete evidence.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Productivity effects should be assessed while controlling for task, worker, and working conditions.

C restates the final paragraph. A, B, and D make claims the author rejects.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 3, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 30MediumRemote Work and Office Productivity

Which evidence would most strengthen the recommendation for a phased policy?

  1. A

    Different roles show substantially different performance responses to attendance requirements.

  2. B

    Every employee has the same job.

  3. C

    No performance measure can be collected.

  4. D

    Location never affects collaboration.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Different roles show substantially different performance responses to attendance requirements.

A supports varying attendance by role and testing results. B, C, and D undermine or make the proposal unnecessary.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 3, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Passage or principleOriginal argumentative passage

A district plans to give every secondary student a tablet because one high-performing school uses tablets in all classes. The example does not show that devices caused the school's results. Its teachers received extensive training, class sizes were smaller, and students already had reliable internet at home. This does not mean tablets lack value. They may improve access to texts, assist students with disabilities, and support feedback. But purchasing hardware without training, repair, connectivity, and suitable material may produce expensive storage rather than learning. The district should pilot the programme across varied schools and compare attendance, engagement, learning, repair costs, and unequal access. The comparison should examine what the devices enable, not treat screen time as an achievement by itself. Technology policy fails when procurement is mistaken for implementation. The relevant question is not whether tablets are modern, but whether a complete system helps students learn better than realistic alternatives.

Question 31MediumSchool Devices and Learning Evidence

Which statement best expresses the author's conclusion?

  1. A

    Tablets should be banned from every school.

  2. B

    Modern hardware automatically improves grades.

  3. C

    Devices should be tested as part of a complete learning system against realistic alternatives.

  4. D

    The highest-performing school should design all national policy.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Devices should be tested as part of a complete learning system against realistic alternatives.

C captures the qualified recommendation. A, B, and D make unsupported absolute claims.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 4, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 32HardSchool Devices and Learning Evidence

Why does the high-performing school fail to prove that tablets caused its results?

  1. A

    Other differences such as training, class size, and connectivity may explain performance.

  2. B

    The school did not use any tablets.

  3. C

    High performance cannot be measured.

  4. D

    Technology never affects learning.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Other differences such as training, class size, and connectivity may explain performance.

A identifies confounding factors. The other options contradict the passage.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 4, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 33MediumSchool Devices and Learning Evidence

Which finding would most strengthen the proposed pilot?

  1. A

    Tablet boxes are visually attractive.

  2. B

    Matched schools using the full support system show sustained learning gains.

  3. C

    Students can name the tablet brand.

  4. D

    The devices increase screen time without improving outcomes.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Matched schools using the full support system show sustained learning gains.

B supplies controlled evidence of learning benefit.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 4, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 34HardSchool Devices and Learning Evidence

Which fact would most weaken a hardware-only rollout?

  1. A

    Tablets can display books.

  2. B

    Some teachers use digital feedback.

  3. C

    Students enjoy new devices for one week.

  4. D

    Frequent breakdowns and weak connectivity leave many students unable to access lessons.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Frequent breakdowns and weak connectivity leave many students unable to access lessons.

D shows that missing support prevents educational use.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 4, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 35MediumSchool Devices and Learning Evidence

What mistake is captured by the phrase "procurement is mistaken for implementation"?

  1. A

    Assuming that buying equipment is equivalent to creating an effective programme

  2. B

    Comparing learning outcomes across schools

  3. C

    Training teachers before rollout

  4. D

    Measuring repair costs

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Assuming that buying equipment is equivalent to creating an effective programme

A correctly explains the distinction between purchase and effective use.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 4, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Passage or principleOriginal argumentative passage

A city proposes charging households more per unit of water after basic consumption exceeds a threshold. Supporters argue that a flat price gives little reason to reduce luxury use during scarcity. Critics reply that water is essential and should never be priced progressively. The criticism confuses essential access with unlimited use at one rate. A policy can protect a low-cost basic allowance while charging more for unusually high consumption. Yet household size, leaks, disability, and shared connections can make high use unavoidable. Without adjustment, the tariff may punish need rather than waste. Price also cannot repair broken pipes or create supply. Revenue should support leak reduction and reliable service, especially in poorly served areas. Results should be measured through conservation, affordability, and service quality. A progressive tariff is therefore a design problem, not a complete solution. Its fairness depends on protecting basic needs, recognising legitimate variation, and using revenue to improve the system.

Question 36MediumWater Pricing and Essential Access

Which statement best expresses the author's conclusion?

  1. A

    A progressive tariff may help if it protects need, adjusts for circumstances, and improves service.

  2. B

    All water should be free in unlimited quantities.

  3. C

    Price alone can create new water supplies.

  4. D

    Every high-use household wastes water.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. A progressive tariff may help if it protects need, adjusts for circumstances, and improves service.

A captures the qualified conclusion. B, C, and D are rejected.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 4, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 37HardWater Pricing and Essential Access

Which finding would most weaken the fairness of an unadjusted high-use charge?

  1. A

    Luxury gardens consume significant water.

  2. B

    Some households voluntarily conserve.

  3. C

    The city publishes monthly bills.

  4. D

    Large low-income families pay penalties mainly because essential use exceeds the threshold.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Large low-income families pay penalties mainly because essential use exceeds the threshold.

D shows that the tariff punishes need rather than waste.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 4, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 38MediumWater Pricing and Essential Access

The conservation argument most directly assumes that:

  1. A

    Water demand never responds to price.

  2. B

    At least some use above the threshold can be reduced when its price rises.

  3. C

    Every pipe is leak-free.

  4. D

    Household size is identical.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. At least some use above the threshold can be reduced when its price rises.

B is necessary for price to influence consumption.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 4, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 39HardWater Pricing and Essential Access

Why should revenue support leak reduction?

  1. A

    To increase unavoidable household loss

  2. B

    To eliminate all billing records

  3. C

    Because conservation by users cannot substitute for repairing supply-system waste

  4. D

    Because tariffs automatically repair pipes.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Because conservation by users cannot substitute for repairing supply-system waste

C follows from the statement that price cannot repair infrastructure.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 4, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 40MediumWater Pricing and Essential Access

What false choice does the author reject?

  1. A

    Protecting essential access or using any progressive price at all

  2. B

    Measuring affordability or service quality

  3. C

    Reducing leaks or publishing bills

  4. D

    Recognising disability or household size

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Protecting essential access or using any progressive price at all

A is correct because basic access and higher charges for luxury use can coexist.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 4, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Passage or principleOriginal argumentative passage

After a severe summer, a city proposes sending heat alerts whenever the forecast crosses a fixed temperature. Alerts are useful, but issuing them is not the same as protecting people. A warning helps only if residents receive it, understand it, and can act on it. Advice to remain indoors may be unrealistic for street vendors, construction workers, and households in poorly ventilated homes. The city should pair alerts with shaded rest areas, drinking water, adjusted work hours, medical preparedness, and outreach in locally understood languages. The threshold also deserves review. Humidity, night-time temperature, age, illness, and housing conditions affect risk. A single daytime temperature may miss dangerous conditions or produce warnings too broad to guide action. Success should be measured through reduced illness and unequal exposure, not the number of messages sent. Alerts are one part of a heat action plan, and their value depends on the practical support surrounding them.

Question 41MediumHeat Action Plans and Evidence

Which statement best expresses the author's conclusion?

  1. A

    Heat alerts should be abandoned completely.

  2. B

    The number of alerts is the only relevant measure.

  3. C

    Alerts need practical support and risk-sensitive design to protect people.

  4. D

    Temperature has no connection with health.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: C. Alerts need practical support and risk-sensitive design to protect people.

C captures the passage's qualified support for alerts within a broader plan.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 5, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 42HardHeat Action Plans and Evidence

Advice to remain indoors assumes that:

  1. A

    Residents have access to indoor conditions safer than outdoor exposure.

  2. B

    Every resident works at night.

  3. C

    Humidity never changes risk.

  4. D

    Warnings automatically reduce temperature.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Residents have access to indoor conditions safer than outdoor exposure.

A identifies the practical condition required for the advice to protect residents.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 5, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 43MediumHeat Action Plans and Evidence

Which finding would most strengthen the author's proposed approach?

  1. A

    The city sends more messages but illness remains unchanged.

  2. B

    Neighbourhoods receiving alerts, water, rest areas, and outreach show a marked fall in heat illness.

  3. C

    Residents prefer shorter weather reports.

  4. D

    A fixed threshold is easy to print.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: B. Neighbourhoods receiving alerts, water, rest areas, and outreach show a marked fall in heat illness.

B directly links the combined intervention to the intended health outcome.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 5, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 44HardHeat Action Plans and Evidence

Which finding would most weaken reliance on a single daytime temperature threshold?

  1. A

    Forecasts are displayed on phones.

  2. B

    Summer occurs every year.

  3. C

    Some residents read weather reports.

  4. D

    High humidity and hot nights cause illness even when daytime temperature remains below the threshold.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. High humidity and hot nights cause illness even when daytime temperature remains below the threshold.

D shows that the single measure misses dangerous conditions.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 5, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 45MediumHeat Action Plans and Evidence

Why is counting messages an inadequate measure of success?

  1. A

    It measures an activity rather than whether exposure and illness declined.

  2. B

    Messages cannot contain words.

  3. C

    Every message reaches every resident.

  4. D

    Health outcomes are unrelated to public policy.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. It measures an activity rather than whether exposure and illness declined.

A correctly distinguishes programme output from protective outcome.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 5, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Passage or principleOriginal argumentative passage

A university announces that raising its rank should be its chief objective because students use rankings when choosing institutions. Rankings can provide useful comparisons, but a rank is produced by selected indicators and assigned weights. It is not the institution itself. If research citations receive heavy weight, a university may divert resources from teaching or local-language scholarship even when these serve its mission. If student satisfaction is measured through voluntary surveys, the results may overrepresent those most eager to respond. The problem is not that indicators are worthless, but that each captures only part of performance. Rankings may still reveal weaknesses and encourage transparency. They should be read alongside evidence about teaching, access, research quality, financial stability, and public purpose. A university that improves a metric without improving the underlying activity has learned to manage the score rather than the institution. The sensible objective is therefore better performance according to a clearly stated mission. A higher rank may follow, but it should remain evidence to interpret rather than a target that replaces judgement.

Question 46MediumUniversity Rankings and Measurement

Which statement best expresses the author's conclusion?

  1. A

    Universities should pursue their mission and treat rankings as limited evidence.

  2. B

    All rankings must be prohibited.

  3. C

    Research quality can never be compared.

  4. D

    Student choice is entirely irrational.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: A. Universities should pursue their mission and treat rankings as limited evidence.

A captures the author's distinction between institutional purpose and rank as a metric.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 5, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Question 47HardUniversity Rankings and Measurement

Which fact would most weaken the use of a voluntary satisfaction survey as representative evidence?

  1. A

    The survey uses complete sentences.

  2. B

    The university publishes the result.

  3. C

    Several courses include assessments.

  4. D

    Respondents differ systematically from the many students who do not reply.

View answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. Respondents differ systematically from the many students who do not reply.

D shows selection bias and weakens the survey's representativeness.

Source note: Original LexMentor CLAT UG Batch 5, prepared in the official passage-based format.

Continue revision

English Language310 questions with explanationsCurrent Affairs including General Knowledge310 questions with explanationsLegal Reasoning310 questions with explanationsQuantitative Techniques310 questions with explanations